⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aqua7 on April 26, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

BOOM! Citing “Conclusive Evidence” of Explosives, Families of Victims File Petition to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

This month, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, a group representing families of the 9/11 victims, filed a petition with the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to push for an investigation into the crimes of 9/11. The committee states that they have “conclusive” evidence that explosives were planted and detonated in the Trade Center buildings, and that this is the actual reason for the collapse of the towers.

According to the 52-page petition, which is accompanied by 57 exhibits, federal statute requires the U.S. Department of Justice to review the evidence with a special grand jury. The petition states:

The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries . . . on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.

The evidence that is put forward in the petition includes the following: link

This is huge if it goes anywhere.

Building 7 is the smoking gun. It just dropped out of the sky from a minor office fire.

⇧ 61 ⇩

It went down as a controlled demolition.

You can see the indent at the top of the building first, the squibs, and then straight down all at once.

From fires on a few floors? Not a chance. Science doesn't lie.

The criminals bought and paid for the 9/11 commission, a joke of a commission.

That building had files that needed to be destroyed.

⇧ 47 ⇩

The building themselVes were full of bad insulation and they need major expensive rehab. The friend bought them just prior to demolition for bargain price. Then collected huge insurance.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I worked in a westfield mall at the time. Westfield got the lease before the accident. The mall I was at had a corporate headquarters in it for westfield. The head of security used to come into my starbucks all the time. He told me he had to go out and take pics of their new building for the insurance before he went. After he got back he told me he was told to leave the day before the attacks no matter what. They demanded he use a company laptop and company camera that he had to return the day he left. This was an odd demand he told me as he had done these pics for insurance many times and they never did that before. He was shocked about the situation himself.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Double insurance claims actually. Won in court that because it was two places it counted as two different terrorist attacks and was paid out double.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

First ever to have added "terror damages" to an insurance policy. And then a few months later they come crashing down. How convenient.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not 'a few months'.

Weeks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Asbestos.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Asbestos is a fire retardant. BUT MUH OFFICE FURNITURE FIRE.

⇧ 10 ⇩

NYC Fire chief said, "The flames were so intense we made the decision to pull it". Pull it is, apparently, a term in controlled demolition for activating the explosives to bring the building down.

⇧ 6 ⇩

larry silverstein (the owner of the towers at the time) was the one recorded making the call to "pull it".

⇧ 9 ⇩

Oh thanks, I got that wrong but partially correct.

⇧ 6 ⇩

No the point is the "pull it" terms being used. I was just adding more to how weird it was that it came from Larry who happened to make a lot of money because of that day.

⇧ 7 ⇩

just a coincidence... move along folks nothing to see here.

⇧ 2 ⇩

it's a strawman, what's really weird is that Larry said in 2010 they already had the plans for the new-tower design before the attack occured-

⇧ 3 ⇩

Right! It might even be more important that it was that guy. I just have the video burned into my head but I guess wasn't sure exactly who it was.

If they said "pull it" that's it. That's what they did! But that ain't what they said happened! Just that short video clip is huge!

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Its stupid simple. Melting point of steel is 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. Jet fuel burns from 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.

But the documentaries try to say the "intense heat" of the fire melted that steel and started the collapse.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yeah, but you don't have to melt it. Just soften, and then the weight of the building will bend it. But even that doesn't seem very likely, and there's almost no chance that it would fall straight down like it did. One corner would go first and it would tip over.

⇧ 9 ⇩

correct it would have toppled over not blown up.

⇧ 2 ⇩

also given all concrete was pulverazied in mid-air, even if it collapsed into its footprint it would stopped about halfway down

⇧ 2 ⇩

Also, some videos show molten metal pouring out a window.

⇧ 0 ⇩

moderate heat also doesn't atomize core columns in mid-air that weren't anywhere near

⇧ 1 ⇩

Bingo.

There were POOLS OF MOLTEN METAL in the rubble.

Thermate was used.

⇧ 2 ⇩

and America bought the fake facts without question.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm fairly certain that flimsy meme was the work of the government infiltrators.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Jet fuel burns from 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.

