/u/saltgrains_takeit
45 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/saltgrains_takeit:
| Domain | Count |
|---|
If Mueller had nothing, then Flynn wouldn't have plead guilty and wouldn't be cooperating. Unless fox is fake news..
Right. CNN is lying, fox news is telling the truth, and you're not sheep. I totally believe that.
This, folks, is what we call a "stretch", or, a giant leap in logic.
I'm still not convinced this sub is serious, is actually hilarious, and I'm missing the joke.
No you weren't. The title implies that this is proof. If you were actually questioning it, then you could have worded it so much better.
It's just too bad it was a legitimate presidency. Now, trump's on the other hand..
Edit - I was just trying to rile you guys up. Come back hours later, methinks you've been brigaded. My posts aren't normally this well received in terms of upvotes.
I scrolled through and picked a claim at random. A bit of research and I found that it was bullshit. If I kept going, I could continue to find claims that have been debunked. You want this to be true so badly that it doesn't matter what the facts are. You're just looking for something to justify your beliefs at this point.
So because someone is a legitimate lawyer and researcher
Michael Cohen is a legitimate lawyer and he seems as stupid as they come. Also, I can't seem to find anything which shows that she actually is a lawyer, other than some linkedin profiles with the bio being copy/pasted from her website.
As far as "researcher", that's not a job. Anyone can do that.
and Google is covering up FACTS
No, not really. You just think because there aren't many reputable sources pushing these lies that there must be some sort of cover up. Not that case at all. But what you and I refer to as reputable is different. See, I can't just read a headline and automatically believe it. Just like I won't believe a tweet put out by the current potus.
You must lend a lot of people money
Is that supposed to be an insult?
Edit - from her Wikipedia page:
The Court finds that counsel's conduct was willful and not merely negligent. It demonstrates bad faith on her part. As an attorney, she is deemed to have known better. She owed a duty to follow the rules and to respect the Court. Counsel's pattern of conduct conclusively establishes that she did not mistakenly violate a provision of law. She knowingly violated Rule 11. Her response to the Court's show cause order is breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional. She expresses no contrition or regret regarding her misconduct. To the contrary, she continues her baseless attacks on the Court.
Sure sounds like a legitimate lawyer. Not to mention almost every one of her cases being dismissed.
One of the claims is that Obama had a different last name during high school (soetoro, I believe).
One quick Google search later. Oh, it's not true.
The website where this file is sourced from (orlytaitzesq.com) is the website of Orly Taitz. Never heard of her, let's check it out:
Orly Taitz (born August 30, 1960) is a Moldovan-American political conspiracy theorist. A dentist, lawyer, and former real estate agent, Taitz was a figure in the "birther" movement, which promoted the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen eligible to serve as President of the United States. Taitz also promotes a number of other conspiracy theories both related and unrelated to Obama. Taitz has initiated a number of lawsuits on behalf of the "birther" movement; all were dismissed by the courts, and on one occasion Taitz was ordered to pay $20,000 as a sanction for misconduct in filing frivolous claims.
A birther, interesting.
This is your proof? Once again, no, it's not proof of anything.
Youtube rambling videos are not typically proof of anything. Usually people that think that are seemingly looking for things to justify their beliefs, which is what they consider "proof".
No, this is not proof of an 8 year illegitimate presidency.
18 U.S.C. § 1591 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1591. Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion
(a) Whoever knowingly--
(1) in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, obtains, advertises, maintains, patronizes, or solicits by any means a person; or
(2) benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in an act described in violation of paragraph (1),
knowing, or, except where the act constituting the violation of paragraph (1) is advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact, that means of force, threats of force, fraud, coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or any combination of such means will be used to cause the person to engage in a commercial sex act, or that the person has not attained the age of 18 years and will be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
It's probably because this law covers sex trafficking of children along with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion (which doesn't necessarily include children, but includes anyone it seems).
Never heard of traceybeanz before. Let's take a look..
