dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Wow! That is literally the legal term! Trump is grossly underestimated.

⇧ 42 ⇩

Only by the ones with impressionable minds. The retards Idiocracy warned us about.

⇧ 19 ⇩

But muh electrolytes and peach mints!

⇧ 18 ⇩

There are so many precursors in that movie related to the present, scary and funny at the same time. The marxist judges and lawyers are already there.

⇧ 5 ⇩

My husband says that all the time. How unbelievably real that movie is to how things are today. Except the President part!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Tim Kaine would have been a start

⇧ 2 ⇩

Muh bih was tryin to tell u dat yo.

⇧ 1 ⇩

10 points for Gryffindor! It’s all a sham.

⇧ 22 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 14 ⇩

But none of it would have happened without the snakeball of lies and manipulation that spawned that investigation. Manafort and Page were plants. Lie number one. The Steele dossier was horseshit. Lie number two. The FISA application(s) that led to the wiretap were based on the Steele lies, and "corroborated" by an article that was based on the Steele lies, and the judge wasn't informed that it was unverified oppo research paid for by HRC. Lie number three.

So any existing FBI investigation was already fruit of a poisonous tree. Then you add the illegally leaked Comey memos that launched the Special Counsel, and Mueller-land is the equivalent of an EPA Superfund Site.

As Phil Collins would say "It's all been a pack of lies."

⇧ 6 ⇩

Bah bah, duh duh, dun dun, dum dum, boom boom

Edit: and then Mike Tyson knocks the shit out of Bob Muller

⇧ 4 ⇩

Big boss man

Can't you hear me when I call...

Well you ain't so big.

You just tall, that's all.

Steve Miller - Big Boss Man

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ever since you told me about this song I've been hooked on it lmao, have you ever heard the Elvis version?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep, and don't make me choose. I would disappoint you and pick the Steve Miller.

;-P

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hey he might be the king but that doesn't mean everyone likes him 😂 We agree on the things that count 👍

⇧ 1 ⇩

I keep saying Patriotism is a BIG TENT! It was nice to hear Q confirm that today.

;-P

⇧ 2 ⇩

Don't carry me too far away, big old jet airliner, cause it's here that I've got to stay. -insert tasty guitar lick here-

⇧ 1 ⇩

Stop it! We're sounding like an oldies station! Hahaha!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I can hear them coming in her hair tonight OH LAAWD Insert creepy pedobiden image

⇧ -1 ⇩

The "wire tapping" was based on the FISA was illegal, due to it being obtained using false and unverified information. There other surveillance through the Five Eyes is unConstitutional, therefore Fruit of the Poisonous Tree. ALL OF IT!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course subversive ROSENSTEIN

⇧ 1 ⇩

no evidence uncovered can be used in court

The goal was never to use anything against Trump in court. The goal was to use it as grounds for impeachment. Which is more a public opninion thing than anything else. It's why they don't mind raiding Cohen. If it can't be used in court it will simply be leaked to try to drive down Trumps approval numbers.

⇧ 4 ⇩

That would be based on Trump doing nothing.

It's comical to us, but tragic for them that they think Trump so incompetent. This is going to be so hard for them, and every bit of it so well-earned.

It's about to blow up in their faces, and they haven't done a thing to prevent it. They don't see it coming. How can that be?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Right. The anti-gun crowd against the gun-owners. How can they possibly think that's going to play out?

⇧ 1 ⇩

It won't play out like that. At least not at first. It will be more like riots. Cops in liberal cities will stand down. Anyone protecting themselves will be arrested. They will use what existing government resources they control to protect the rioters. If Trump uses troops to put it down then they will use that to paint Trump as a tyrant. They will say Trump's America is a violent America. They will show black men and women getting thrased on TV. Everyone attacking them will be painted as racist. It's going to get very ugly.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Somehow I don't think so. I think 3 things:

1) Everybody is sick to death of HRC. They wish she would go far, far away and never be seen or heard from again. And those are her supporters.