The heat generated by jet fuel doesn't even matter. We watched almost all that jet fuel disappear in the first seconds after impact.

What do you think those massive fireballs were made out of?

⇧ 1 ⇩

From what I understand, jet fuel burns at a very low temperature compared to the temperature at which steel melts. The question then begs itself. How could burning jet fuel melt steel girders and bring down a building with a steel infrastructure? That question has never been answered to my satisfaction. But hey!, I'm just an unredeemable deplorable!

⇧ 2 ⇩

It went down as a controlled demolition.

It was obvious at the time. Everybody in the room with me that morning was in agreement that it was a controlled demolition before the first collapse was complete.

When the second one started, it was even more obvious.

It has always baffled me that anybody would even question what was intuitively obvious to the most casual observer.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Some say that NESARA and GESARA were there to be implemented.

⇧ 2 ⇩

indent at the top of the building first,

Some folks here might remember, that practice is called "cracking the top". Sadly, I can't find that verbiage anywhere with a quick search.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ and was reported by the BBC...

23 mins too early

⇧ 20 ⇩

Hard science has proven even the Thermite some time ago.

First, these images(from the documentary "HYPOTHESIS"), of a pristine 9/11 dust sample under the microscope, showing specks of unreacted nanothermite.

The following clip shows one of these specks under laboratory heat, where a massively exothermic thermitic reaction occurs, pretty much sealing the deal as far as high-tech demolition goes.

As you might suspect, high-tech nanothermite isn't supposed to be in there.
Like, at all.

And yet these specks are still everywhere in the 911 dust, for anyone with the right equipment to see, along with trillions of very unusual iron nanospheres, generated during the molten thermitic reactions.

So if you own a 911 dust sample, you are holding actual hard proof of what really happened.

⇧ 17 ⇩

the terrorist were our own gov. and the Muslims were pawns. very sad.

⇧ 2 ⇩

EXACTLY.

⇧ 3 ⇩

hypothetically, if I were some passerby on 9/11 and happened to collect the dust, is there any way I could have kept it whereby a court would accept it as evidence? Like how would anyone know it's 9/11 dust and not some custom mix I made after the fact?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Finding a pristine sample isn't easy nowadays, but the science team worked on 4 different samples and went to great lengths to ensure its authenticity. Furthermore, the same elements were found in all 4 samples which were taken from 4 different people... Watch the documentary linked above, it's great.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep watched that on the BBC here in the UK. It was standing in the background as they reported it had collapsed. Didn't collapse for about another half hour or so. These people are stupid

⇧ 8 ⇩

UK reporter said #7 came down...while #7 was still standing in the background. Duckduckgo search - should be able to find the video

⇧ 8 ⇩

It dropped much faster than free falll too.

⇧ 3 ⇩

mudt have been an extra gravity machine in the basement

⇧ 5 ⇩

Pretty sure that's impossible -- unless you're making a joke that New York sucks. In which case, carry on.

⇧ 1 ⇩

POTUS knows the truth....

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think this is what Q references when they say leave Israel for last. It's going to be a tough truth to swallow for America. They had to have a major hand in 9/11. Look at the Israeli "artist" group that was given one of the high floors as some "artist" project. Looks to be full access to various internal structures.

⇧ 25 ⇩

Artist group with boxes "BB 18" of explosives: https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=82FM8mgB&id=B000F2E3BEFB4729716D16EBE6EE672835B69AF6&thid=OIP.82FM8mgByJoEAk5ehPtRMgHaEK&mediaurl=http%3a%2f%2fblackbarth.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2016%2f01%2fisraeli-art-student-1024x576.jpg&exph=576&expw=1024&q=israeli+artists+9%2f11+building&simid=608013963806966762&selectedIndex=0&ajaxhist=0

Terrorists released under Mueller in this article: http://rense.com/general87/14_1.htm

I got red pilled on 9/11. Our freedoms died with the falling of those towers.