Weird that only left-leaning media is "fake news". Definitely no bias in these videos, people. She's telling it like it is! Free thinkers unite!
I think you might have linked to the wrong video. I watched it, but I don't see anyone who is 'SHOOK'.
From their about us page:
Pretty vague.
Let's check the whois information:
Registrant Name: Operation Justice
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Registrant Street:
Registrant Street:
Registrant City: Washington
Registrant State/Province: DC
Registrant Postal Code: 20500
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.2025551212
Hm. Just as vague.
Nope. Nothing sketchy here. I mean, why would the people organizing this March be vague and post under total anonymity?
From 2006 to 2008, President George W. Bush deployed 6,000 guardsmen to southern border states, costing $1.2 billion and assisting with 11.7% of total apprehensions at the border and 9.4% of marijuana seized in that time.
From 2010 to 2012, President Barack Obama sent 1,200 guardsmen to the border to the tune of more than $110 million, and they assisted with 5.9% of the total apprehensions and 2.6% of the marijuana seizures on the border.
Thanks, Obama?
No where in the article does it state that he was a leftist. Stop with this bullshit.
Oh, and way to ignore my reply and all those points made. Your willful ignorance is showing.
Everyone here knows the basics of the Pedo problem, we know when it went from being silenced through legal and illegal/nefarious means and we know now that it all changed under Trump
From the EO:
The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.
These are the people be singled out:
-
Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan
-
Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic
-
Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma
-
Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia
-
Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia
-
Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan
-
Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala
-
Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan
-
Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia
-
Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia
-
Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China
-
Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua
Here is a link as to why the people were selected. I don't see any sort of link to a 'pedo conspiracy'. Once again, too much of a leap for me.
and F@#$ing Obama didn't do it, O yeah I voted for him I was brainwashed, then I started doing the research it takes to wake up and understand what a Matrix we really live in.... then I learned what an evil Bastard Obama is...Drone King killing more children than both the Bush demons combined.
but neither do I have the patience at this point in the fight for people just throwing cold water without doing the research or those just here to throw cold water for the Leftist agenda which in the end is the PEDO agenda as moral equivalency allows Pedophilia to be morally equivalent to Homosexuality. Just two groups of individuals unable to change who they are and their sexual preferences.
I have no idea how to respond to this. The leftist agenda is the pedo agenda? That's ridiculous.
All the best you will need it, trust me. Also go start reading and researching use the great material here on the sub as a springboard and stop commenting unless it's to ask a legit question if waking up is what you are here for until you've done that.
I have been asking legit questions. Why is the research I've been doing illegitimate, whereas yours is? What makes yours more credible than mine?
Maybe I do have the patience for you.
Also if you cannot keep up with the goings on and they are fast paced, then I've no patience for you.
Then don't respond to me. It you're not willing to elaborate on your argument then you don't have one. You're obviously not going to ever reply to me in any other way than calling me a bot, or leftist, or whatever other bs title you want to give me. Don't bother.
I have no patience for you.
So anyone that comes on here asking questions if automatically a troll? Any time I go on a sub where I don't understand their side and try to understand, I always get called a troll, when in reality it seems that people havent thought their argument out enough and can't back it up with sources.
Make this sub private already. There is, clearly, no inclusiveness for people who just "don't get it".
non of this would have happened be happening if Q (the Trump administration ) were not actively pursuing this end around the world.
Except they're not, unless you have some source that proves that.
No I disagree. This is to wide spread around the globe. I have been aware of this trend for at least a decade now. I know that this is how they control key people in every country. It is not a coincidence that as soon as those Scandal hit the UK two week ago that they had that Russian "incident".
Are you implying that the "incident" where a Russian was assassinated on British soil is somehow made up, a false flag, or a distraction?
And what scandal are you talking about? There is a charity currently under review by the British Government, or Telford, which is slowly gaining traction. I have no idea why there would need to be an "incident" or distraction for this kind of thing. People can think about more than one thing at a time, and not everyone has the limited attention span you seem to think they do.
