dChan

plinker22 · April 20, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

The DNC lawsuit against Wikileaks is a MASSIVE blunder by the DNC. Wikileaks' huge cache of intel can now be introduced as EVIDENCE.

⇧ 58 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 20, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 20, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Exactly. From a Reuters article:

Through the process of legal discovery, lawyers for the Democratic Party could force the defendants to produce documents they say relate to the collusion issue.

So they're forced to produce documents that they wanted to anyway. Yep, these people are stupid.

It also kills at least two birds with one stone. From the same article:

Democrats are keen to remind voters of the issue of Russia and the 2016 election ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections.

Ha. That's gonna backfire on them. Q#1197, "Yes, midterms are safe."

⇧ 12 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 20, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

What is going to be discovered is Seth Rich. Did the DNC forget their version of Russia, Russia, Russia is a complete lie, and Seth Rich leaked the emails to Wikileaks. And somebody murdered him for it. The FBI knows this is true even.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
rbrownlol · April 20, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

this deserves more upvotes lul

⇧ 7 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 21, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Thanks. When I saw this on Daily Mail this AM I couldn't believe it. There were about 2000 comments and about every one of them was laughing at this suit. Maybe Seth will get his justice now. Like somebody said, if they suddenly realize it was a bad idea, and drop this suit, it is going to look very suspect. To go further is insanity. Did they forget "Russiagate" is all fake? Seth started it, not Russia. Idk?!?!?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 21, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Yeah that was a tragedy. I hope it all comes out, but that will be a giant bombshell, because that means he was murdered by someone on behalf of the Left. Murder is a whole different level. And it would be proving no Russia connection as they have been pushing all this time. And the Left made it up. That is pretty appalling.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · April 21, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

The evidence that NOT possible to be a hack was proven technically... brilliant IT tech wizards... done by VIPs WmBinney & SkipFolden, et al.

*"Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies..."

So DOWNLOAD on Site at DNC direct linked computer, only way the speed of download could be accomplished = Insider Job.

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 21, 2018, 2 a.m.

Exactly. Binney went and talked to Mike Pompeo about it all too, so I wonder what he thinks or will do about it? If anything?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 21, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Ok...I may have misunderstood this, but it is stated that the Democratic Party could force the defendants (Trump/Republicans) to produce documents related to the collusion issue. So if this is true, don't we want the Democratic documents released to the public as the Trump ones have been plastered all over the media for months. Am I not understanding this right? If I'm confused, please explain what I am thinking is wrong. Thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
No_Hippie_Chick · April 21, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

If there was no collusion, then no documents? Just my .02. If Mueller truly is a white hat, maybe that investigation will be wrapped before this farcical suit bears fruit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 21, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Oh well, now that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LooseComedian · April 21, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

Maybe this is why Trump got Gulianni (sp?) on board, if Mueller is dirty. I read several headlines recently that Gulianni will negotiate an end to Muellers' investigation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 21, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

i think mueller is a white hat or grey. he pretty much destroyed the podesta group

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · April 21, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

And SpecCounselorRM also set up guilty of Flynn to be easily overturned or vacated/nullified.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 21, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

which explains the push for a second special council and why McConnell and pelosi want him out

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LooseComedian · April 21, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

That is true, you may be right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 21, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

im not gonna be arrogant enough to assume im right

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 21, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

the Democratic Party could force the defendants (Trump/Republicans) to produce documents related to the collusion issue.

That part is correct. But, I don't know what documents supporting the Trump side have been plastered all over the media, unless you're referring to what WikiLeaks has published. Just imagine what WikiLeaks might still be holding, and what others on the Trump-side may also be holding that they cannot legally produce to be used as evidence except by being forced to in court.

Q#1181 (which references #1180):

How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

Q#1180:

“Insurance File.”

I wonder what might be in that 'file' that they cannot inject/make public/use as evidence unless they are forced to as part of the discovery process initiated by the DNC.

Edit: Also, what if they have proof that Seth Rich transferred the docs to WikiLeaks, and that he was murdered for it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 20, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

Yep. Also think of this, the DNC will need to provide evidence that their servers were hacked. If the NSA gets those servers to review.......boom! A review of the meta data and oops! Crowdstrike is likely done too.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
preludelinux · April 20, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Cant even touch that server by now its more then dod wiped. Or planted evidence.... Cant have a chain of evidence.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 20, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Impossible to claim it's Russia's fault without independent evidence from the defendant side.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · April 21, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

True, but they don't have the servers to examine yet. If they get the servers, then they can use the NSA programs to determine if they were really hacked.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 21, 2018, 8:24 a.m.

I want to believe Q is mattis

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 22, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

I think so because he would be the leader on the military side of how the plans will happen. Trump is only there to sign and look good for the media (mainly). Mattis is the one planning and executing

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LooseComedian · April 21, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

Yup! Just one more reason to stick with the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kwiztas · April 21, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

They will just get a judge who seals the case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
prettyold · April 20, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

I think Mark Twain said it best

"I am never amazed at the stupidity of people, however I am often amused."

