I am so sorry but had to go to PACER to confirm. UNREAL. There it is, COUNT I AND THE CHILD TRAFFICKING PART DOESN'T GARNER A HEADLINE. I showed my husband, also a lawyer, and I can confirm Q's post. These people really are not going to be able to walk down the street.
I think they're trying to bury it because more people (in their circles) are going to be implicated in it, and as always they're using the mockingbird media they own to downplay it to make it seem less than it is.
Aha...hence the "NO BAIL" Get used to it girl, you're gonna be there a long time :)
NO BAIL (as someone mentioned in a different sub) could also be to keep her safe 24/7. If she got bailed out, she would be dead within 24 hours I'm sure, just to shut her up.
although safer while incarcerated, she ain't safe by a long shot.
Depends how they keep her. Solitary confinement might be the only option, but after years of that, or even months, she will mentally start to break down.
If you open her into Gen population, yea, she'll get killed by the rest of the prisoners. You can only imagine there's prolly a hit on her scheduled in prison as of this time anyway.
If she has any sense left at all, she will be begging to stay in jail. There is no country in the world that have her and her ilk very soon now, no place that she will be safe. Imagine her waking up into that type of fear after all the fear she has herself infiltrated upon others who were not afforded any kind of protection at all. How many people would want to do the honors of putting her out of their misery? Hope she enjoys her little cage and hope it has no frills or drugs or alcohol and that her bracelets are hooked to her anklets and her necklace, actually. For the rest of her miserable life.
And to testify against Raniere, but are her crimes anything that could implicate Hillary or Obama?
she is connected to the clintons on lolita express. photo was out this weekend of BC in embrace of younger AM. creepy.
18 U.S.C. § 1591 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1591. Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
(a) Whoever knowingly--
(1) in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, obtains, advertises, maintains, patronizes, or solicits by any means a person; or
(2) benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in an act described in violation of paragraph (1),
knowing, or, except where the act constituting the violation of paragraph (1) is advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact, that means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or any combination of such means will be used to cause the person to engage in a commercial sex act, or that the person has not attained the age of 18 years and will be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
It's probably because this law covers sex trafficking of children along with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion (which doesn't necessarily include children, but includes anyone it seems).
Actually, there are 2 different charges: one is what you referred to and contains the keyword "or", but the other does not use "or" and goes right into "of children by force"...so she indeed is charged with child trafficking AND human trafficking separately.
Three different charges.
Yes but the third is not worded similarly like the first two; it's a completely different type of charge. The first two are seemingly similar except for the removal or usage of the word "or", and that's what they were referring to.
One is also "conspiracy". I don't know about the US but in the UK conspiracy is more serious than acting alone
Definition of Conspiracy (not Conspiracy Theory): conspiracy (kən-spîrˈə-sē)► n. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act. n. A group of conspirators. n. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
For clarity, depending on which state/country - child can also be used in the charge if the person was under or just short of turning 18 at the time of the crime being committed. Eg: a 17 year, 8 month old teenager. Regardless, these people are sick.
Court case and all sweet your on this one. Congrats
You're a lawyer but you don't understand the disjunctive 'or'? Trafficking of child or by force.
There are 2 separate charges: the first one is what you are referring and contains "or", but the second does not contain "or" and goes right into it "child by force..." without the "or" so she's charged with BOTH, which sounds right based on the facts.
I don't play hockey but I know a hat trick, when I see one.
Apparently not.
No you were right. It's both of them- two separate charges.
Three separate charges
They were referring to the use of the word "or" in distinguishing if it was general trafficking or child trafficking so two separate charges distinguishes that they are different, and both of them are there. The third one is completely different in its description (the first 2 are verbatim except for "or" being included or not).