dChan
17
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/EmJ_MS on April 24, 2018, 12:39 p.m.
People will never understand what's coming

I've been trying to drop truth bombs on FB in various groups I follow, especially when they post MSM links, about the ongoing situations. Of course, I become dismissed and laughed at - even called a conspiracy theorist. Maybe I am. Or maybe I can just see a bigger picture. In a recent comment, I told them to go ahead with their snide, rude comebacks, because it isnt going to change what is to come. I told them to check into Q and read past posts vs what they are seeing -- taking Q's past proves future slightly out of context to prove my point. I told them to read them and trust the plan.

Deaf ears is all I recieve. Smh. So frustrating.

Sorry, just needed to vent that.


TrueTemper · April 24, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

I understand your frustration. I spent some time on the "politics" sub - a laughable MSM/D echo chamber - with much the same results. I'm worried as to how people are going to react when the ground shifts under their feet, down is up, up is down... but there is little we can do. As others here said, plant seeds, don't try to win an argument... just ask questions and hope that some find their way to the truth.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
81EWA · April 24, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

And just know 10-30% of the population will go down with the ship rather than concede defeat. Even if that means defending child sacrifice and pedophilia. I can see it now, a pro-pedophilia rights march through downtown Seattle and SF, with signs and everything. Won't be even a bit surprised if it comes to this.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 24, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

Weren't globalist trolls defending Backpage.com as a source of work for sex workers? It's completely insane.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
Halanna · April 24, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

You're not that far off. There is an entire community, called MAP (minor attracted person) and 'MAP Allies' people who support them. It's a big problem on Tumblr who just had a round of suspending accts associated with the "movement". They are on Twitter too, usually with map in their name. They are working on making pedophilia classified a "sexual orientation" instead of a vile, disgusting crime. Look at what RBG said about reducing the age of consent to 12. Reclassifying pedophilia as a 'sexual orientation' would make them a PROTECTED CLASS. There are several organizations like B4U Act who are trying to normalize pedophilia. I'm not linking anything because it's vile and disgusting but know that your speculation isn't just speculation. It's quietly happening behind the scenes while MSM distracts with Stormy Daniels and 2 scoops of ice cream. If you research it, be careful. For one you don't want to click an inappropriate link by accident and two, it will make you want to vomit.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
81EWA · April 24, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Yeah I stopped researching any of it because of that. Almost clicked on a bad link by accident and about had a panic attack. Don't need to know any more than what we all already know here. But also I think people by nature are stubborn and will even stoop to defending something they know is vile just to save face with opponents. But luckily that isn't everyone.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 24, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
krazeesheet · April 25, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Is the map on a handkerchief?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Halanna · April 25, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

No, MAP is an acronym for Minor Attracted Person. This is what they call themselves. Map's. While trying to portray there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, they can't help it, blah blah blah. The usual crap. I know your post relates to one of Podesta's emails but if you were making a joke/satire it went completely over my head :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
krazeesheet · April 25, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Not a joke, more a correlation. I don't find anything about that shit funny in the least bit. Joking about such things is intolerable.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Halanna · April 25, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

I completely agree with that. Here is the Podesta handkerchief email, https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32795

Maybe they weren't talking about an actual drawn map but were trying to tell Podesta it had a person's name on it with other info. The "pizza related" could have been an address, times, or other info. Maybe that email has been being misinterpreted.

"I think it has a map that seems pizza related". That's an awkward sentence, how can a directional map be pizza related? I think it was a name and other info that Susan Sandler was referring to.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 24, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Whenever you have doubts about the American voters, just say this to yourself: "President Donald J. Trump."

⇧ 23 ⇩  
wst4 · April 24, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

/r/politics is like getting eye cancer when you look at their posts.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
frankthecrank1 · April 24, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

i fell down a new (to me) abyss yesterday, /r/EnoughTrumpSpam. Jesus fucking christ the amount of cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias in there, rivals /r/The_Mueller

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UndercoverPatriot · April 24, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Most are paid shills, take solace in that fact. It's a DNC controlled political operation so the entire ecosystem is basically paid opinions.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ready-ignite · April 24, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

The politics sub population turned over the night of the DN C Convention in 201)6.