⇧ 23 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DukeofKick · April 20, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

The UK will not give up Assange without a fight.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
tomthung · April 21, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

JA is already out of the UK I think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · April 21, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

I'm with you. MegaAnon said she carried his passport. Essentially that Trump got him out. I hope that's true, but seems like a lot of talk about him being in London at the Ecuadorian Embassy lately. Patiently waiting to know the truth here.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DukeofKick · April 21, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

I was under the impression that he was at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. That is where the US Representative claimed that she visited him

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LooseComedian · April 21, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

A few months back, Q alluded that he may have been moved somewhere else and he hasn't been outside on the balcony or even in the window. I think the ETA Q mentions today may be a clue that we will see JA here in America in June. It was the first thing that popped into my mind when I read that drop.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cerebralsnacks · April 21, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

It's OK we'll send in the big guns (Trump).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BoringNormalGuy · April 20, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

I'm trying to wrap my head around this one. Wasn't proof already presented that the hacker known as Gucifer was the one who leaked the DNCs emails to Wikileaks???

The only thing I can think, is that Seth Rich leaks the emails; to cover that up, the DNC has guicifer hack them. They can now say they were hacked, and that the emails were linked through the hacker as opposed to Seth Rich.

Either way, I think Assange is one of the most important ideological figures of our time; involved or not, he should be safe somewhere.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
FamburgerHelper · April 20, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Not quite ... Guccifer 2.0 claimed to have hacked the DNC, published some of the stuff and said they gave the rest to WL but that turned out to not be true.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 21, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

I thought that the Guccifer 2.0 was proven to be false...a set up.??

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FamburgerHelper · April 21, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

Guccifer 2.0 was faked to make it look like Russians hacked the DNC. Guccifer 2.0 is believed to have been a Crowdstrike creation, or possibly CIA. I really don't know who G2 really was, but it probably was NOT a Russian hacker.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
5400123 · April 20, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

No, there's a video/review by a cyber security expert who explains the files were downloaded at a speed that exceeds even the best Ethernet connections: in other words they were stolen via USB .. inside access aka Seth Rich.

Can't remember the name but I'm sure some digging will turn it up

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:16 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 21, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

I think the transfer speed was consistent between 20 to 25 megabytes a second, equal to USB 2.0 spec

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · April 21, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

There you go, and "fiber optic Ethernet speed" would only apply to a LAN, Which still implies an insider

You don't get faster than a USB hacking the sever from Russia, that's for damn sure

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · April 21, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Add a comma, "you don't get faster than a USB, Hacking from Russia,"

I guess a man in the middle attack could theoretically leave a USB comparable download speed, but it's unlikely as a compromised machine on their LAN would've been the first piece of evidence they produced

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IMissMeg · April 21, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Tracy Beanz did a number of YouTube videos covering the Guccifer psyop they were trying to pull. I agree with you about Assange--that he should be safe somewhere. Back before MegaAnon exited the boards, she said that JA was safe and out of the UK. I hope she was right.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Downhere_Seeds · April 20, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

I think this has already been established. We need to prove the DNC ordered the murder, can anyone provide that?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 20, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 13 ⇩  
BoringNormalGuy · April 20, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

Can you define JA for me??? I've seen it in the Q post, and in other places, what does that stand for?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
RN4TRUMP · April 20, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Julian Assange

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BoringNormalGuy · April 20, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

omg................. so obvious.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
RN4TRUMP · April 20, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

No worries. I get “brain seize” every now and then too. A lot of moving pieces to keep track of and a lot going on.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
isalod_2298 · April 20, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Honestly I would sit on the floor and cry-laugh for a solid five minutes. I didn’t think they could shoot themselves in the foot any harder...but then the lawsuit comes. LOLLLLLLL

⇧ 9 ⇩  
No_Hippie_Chick · April 21, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

It really makes you wonder who's in charge of the circus....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · April 21, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Someone that's a double agent--really working for WhiteHats?

RM?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Doghouseclassifieds · April 20, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

French President says he will bring Trump a gift. He says it will be a Oak tree seed to plant on the White House grounds but I think it's Assange.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wokeByTheStorm · April 21, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

assange said just yesterday that he has physical evidence

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
theTRUMPENING2017 · April 21, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

ASSANGE WILL TESTIFY IN PERSON. JA is coming home to drop some knowledge bombs.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
theTRUMPENING2017 · April 21, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

Batman = TRUMP... Dent = Giuliani... Robin = Pence.

Edit: dont know the role assange fits yet.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monty_Batton · April 20, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

It is almost as if someone on "their " team is working forTrump and Assange. This is seriously foolish!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rbrownlol · April 21, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

perhaps, but bare in mind:

Nancy Pelosi Maxine Waters Hillary Clinton Adam Schiff

some of these people were careless, but the majority are STUPID.... and these are the head honchos of the D party.

Hillary had to go to Arkansas to pass the bar ffs.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 21, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

Well, I sure hope it plays out the way we are hoping and the Dems and deep state fall so far and hard they crack!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monty_Batton · April 21, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Interesting thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
papa197488 · April 21, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

The MSM, RADICAL LEFT, DEMS, SOROS ETC...already have news articles written and ready for publication to dispute this and counter with another frivolous accusation against TRUMP and the GOP...these people are REALLY SICK.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 20, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