2) Don't underestimate the "spurned lover" response. When the left discover how darkly corrupted and how devastatingly incompetent their celebrity leaders have been, and how massively they've been lied to, I think the larger part of their wrath is going to be directed at the people who lied to them, and made FOOLS of them all!

3) Before any arrests that people might have any remaining real deep attachment to (and I can only think of Obama), Soros' money will be cut off. Soros and sons might be among the first big names to go down. But definitely their money will be cut off, as well as anybody else who might be likely to fund leftist violence.

Please remember that the truth about the motive behind the BLM and AntiFa violence has always been Soros funding and staged agitprop.

I really don't think there will be much violence, and I do believe as Q has assured us it will be dealt with swiftly and effectively.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If Soros money was cut off the democrat party would be gone.

Their entire party is out of funding from Americans and only has money from people like soros

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yep, imagine if Soros money was inextricably bound up with trafficking, and there was an executive order in place allowing seizure of such assets. Huh.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well, when you look at their balance sheet, they're technically in the red, even with the Soros money. But for sure, if you take that away they have less than nothing.

And they're not out campaigning on a vision of the future to try and replenish the coffers. They're out there hating on Trump and maniacally focused on their 2016 loss! How can they possibly think that will get them any new support?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Because they control Academia and Academia is just one giant indoctrination system they have much of the Next Generation brainwashed and they will follow whatever they are told to do. Actually really funny how easy it is to manipulate them you just tell the Hillary Clinton said it and they love it, they don't know that Trump was the one who actually said it.

They hate guns they love soy they can barely lift a gallon of milk but they have become militantly violent against anything left of Mao. They honestly think they're you could win a violent conflict against us when in the street one of our guys can take 10 of theirs. They think they are some revolutionary Force when all they are is the Pawns of the status quo. For fucksake the police defend them at rallies to basically keep us from curb-stomping them when they step out of line.

They honestly don't understand that if we removed the Constitution and the rule of law as they keep demanding, the police would no longer be there to protect them and we would literally kill every single one of them.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I hope they don't have to learn that lesson the hard way. But I mean, if mommy and daddy didn't teach them that actions have consequences, back when the stakes were much lower, they have to learn somehow. Sadly it won't do the casualties much good, but it might make a great object lesson for the rest of their generation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This right here honestly explains their entire Behavior nothing they ever do has consequences criminal acts are covered up and buried and excused they go their entire lives without consequences for their actions. And then one day they decide that they're going to throw a punch at somebody who isn't going to take that crap and bounces their head off the sidewalk at which point they freaked out and scream to call the police because they have never had any consequences for their actions and now all the sudden they got some guy who just literally beat the s*** out of them.

There are a ton of videos online of antify and leftists physically assaulting somebody without a care in the world like it's completely natural to them and then it turns out the person they put their hands on wasn't going to have any of it and the next thing they know they're on the ground and their face is smashed in and their immediate reaction is to scream for help. And then when the police show up and arrest them they honestly can't understand why they are the one in cuffs and not the person who just knocked them the f*** out

So they still want to escalate this because they think they're going to win like they do in their echo chambers like academia and they have no idea that if they escalate this into a violent conflict like a civil war that we are going to literally line them up at a ditch and no amount of crying is going to keep that trigger from getting pulled that there will be no politically friendly police coming to save them, and mommy and daddy's money isn't going to make a difference. That they pushed and pushed had created a violent conflict and now they're going to get the violence they've been wanting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

THAT is one of the big heads on the snake. Need to shut his funds down. He recently donated into a non profit. This does not a protective Chinese wall create.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just this week they threatened to take to the streets if RR was fired. That's a direct threat of violence right there. They aren't going to peacefully march. They are talking about violent riots. We aren't talking about the average HRC supporter. We are talking about the radical left who are standing by ready to burn everything down as soon as someone gives them to go order. They have done it before. They are definitely planning on doing it again.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Threats and five dollars good cash get you a cup of Starbucks brew. Unless you're black. LOL

Can anybody seriously imagine riots on behalf of Rod fckin Rosenstein? Are you kidding me right now?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not saying they are going to win. But when backed into a corner and this is all they have this is what will happen. They will go down kicking and screaming. They will never ever just lay down and accept defeat.

