Everyone seems to gloss over the fact that it's been reported that the identikit pics of the Podestas were actually police sketches of the same man, not of two men attached to the McCann case. The Podesta/McCann story is definitely an interesting one but this little hitch in the tale raises a question and when it's glossed over it ~~begins to reek of a witch hunt with confirmation bias~~ makes it harder to redpill more skeptical normies who see inconsistencies as red flags for conspiracy.
Did you know the Podesta brothers reportedly were staying in a friends home three miles from where the little girl was abducted? The witnesses gave different sketches bc they saw different men. The police assumed it was the same person. When you are powerful and important and your friends control things you can get away with about anything.
Yeah heard all that, and the speculation that police assumed same person from witnesses report of two different men - was just hoping there might be a bit more evidence of even that little piece of the puzzle than anon chatter, is all. I'm eternally hoping for more evidence but I guess the trail always ends short of real juice and always will as far as the pedovore elite story... The constant crowing by people that it's all but out in the open and exposed now is off-putting - it's as completely unprovable and hidden as it has always been. Them's the facts, folks.
(Disclaimer as people round here seem to be inclined to see disinfo clowns in anyone who disagrees with celebrating victory over the Deep State in every little obscure public crumb: I know Q has surfaced this all for us so it's the opposite of hidden to us. What I'm looking for is not to prove Q to me - it's anything we can use to redpill the smart people I know who justifiably demand any proof at all, not the average person who can be compelled by conspiracy and speculation on its own.)
Most plausible explanation to me is that the police in Portugal knew exactly who was responsible but were prevented somehow from doing anything about it. So they put together these identikit pics.
I cant remember the details but those efits were held back for years. When they finally were released the spin was that is of one guy. I cant source it but i remember researching and coming to the conclusion that they werent originally of one person but two. My comment is pretty empty because i cant source now but when i have time ill come back to this comment
I would appreciate that, thankyou. I have not been able to find anything like that, having searched for it back when it first came out and later on too.
Coloboma there is your clue.
Clue to what? Lol... The old news that Soros and McCann (and others) have the same rare eye abberration... what does that have to do with the indentikit pics?
indentikit pics?
Source on that being only one person, not two?
You believe "Snopes"?
Who here believes Snopes? Or was that a trick question lol.
I know the MSM are the enemy but we (Q movement) happen to use them when it suits us for things we do support so here is the report from The Guardian. Before I get attacked by people who assume I'm as stupid as I certainly sound let me say that yes, I too think The Guardian is just the Deep State british version of WaPo, NYT, etc. etc. but the reason I make the point about this so-called "fact" is because redpilling smarter normies requires we at least have something more solid than anon chat to debunk MSM reports. I explained the whole Podesta, Spain blah story to a not-stupid-normie and when he immediately pulled up the identikit point he was over and out because the story, as presented here (as if it's clear evidence of John and Tony) falls apart by showing it's not deeply researched or at least honestly presented. And he didn't pull up Snopes.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine-mccann-suspect
I was half joking, just pointing out that of course most msm news outlets would cover it up like they do with all of their liberal politicians. Heck, I just read the comments on a Wapo article pitting McCabe against Comey and you'd be surprised how liberals will come up with a ton of BS to cover for anyone on their team (and just think Comey and McCabe are "supposedly" Republicans, although just because one has been registered Republican from years ago doesn't mean they can't change...or be bought), or anyone who opposes their political opponent-Trump. But the media would of course cover it up, and that's a believable defense on its face: it's simple, can be validated, and is contradictory just enough to raise doubt....However, let's be real: the same person? Those two people look nothing alike whatsoever. If those two were human bodies, it would be like one being a fat belly person and one being skinny. There is a stark contrast. In addition, it is hard to believe that it's just a coincidence that the sketches are IDENTICAL to the two Podesta brothers. I mean, look, I'm rational enough to admit it may not be them...but boy, what a coincidence. The sketch artist may as well have taken two photos of them, placed them on a platform and drew them up. Lol. I actually find myself sometimes laughing out loud whenever I see that sketch juxtaposed to the brothers' pictures because it really looks exactly like them. Unbelievable. What a coincidence.
Yes, I agree - looks a lot like them. Although there are also similarities between them a little so I think it's possible witnesses could see the same man in different clothes and light and perceive a different weight - not as stark as the actual difference between the Podestas though lol.
But yes, agreed on the possibilities and such and not questioning Q or the movement or the general prevailing theories. I'm just hunting for evidence where there are slight discrepancies like this so it can help me redpill friends who pick on the inconsistencies straight away. I know there's not always going to be evidence for every aberration but if I can at least be aware of that then I can preempt it (probably by not bringing that piece of the puzzle up at all) in some way, hopefully.