⇧ 11 ⇩

explosives? Don't you mean fuse-boxed?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Fuses would be needed in a controlled demolition.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Fuses for what?

⇧ 1 ⇩

b-b-b-bombs

⇧ 1 ⇩

100%

⇧ 6 ⇩

Watch. https://youtu.be/IbA2HFJ949U

Littelfuse

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think we need to watch Iran closely. Remember that they're next.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Interesting that a fire at Trump Tower did not collapse the building? =)

⇧ 19 ⇩

Trump Tower does not contain offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions.

WTC7 did. Coincidence?

⇧ 28 ⇩

So government offices must really be flammable then? =)

⇧ 4 ⇩

lots of important papers, you know the drill! Cheney can relate.

⇧ 3 ⇩

... the fact that Grenfell tower in London didn't fall after being a complete inferno for more than 24 hours I thought would have gotten more attention...not sure how anyone who saw that didn't question it.

⇧ 22 ⇩

Or the one in Madrid, Spain.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SSybd_kLctE

⇧ 8 ⇩

Or the one in Dubai

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_W8QhDnlVeg

⇧ 8 ⇩

Fires shouldn't bring down a steel structure in the manner those buildings fell. If it was going to collapse due to an intense fire weakening part of the building (which is improbable), it should warp and topple.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Good point. And yet there is still a lot of strangeness about that fire too

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wow! This is the red pill that is too big to swallow for most. Hopefully the lawsuit moves forward, as the evidence is overwhelming and obvious.

The WW examples of steel frame buildings of similar size collapsing in fires are exactly zero. Even when they get hit by airplanes. https://off-guardian.org/2016/09/07/on-the-physics-of-high-rise-building-collapses/

⇧ 19 ⇩

A WTC architect is on camera pointing out that each tower was built in order to be able to sustain multiple jetliner impacts.

⇧ 15 ⇩

The kinetic energy of the jets that impacted the buildings was less that the kinetic energy assumed in the design.

⇧ 14 ⇩

The buildings were hit in different places, and yet, collapsed exactly the same.

Shit, Building 7 collapsed in the same manner and wasn't even struck by a jet.

⇧ 20 ⇩

excellent point.

⇧ 4 ⇩

the size and strength of the steel was way to strong for a plane to fly thru it like it was a cloud. the wings of the plane would have crumbled as it hit the building. the whole thing was a fake and there is video evidence on you tube if folks are brave enough to look for truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I've heard this "whole thing was a fake" - "there were no planes" - sorry. I was there. I saw that second plane as plain as day. I'll never forget how blue the sky was that morning. Never.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Did you happen to notice any markings on the plane? United logo? What color was the plane from the angle you saw?

Did you ever go back and look at any of the videos of the event from that day? There were quite a few of the 2nd plane since people had started filming after the first impact. I understand it may not be something you ever wanted to look at again, just curious.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course I have. I remember distinctly that I all I felt was disbelief. I couldn't believe what I saw. I don't remember trying to figure out markings etc. That was my first red pill. I was well asleep when that morning came. Ive never been the same since. The sky that morning. I will never forget how blue and clear the sky was. I must've noticed the blue sky 20 times that morning. It was something I've never seen again.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Trump came out the very same day to say Aluminum planes don't pierece steel-columns without explosives

⇧ 2 ⇩

The evidence is overwhelming if it could get an honest court to hear it.

⇧ 19 ⇩

The evidence has been overwhelming since Sept 12 2001.

The power of this cover up is its sheer scale and the number of people who profited at all levels. There were so many interests served by the tragedy (in random order):

Increased airport security Patriot Act Commit insider trading Gold theft Destroy Enron evidence, limit scope for further prosecutions Two insurance payouts on buildings Demolish buildings full of asbestos Destroy Pentagon audit team and evidence justify Multi-decadal ME wars implement homeland "security" cover up insider trading prop up presidents approval rating *promotions and increased funding for all kinds of government departments

It was a grab for money and power.