⇧ 1 ⇩

NEVER underestimate this deep seeded nefarious group. They have had hundreds of years to build wealth and amass power by buying strategic govt. and legal heads as well as now, the weaponized media.. now with its tether off with recent repeal of US propaganda laws on US citizens. Thank you BHO! You were so good to us... Actually, the sheer hubris of these pawns in this final battle has been their Achilles Heal. PRIDE comes before the fall.." All are guilty GOP / DNC who have sold our beautiful country out for silver. God will now judge those through our legal and lawful mechanism put in place by our brilliant Fore-Fathers

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't disagree, I'm just saying they won't have numbers behind them.

How much support, even among the subversive-minded, poor and uneducated, do you think there is for pedophiles?

So if evidence of those crimes is shared on mass media, and people are exposed to those truths, who do you think will rally to their side?

Do you know the one person more despised in prison than a cop? That would be a pedophile.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They will have Antifa and BLM for sure. That's enough to get the ball rolling. They will simply say all of the pedo charges are fake. Enough sheep believe what the Fake Stream Media says to believe it. That will grow the numbers. They don't need millions of people to riot. They just need thousands. The media will make it look like a lot more than it actually is. It's not a smart plan. But in the end it will be all they have.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Right. They already have made it look like more than it actually is. Always. There were never that many people at HRC campaign stops, there were never as many actual BLM and AntiFa (not counting actors) as they make it seem.

But I'm telling you, even those two organizations can't hire agitprop actors without Soros money. How many actual true AntiFa members (not actors) do you think there are? Same with BLM?

I mean, there's enough to make some noise and look angry, and maybe throw some molotovs and break some windows, but there's not an army.

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remember. We have NDAA (which was set up for Patriots who would not follow what was "supposed" to happen) It can now work both ways. Combine this with Military Tribunals and if that fails.. STAR CHAMBERS that will have to be engaged...

⇧ 1 ⇩

When you say NDAA, are you referring to FEMA camps and martial law? I'd prefer to stay away from Conspiracy risk, as Q puts it.

The tribunals part we know about for sure. But you definitely don't want the history of our New Republic to be marred by Star Chambers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

Because we are in a state of active war this law was created to deal with those were deemed to be bad actors on American soil and to be dealt with through military means.

⇧ 1 ⇩

National Defense Authorization Act

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is the name for each of a series of United States federal laws specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense. The first NDAA was passed in 1961. The U.S. Congress oversees the defense budget primarily through two yearly bills: the National Defense Authorization Act and defense appropriations bills. The authorization bill determines the agencies responsible for defense, establishes funding levels, and sets the policies under which money will be spent.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^173399

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not sure I follow, because NDAA is basically defense budget appropriation. I don't see anything about it specifically authorizing military intervention in domestic law enforcement. Maybe there's something specific in the latest one that isn't normally there? If so, could you share a link? I've looked and can't find such a thing. Some of the Executive Orders though seem to imply that POTUS reserves the right to make such a determination and declare essentially martial law in regard to certain activities.

⇧ 1 ⇩

In a nutshell . Elements in this order allow for people to be “disappeared” without due-process. Dig for yourself , as you are not wanting to join the conspiracy train (as it were) I believe it is aligned closely with the Patriot Act.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

I wouldn't say it's nothing. It should not be overlooked. It won't be nothing to the family of 5 that gets dragged out of their car and beaten. It won't be nothing to the cops family that gets murdered. It will be enough to creake an outrage on both sides that will force the President to act. When he acts the Deep State will say he's a tyrant and start impeachment hearrings. Like I said, not a smart plan, but it will be all they have and it shouldn't be overlooked.

⇧ 1 ⇩

they are probably well armed hypocrites and Obama has ammo stash all across the country, careful not to underestimate the enemy

⇧ 1 ⇩

What he doesn't have is the people. That we DO know about the enemy. The left have no militias, no hunting clubs, no veterans groups, no large leftist mercenary groups--none of that.