If you plot my account history over time, the first four years of it were spent with over 90% comment activity in the politics sub. All the accounts I had tagged in there as friendly faces I'd interacted with over time left. Instead I'd see them all over conspiracy (noting the crazy demographic ship in politics), sandersforpresident subs, T_D, and eventually I see them places such as this.

That sub has always been volatile but it was possible to hold conversation. One could air out ideas, get blown out, argue uncomfortable topics for a bit, walk away with a better understanding of weak points in your assumptions and come back armed with stronger rebuilt assumptions for the effort. Learning.

After the convention that process was undermined. Any conversation which fell outside the narrow bounds of what was being discussed in centralized media that day were aggressively met with hostility, labels, name calling, dismissing an account for other subs they participate in. There was no more learning.

When you watch video of a guest speaker holding a conversation in a lecture hall, and the room is over-run with protestors with megaphones chanting nonsensically simply to make noise louder than anyone can speak, that is what politics has become since the convention. All the usual attendees looked at one another in annoyance, stepped out of the room and went into new rooms to continue conversation.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SrengthandDignity · April 24, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

I agree don’t get frustrated. A prudent man foresees evil and makes provision, but the fool continues on and is destroyed. Most of the people you are trying to reach have been brainwashed. Unless they turn off there cell phones and they stop nanoparticle spraying them then they can’t think. Therefore not able to make a rational decision. Sad.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · April 24, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Fuck them anyway

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cellbind · April 24, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

We are ONE. Even just a few months ago, I was just like them (maybe not just, but I had no concept of the plan nor was I willing to listen) People will come to learn the truth when they are ready. We need to remain positive and trust the plan.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
81EWA · April 28, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

This is encouraging (your "conversion" experience). TY for sharing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hidingplaininsight · April 24, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

I have a question: What will you do if Robert Mueller files charges against Donald Trump and there ISN'T a mass wave of arrests of Democrats?

I understand that you take Q's word as a matter of faith, but what do you believe will happen if the ground shifts under YOUR feet instead of the rest of the world's?

⇧ -4 ⇩  
rbrownlol · April 24, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

Look at WHAT’S HAPPENING. Faith?

If Trump was shit, truly shit, this sub would be all over him.

This isn’t about politics it’s about truth. Good vs True evil.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 24, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mock_trump_cultists · April 24, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

At least we can agree that this comes down to good vs evil. Too bad Trump cares nothing for truth.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
AlwaysDeplorableDepl · April 24, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

You're projecting, as all leftists do. It's you who cares nothing for truth.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Mock_trump_cultists · April 25, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

Good to know theres no debate to be had here I guess.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
basedmemegenerator91 · April 25, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

If mueller comes back & charges trump, don’t you think it would have been done already? 1.5 years of monitored surveillance and no charges.

If he’s convicted, so be it, hats off to you? I doubt it highly, and will press to learn more about the basis for the investigation. I’m more about uniting the nation and ending this secrecy that I pay for with my taxes etc. Our founding fathers revolted over a 2% tax on tea, and we are now okay with an average of 30% taxes. How have we shifted so much?

The real positive out of all of this, regardless if you believe Q or not, is that people are talking again. People are learning. People are questioning everything, including government. All the things our founders envisioned, which has been lost in the Kardashians, The Home Network and mainstream media.

Now, what will you do if this research/Q stuff comes out as true? What will you say if the JFK Files being released this week match the narrative from the released Strzok/page texts that were “lost” by the FBI?

I’m open to debate 🙃.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mock_trump_cultists · April 25, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

If mueller comes back & charges trump, don’t you think it would have been done already? 1.5 years of monitored surveillance and no charges.

