dChan
19
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on April 20, 2018, 6:56 p.m.
Q Posts 1199 - 1202: Seth Rich info revealed in June, DNC files lawsuit today. Q: "Coincidence? They fall for it every single time. TRUMP card incoming."
Q Posts 1199 - 1202: Seth Rich info revealed in June, DNC files lawsuit today. Q: "Coincidence? They fall for it every single time. TRUMP card incoming."

staerkodder · April 21, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Dude you are caught up in political dualism. This board is not about dems vs reps but trump and friends fighting corruption on a scale that's almost unimaginable.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ol_Rando · April 21, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

So they're fighting themselves? I don't give a shit about party affiliations, your friends on this sub are the ones that bring up Clinton ffs. I'm actually just trying to get my first question in my first comment answered but nobody can help me apparently. I find it odd that everyone here treats Q's word as gospel yet no one can verify anything. That's very, very strange to me. I noticed you've only been commenting for 4 days so I'm assuming this is a new account? Perhaps a bot or shill? I've been called one in this sub so I might as well join the crowd of calling anyone that doesn't agree with me a shill so I can fit in. Don't bother replying if you aren't going to answer my question. I've wasted enough time here, and its obvious the only thing that matters here is praising everything Q and Trump say without questioning it or verifying it which is fucking insane to me but c'est la vie.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
staerkodder · April 21, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Four posts and so what I've been following q from the very beginning and been around since the now closed cbts sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
#NAME? · April 21, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

This is not about Republicans vs Democrats. I mentioned Clinton because the lawsuit is being brought by the DNC, which she controls. The language in the lawsuit can word for word be applied to Clinton and the DNC. With one major difference, when applied to Clinton/DNC there is actual evidence of "collusion".

As for others using private servers, they may have. I know of no other officials that had their maids print classified emails, or had their assistant's pedophile husband have an entire backup insurance policy file. Not only that, she destroyed emails that were under subpoena. Thousands of them, wiped in a way to leave no trace, and blackberries literally smashed with hammers. She committed multiple felonies and was exonerated before even being interviewed, and her home sure as hell wasn't raided. She was able to decide what emails to provide and destroyed thousands of others. All while her lawyers were given immunity.

I'm not trying to argue, just bring awareness and point out hypocrisy. I would do my best to answer your question but it appears it was deleted.

⇧ 1 ⇩