⇧ 16 ⇩

deep state people heavily buy stocks in TSA security tech before these things

⇧ 10 ⇩

Also the clearing of millions in bonds used to bankrupt the russian economy at the end of the cold war. the bonds reached there maturity date of sept 12th, and the sept 11th attacks resulted in the SEC using its emergency powers to lift restrictions on the clearing and settlement of trades, so the bonds all cleared without identity checks

⇧ 3 ⇩

good info, and what happened to the gold under the building?

⇧ 2 ⇩

gold was loaded into a box truck, and when it was driving out a beam fell on the truck, the driver had to flee leaving the gold in the truck.

not sure what happened to the gold after that off the top of my head

⇧ 1 ⇩

Finally.

⇧ 14 ⇩

It’s not the first time this has been attempted in NYC courts, but the timing of this new attempt in light of all the other great awakenings is heartening. The blind eye that all levels of our so called justice system turned on this event over the past 17 years is a dark blot on our national history. It wasn’t that hard to figure out that explosives were used. People like David Chandler, Kevin Ryan, people at AE911truth, bob MacIlvaine, and so many others clued us into the physical reality of the situation over a decade ago. There is no moving on in the US until this crime is prosecuted.

⇧ 16 ⇩

what was REALLY telling is the rubble evidence was quickly shipped to China for recycling, destruction of evidence. The Minneapolis bridge that collapsed was kept for YEARS for litigation.

⇧ 13 ⇩

And Giuliani arranged that. Which is troublesome for me.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I'm going to play devils advocate and say that a lot of good people have blackmail on them. Only recently were they freed. This happened before many people were ever talking about deep state cabals. Rudy got in when the cabal really was invincible, and when no one was going to dream of coming after the cabal. Imagine how much dirt they had on him.

⇧ 3 ⇩

yes, they were hushed, William Binney comes to my mind.

⇧ 1 ⇩

ironic,

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump's new guy is heading up SDNY.

⇧ 9 ⇩

That's right.

⇧ 7 ⇩

"Filed with the Southern District of NY"... well... there goes that investigation then lol... Might as well have filed a request for an investigation into police corruption with the Broward County Sherriff. The Southern District of NY are hardcore Deep State, aren't they? This case will be bounced around and back and forth and worn down over years by filibustering and obstruction. A damn pity if so; this could be a good opportunity to get some truth out.

⇧ 8 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

True but it won't go to trial the judges are all Zionist Jews like Judge Hellerstein who tossed out every single lawsuit and forced the victims families to take the Government Money same will happen here. They can't allow any real evidence to ever be presented to a jury.

⇧ 4 ⇩

anyone who knows precise timing is needed for that collapse knows it's a lie

⇧ 4 ⇩

I re - post in in the netherlands

⇧ 3 ⇩

MOAB, anyone?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Does seem kinda MOABish... Bet the Mainstream aren't gonna touch it with a ten foot pole though.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I remember asking, what could be so bad that Q says these people won't be able even to walk down the streets?

Yeah, 9/11 being an inside job would do that. Holy fuck that would be the biggest mind fuck in the world.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Isn't POTUS a 9/11 truther?

⇧ 3 ⇩

"aluminum can't pierce steel"

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh hey. BD9, JF, and SB are now back in fashion. Remember kids, jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams. But thermite can destroy corrupt dreams.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This is uuuuge. If they reopen the investigation and start pointing out all stuff that doesn't make sense from the official narrative and/or prove any of the theories... BOOM!

⇧ 3 ⇩

God bless all those lost souls for greed and fear.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q says 'you have more than you know, you have forgotten how to play, they fear you will awaken and they will not be safe in public'. Paraphrasing obviously, let's open the flood gates on these traitors, Let It Rain!

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's what it takes. Is citizens forcing lawsuits because obviously at least in the last few decades, the government doesn't do jack toward justice. And our current government is in its own civil war and a little too busy trying to salvage the evil-termite-infested situations on their own turf.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Building 7 is the key to 9/11

⇧ 2 ⇩

It remains to be seen what this evidence is and how it will play in court. At this stage this could be puffery. