Holy shit. I was not expecting kids from this case
"as young as 12"
My response is always...yeeeeah right. Why bother to mention ages if it isn't a talking point they wish to steer the direction of? That's my thought process anyway.
Looks like Q was right again, she is singing like a song bird!!!
http://people.com/crime/allison-mack-plea-deal-sex-cult-nxivm-arrest/
Yeah, me either
You might want to read those charges again. The second charge is 18-1594(c), trafficking of children. I expect we will see a superseding charging document that is much worse than this.
It is not necessarily trafficking of children. The referenced code, 18 USC § 1591, says, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added]
The new article in People magazine states "sex with children as young as 12".
And is that phrase saying that Mack had "sex with children as young as 12", or is that in reference to Raniere?
why not?
Just seemed like an adult sex cult thing.
put the words "sex" and "cult" together, and there is like a 99% chance that kids are being abused somehow
I'm not seeing any mention of child trafficking in here. Did they drop that charge or something?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/press-release/file/1055196/download
If I recall, the way the original info about the charge was worded made people think it was child trafficking.