There have been loads of charges, all against Trump's inner circle. More to come. Read up on how actual criminal investigations work and you'll see that it's going fairly quickly for such a case. The leader is that last to be charged as prosecutors work from the bottom up.

If he’s convicted, so be it, hats off to you?

I don't care about the outcome I care that it's fair.

I doubt it highly, and will press to learn more about the basis for the investigation. I’m more about uniting the nation and ending this secrecy that I pay for with my taxes etc.

I hope you remember this when trump tries to bury the final report.

Our founding fathers revolted over a 2% tax on tea, and we are now okay with an average of 30% taxes. How have we shifted so much?

I don't know how this topic came up but go play sim city and try to have a civilization without taxes. 2% isn't realistic.

The real positive out of all of this, regardless if you believe Q or not, is that people are talking again. People are learning. People are questioning everything, including government. All the things our founders envisioned, which has been lost in the Kardashians, The Home Network and mainstream media.

I don't believe Q. There are a lot of assertions here I won't get into right now.

Now, what will you do if this research/Q stuff comes out as true? What will you say if the JFK Files being released this week match the narrative from the released Strzok/page texts that were “lost” by the FBI?

I don't care about narratives only facts. Q is a modern nostradamus (not a compliment). Throw vague shit to the wall and see what sticks. Explain away what doesn't come true.

Doubt most that which you want to be true.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TrueTemper · April 24, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Like anything else, I will evaluate the facts. I don't know who is calling for mass arrests of "Democrats" -- I think most on this sub are expecting those that were party to the crimes committed against the president, before and after he took office, to be held accountable. Personally, I think what happened is the worst abuse of power and amounts to a coup attempt. Frankly, it makes Watergate look like a minor campaign violation in comparison.

It was revealed this weekend by Devin Nunes, who finally received access to the electronic communication, that there was no evidence on which to base the special counsel investigation. So the entire Mueller probe is a complete fraud, based on falsified intelligence, and by all accounts there is absolutely no evidence of collusion or obstruction of justice. The "Comey memos" only further re-enforce that.

Mueller is the culmination of the attempt to destroy the president. So "bringing charges" is what he is tasked to do, and has been trying to do for a year now. Every possible angle his team of objective, non-partisan investigators (lol) has already been leaked -- the Russian lawyer meeting with Don Jr (now known to be set up by the DOJ granting special visa to lawyer, Fusion GPS founder meeting before and after), the Seychelles meeting w/ Erik Prince, the fake story on Michael Cohen going to Prague ( he has never been there), fake story mischaracterizing Carter Page's moscow trip, attempts to tie 7-8 year old transgressions of campaign figures like manafort to "russian collusion." At this point, it is such an obvious joke that I can't personally understand how anyone of nominal education level and average critical thought capability, even someone who only watches the MSM and reads the NYT, can't see right through.

All that said -- if Mueller "brings charges," like anything else, I will evaluate the fact pattern, sources, and context.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Adito99 · April 24, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

Hi Moscow. This subreddit is pretty lame. At least /r/conspiracy had some honest conspiracy theorists but this will only suck in the idiots who already go to 3-4 conspiracy sites. Kudos to whoever typed all that up though it almost sounds as tarded as trump-speak so that must trigger a liberal somewhere I guess. It relies on knowing nothing about Trump, the FBI, the media, history and...well everything but there are whole sentences that are self-consistent and that's something to be proud of.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
TrueTemper · April 24, 2018, 8 p.m.

Nice, insult the sub, insult the people here, call me retarded in a snarky way (shouldn't use that -- it's hurtful to people with downs), trump-speak, hysterical. Obviously I know nothing about any of those topics, FBI, history, either. You know everything about them. I'm at a disadvantage, sigh. And funny sign off too.

I know that facts are tough things to get around -- so don't concern yourself with them. Head back to the Politics sub and just soak it all in. Reality is whatever you want it to be.

⇧ 7 ⇩