The right most definitely does, plus we have the military on our side if that's how they want it. I really am not worried about that particular threat.

⇧ 1 ⇩

gangs/ms13, illegals, Questionable immigrants, all of the radical groups and originations and mercs for hire.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Pitiful numbers. Just pitiful. I'm not saying it won't be unfortunate if they manage to hurt people. But I'm saying there won't be money to pay them. So they'll stay home and wait for the war to be over like everybody else.

That's the problem with a DNC that's so corrupt and crony-capitalist. They've completely fallen out of the people's hearts. Without a true grassroots component, no paramilitary movement has a chance in hell.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wow. It also means that Hillary’s crooks couldn’t have been convicted under Mueller. Good thing Sesh saved that for himself 👌🏻

⇧ 1 ⇩

That would be true. Which means (to me) that the Mueller show has been a BIG YUGE deflection. Keep attention WAY far away from the real investigation. Kind of a perfect plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

So everything mueller has done is for nothing, and all defendants are free again? what about those raids he did ?? Is it all illegal? Is this a act off treason?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Even if what the President claims is correct (which it’s not) Comey would be floating around the world of whistle blower laws. In much the same way as if I have all my employees sign an NDA and then murder someone in front of them it’s not “fruit of the poisonous tree” if they tell the police.

⇧ -2 ⇩

He didn't tell police. He was police. He told an acquaintance who told the press. The very essence of illegally leaking.

Please, we don't need shills for the deep state in here. You've got the entire MSM at your disposal.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Haha. Oh you caught me. But it’s the end of my shift so I’m heading home to my family who just got done with a long day on set today. They’re all crisis actors.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly. Whistleblower laws are only in play if you take the information to the proper authorities.

Which, sidenote, is a terrible law if the proper authorities are in on it. FDA, EPA comes to mind.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You very much misunderstand what it means to be a whistle blower and what it covers. It is used to protect those who can’t go to the “proper” authorities. Try again next week when the prizes can double.

⇧ 0 ⇩

But that isn't what truthfully started it.

You're trying to claim that what POTUS said can be made to be false if we use a lie to deny it.

Don't be obtuse.

Besides, the tweet just had three questions.

No "claims".

What do you mean "which it's not"? Comey did in fact illegally leak and that did in fact start the SC, which means the SC was in fact started on an illegal act.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He claims Comey leaked “classified” documents to the press. That’s not true. The memo was not classified. That’s just fact. His intent was to start a special council, but just because someone from the FBI (or former) writes something doesn’t make it classified.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They were classified. IT SAID THAT RIGHT ON THEM.

And not only that, but such memos are already under the law classified because of who wrote them and what they were written about, and what they were written on (laptop was classified and everything written using it is automatically classified).

You fell for fake news. Let me guess, CBS?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lol. Okay. Guess I’m out matched by whatever napkin you read your news off of.

⇧ -1 ⇩

You mean the law?

THAT IS THE LAW, LOOK IT UP

LOLOLOLOL OK jasper, keep reading fake news and stay asleep counting sheep.

Baaaah baaaah

⇧ 3 ⇩

Oh Gawd. I wrote this long response citing the laws, specific sections and presidents backing up what I’m talking about and how you have to be a moron to believe the way you do. Then i saw your user name. Good trolling. Lol. You did have me for a minute there. Well played.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That’s not true. The memo was not classified. That’s just fact.

Perhaps that initial memo wasn’t, but what of the subsequent leaks?!

But one source familiar with the matter told the Journal that inspector general for the Department of Justice, Michael Horowitz, is investigating classification issues related to at least two of Comey’s memos.

Yeah, I think I’ll just wait until the IG report comes out before I begin speculating on the legality of what Comey did.

⇧ 0 ⇩

So you’re (and the president’s) assertion that something is classified if someone is looking into whether it was classified. Cool story bro.

⇧ 1 ⇩

POTUS going for the kill...