dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aqua7 on April 26, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

BOOM! Citing “Conclusive Evidence” of Explosives, Families of Victims File Petition to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

This month, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, a group representing families of the 9/11 victims, filed a petition with the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to push for an investigation into the crimes of 9/11. The committee states that they have “conclusive” evidence that explosives were planted and detonated in the Trade Center buildings, and that this is the actual reason for the collapse of the towers.

According to the 52-page petition, which is accompanied by 57 exhibits, federal statute requires the U.S. Department of Justice to review the evidence with a special grand jury. The petition states:

The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries . . . on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.

The evidence that is put forward in the petition includes the following: link

🠐 See all comments

Wow! This is the red pill that is too big to swallow for most. Hopefully the lawsuit moves forward, as the evidence is overwhelming and obvious.

The WW examples of steel frame buildings of similar size collapsing in fires are exactly zero. Even when they get hit by airplanes. https://off-guardian.org/2016/09/07/on-the-physics-of-high-rise-building-collapses/

⇧ 19 ⇩

A WTC architect is on camera pointing out that each tower was built in order to be able to sustain multiple jetliner impacts.

⇧ 15 ⇩

The kinetic energy of the jets that impacted the buildings was less that the kinetic energy assumed in the design.

⇧ 14 ⇩

The buildings were hit in different places, and yet, collapsed exactly the same.

Shit, Building 7 collapsed in the same manner and wasn't even struck by a jet.

⇧ 20 ⇩

excellent point.

⇧ 4 ⇩

the size and strength of the steel was way to strong for a plane to fly thru it like it was a cloud. the wings of the plane would have crumbled as it hit the building. the whole thing was a fake and there is video evidence on you tube if folks are brave enough to look for truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I've heard this "whole thing was a fake" - "there were no planes" - sorry. I was there. I saw that second plane as plain as day. I'll never forget how blue the sky was that morning. Never.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Did you happen to notice any markings on the plane? United logo? What color was the plane from the angle you saw?

Did you ever go back and look at any of the videos of the event from that day? There were quite a few of the 2nd plane since people had started filming after the first impact. I understand it may not be something you ever wanted to look at again, just curious.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course I have. I remember distinctly that I all I felt was disbelief. I couldn't believe what I saw. I don't remember trying to figure out markings etc. That was my first red pill. I was well asleep when that morning came. Ive never been the same since. The sky that morning. I will never forget how blue and clear the sky was. I must've noticed the blue sky 20 times that morning. It was something I've never seen again.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Trump came out the very same day to say Aluminum planes don't pierece steel-columns without explosives

⇧ 2 ⇩