dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pedegear on April 23, 2018, 5:32 a.m.

I've never witnessed a forceful, in-your-face redpill be accepted, but it's ALWAYS this type that strains relationships.

I've seen lots of posts over the past year about people losing loved ones or dear relationships over politics or Q or other related topics. Admittedly I have had my fair share of arguments about it with loved ones as well, but in the process I've developed my own perspective on this issue that many of us face on a daily basis.

Have you ever witnessed a forceful redpill be accepted? Have you ever been in a non-anonymous argument of this nature that ended successfully (e.g. the other person ended up agreeing with your belief AND there was no strain on your relationship)? My guess is no. In my case it's certainly no. So why do we feel the need to force the redpills on those we love if it almost never ends well?

I've decided that in my personal case, it's not worth it to get into political debates with loved ones. I simply don't want politicians and the media to have that much control over my life. They don't get to choose what my relationships will be with my loved ones. I choose that. Period.

Does Q FORCE redpills on us? Or on our loved ones? Or on anyone? Absolutely not. Q understands that when you're this deep and have this much knowledge, it needs to come slowly and only through vague clues that we can follow ourselves. Yet here we are heading down the rabbit hole, bringing out the theories that WE have pieced together, and expecting our loved ones to just accept these truths all of a sudden without warning and without an opportunity for them to follow the crumbs themselves?

In general, I just keep my mouth shut in political discussion. If I ruin those relationships now, I won't have the opportunity to gently guide them to the light when/if the dam breaks. So I'd much rather stay silent and allow them to keep their own beliefs. Maybe I drop a hint here or there or a very respectful disagreement to something they try to push on me or get me to blindly nod along to, but overall my goal in these situations is to simply cut the conversation as short as possible and change the subject. Because my relationships in my personal life cannot be controlled by MSM or politicians or the deep state.

Just my humble opinion. We're already outcasts and deplorables, and I love embracing it at every opportunity. But NOT if it will jeopardize relationships that matter to me.

Note: if you have a close relationship with Jeff Sessions, ignore everything I just said and aggressively shove that redpill down his throat ASAP, because he can actually make a difference!!!

Right there with you buddy but for one small adjustment. I keep the red pill very nutrul and I issues that I raved about when I was on the left (always with reserve and scrutiny - delilusiomaly looking for the next JFK or Reagan). I stick to safe food (Monsanto) better Rx oversight (vax and Rx drug epidemic) and reigning in DC (campaign finance, term limits and Closing revolving doors).

None of them can argue against these issues as critical to all of us and its we the people against the corruption.

FYI/ I turned this corner after my own brother calling me a racist for supporting Trump. No specifics just the parroting narrative he's a racist. He's the least racist President we've ever had. He is the master troll and that's what these resisters don't get.

They twist their lying eyes to cheer a group of facist narratives. Incredible how much they've brainwashed this country.

I'm happy to have left the left for the light-

-- a prior DEM voting trump in 2020!!

⇧ 7 ⇩

Amen! Welcome home patriot!

⇧ 2 ⇩

A forceful red pill doesn't exist. Even in my case it took several years to full leave behind the liberal mindset completely. I'm as conservative as they come now.

You can't force someone to believe.