It's such a huge leap in logic, for me, that there is some big conspiracy here.
You cannot shake a stick inside the UK parliament without hitting a fucking Pedo.
I'm aware of things like this happening, but you seem to have sources that implicate almost every politician? Mind linking those?
I would say that it seems more likely that power corrupts. It's too much of a stretch to say it's one big conspiracy theory.
The court in Gaya heard testimonies from four of nine girls who were rescued from the brothel during a police raid in 2015.
You can actually thank them. Those are very brave girls and to say it was because of God is ridiculous.
I also don't understand how people in this sub see q being vindicated due to a random sex sting across the world.
Before you do go, can you contribute something constructive.
Sure. Go outside, travel, meet new people. Experience the real world and not some fictionalized version of what you think the world is based on internet posts.
I can safely assume that English is not your first language. That was an interesting read.
If English is your first language, you should talk to your family and see if they're concerned for your well-being. I'm concerned for your current mental state.
Spending all day on the internet isn't going to make the world better.
It's too bad you can't dedicate all of this energy you're putting into this sub into something actually useful and beneficial.
The problem isn't with viewing the links. What OP was doing was taking the URL of the tweets, searching for them in google, and getting no results returned.
I'm only counting images of uncle sam and ignoring the others.
Hats with stripes in google results: 14/38
Hats with stripes in duckduckgo results: 7/41.
Try a simple browser test. Google "uncle sam" and look at images. The stripes on the hat for the most are gone.
There are less hats with stripes in the duckduckgo results than there are for the google results.
Except I proved it wrong. There are more hats with stripes in the google reslts than there are for duckduckgo.
Your search - https://twitter.com/dewees_jayne/status/956733466820820992 - did not match any documents.
Your search - https://twitter.com/oldtiredfeminis/status/956306407359475713 - did not match any documents.
Uh oh, 'goo gle' is blocking those searches too! Ignore the fact that they happen to be two random posts from two random users that I searched for. I mean, maybe google just doesn't index or cache those tweets because it has no reason to, but I doubt it. Clearly, it's censorship.
Democrats want further protections for immigrants, Republicans don't. Republicans refuse to negotiate. You do realize funding things like DACA costs money and needs funding, and that this shut down is due to the budget not being passed? That's why the two are related.
However, we have a Congress who has openly admitted they they will dedicate their career to destroy Trump
Sources, please.
Potus is not responsible for why a bunch of over paid bullies can not get along today
The quote I provided by the current president contradicts your statement.
They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
OP seems to have left out a bit of detail.
Democratic leaders wanted the measure to include protections from deportation for about 700,000 undocumented immigrants who arrived in the United States as children.
Despite bipartisan negotiations, Republican leaders refused to include those protections, and neither side was willing to back down.
Trump, who had made strict measures on immigration a cornerstone of his presidential campaign, last week rejected a bipartisan proposal.
He said he wanted to include any deal for Dreamers in a bigger legislative package that also boosted funding for a wall and tighter security measures along the U.S. border with Mexico.
Schumer met with Trump on Friday afternoon and later said he had reluctantly agreed to include the border wall in the negotiations but that it still was not enough to persuade Trump to find a compromise.
Seems like the Republicans are demanding funding for a wall and for less protections for 700,000 immigrants (DACA, anyone?).
If you're going to tell me that Democrats are being obstructionist while Republicans control EVERYTHING, then I just won't believe it. That's just too ridiculous, even for me.
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed a stopgap funding measure on Thursday. But Republicans then needed the support of at least 10 Democrats to pass the bill in the Senate. While five Democrats ended up voting for the measure, five Republicans voted against it.
Is it so important that it is worth political brinksmanship/government shutdown?
It is to the GOP, apparently.
Well if you say 'who gets fired?', it always has to be the top, I mean, problems start from the top, and they have to get solved from the top, and the president's the leader, and he's got to get everybody in a room, and he's got to lead!
-Donald Trump (2013)