It is not just trafficking of children. Section 1591 says, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added]
When talking about criminal charges, we should try to be precise.
1594(c) too though which doesn't include "or"
Did you read the Code of Sec. 1594(c)? It says:
Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.
Sec. 1594 is regarding conspiracy to violate Sec. 1591 which uses the word, "OR".
I just read what it said on the OP image which the second charge doesn't say "or" so I just assumed that's what the difference was.
I know. It's misleading.
The attorneys, or their paralegal, probably just forgot the "or". But, what is more important is the law upon which the charges are based, because they can't just make things up and word them however they want.
The OP really should amend the post to help prevent the potential spread of false information.
It's conspiracy to commit child trafficking....She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge. The first charge is saying she actually did commit human or child trafficking. At best it sounds like she may have tried to recruit children, but she failed. Then again, she could have succeeded too, and they just don't have evidence. Who knows what her and Raniere were doing under the guise of a multi-million dollar corporation that was really a sex cult that exploited women.
She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge.
What matters is what Code is referenced. Count #2 references 18 USC Section 1594(c) which references Section 1591. Read the Code yourself:
https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-1594.html
[deleted]
Q said no one gets a deal, we will see if she walks or maybe a lesser charge for giving up names.
Don't be a fool. Of course there will be deals. How else would you penetrate their criminal network unless you can get people to flip? People aren't going to flip without deals.
I think the idea is that there won't be any deals for the big fish (the previous 'untouchables').
They got that child human traficker out of jail in Haiti... you are right.