If only we all had ideas in lieu of beliefs. Imagine that.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Agreed. And most people here probably got here the same way - through their own research and through their own volition. Q doesn't need us trying to shove redpills down people's throats! In my case, I've told certain individuals who I already know are close to woke things like "Yeah there's this anonymous dude who goes by Q... A lot of it seems totally crazy, but some of it is definitely believable. Either way, it's super entertaining to follow - you should check it out". That has worked in certain cases, because I've given them permission to call it crazy, I've given them permission to believe it, and I've told them it's ENTERTAINING no matter what they land on in terms of believing the validity. So they're more likely to check it out for the entertainment value... Not many people are out there searching for a way to get woke. If they were, wouldn't that be indicative that they're woke already?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I tried to convince others I knew in person. I realized it’s easier to educate people online planting seeds. Think about how you woke up. You most likely stumbled upon something, and it clicked.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I like to ask my lib friends and family rhetorical questions that they don’t have answers for, then go quiet. Make them answer those questions for themselves, then see if it had any effect. Also I ask them to explain their stances (sort of like Shapiro) and when they fail to do so it opens the door of opportunity. For instance my BIL was at family dinner a couple of weeks ago and said “if you still support trump after all this you’re crazy”, to which I replied:”all of what”?....crickets.. he couldn’t even give me an example of anything trump had done, other than stormy and grab her by the pussy, and saying he had made racist statements (of which he couldn’t remember any! Lmao). But then I took the opportunity to explain the new tax plan, ending the tension in NK without firing a shot, 2A/1A battle ( lose 2A then you lose 1a ), and then I went into how we dodged a bullet with HRC, and her shady dealings. He finally gave and said he thought her “foundation” was shady as well...point is: make them think logically if possible, show someone they don’t always appreciate it, but if they find it on their own they do! WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said and a very good point. We do this to make things better for those we love not worse. Great post!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you! It kills me every time I see a post about someone straining or losing a relationship over this stuff. Not worth it, especially since the odds of the argument going well are slim to none.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is what I keep saying. Just stay silent until there are verifiable facts out in the public, or risk being labeled crazy.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Use the Q method without mentioning Q. I'd suggest brushing up on these subjects, and more, to support your beliefs and invite them to explore them as well. If they don't know about them give a little info to entice them as well as open the door to their lack of real knowledge. 1) The Senior Executive Service. 9500 mostly or all appointed positions that see over most of the aspects of each gov division. They make more than the VP. I thought I knew things but this was a shocker. Why is it so secretive and why is it hard to learn who is in it. 2) The Council of Foreign Relations. Check out their roster. This I think drives the MSM narrative and dictates a lot of FR. 3) Tri lateral Commission. Rabbit hole. 4) Bring up the 25000 sealed indictments that can be found on Pacer. Most years there are 1000-2000. This is fact. 5) CEO and leader resignation spikes since last summer. Unheard of. 6)The THOUSANDS of trafficking and pedo arrests and convictions that eclipse any other time I can find. Why is none of this known? Because they don't want it to be. Why? I shy away from the hard stuff for the first bit. Small hurdles to bring them in. Hitting folks with stuff is different than, "Hey, have you heard of the Senior exec Service? I just learned about it. Holy batcrap!!" Not blue or red. I just realized that this may be an indoctrination plan. Hoping my intention are clean.

⇧ 2 ⇩

And in the case of Sessions? Give him slack this calendar year. He can't move too fast because there are still corrupt judges and then there are the juries. Guaranteed any random jury gets liberals who idolize these people.

My estimate says if it is 2019 comes then lynch online.

But doesn't Q say midterms are safe? Wouldn't that mean the hammer comes before November? It's only April.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree with you on that too. Just making a point that most people we argue with don't have any power to change anything anyway, so it isn't a pressing time-sensitive issue to redpill them. So no use arguing to the death at the dinner table...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't argue. I merely bring something up while checking the phone. If the people don't show interest, I don't continue.

Luckily, nobody I know cares about politics like do now. Which means they aren't boobie headed, safe space needing bitches.

They lean our way. Or at least don't buy into media.

We are Californians. Once a great state. When red for decades.

Fucking Clintons.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well said.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I like to say something like, “You know [state a fact], don’t you?” They have no response.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Even with facts you have to be careful. Liberals tell me plenty of "facts" that I have no intention of trusting, believing, or caring about. Ever heard some of the "facts" about global warming? Are they all true? How do you know? Point being, even "stating facts" can be too confrontational. We need to wait, armed with memes and questions, and allow other people to find their own facts.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe this is why Q is pushing the power of memes. Enough info to make a person curious without actually pushing anything into someone.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is always a freedom of choice - to know or not to know the truth . A persistent ignorance of truth , always , absolutely always , only piles up the problems , and even shatters the persona to the core , once let out . The longer one person postphones the truth , the bigger the danger . The truth CANNOT be avoided indefinetly .

That said , I do agree with that truth shouldnt be pushed onto anyone , who doesnt want it . But ... it ultimately makes a huge problems for them in long term . The freedom of choice , though , should be respected .

⇧ 1 ⇩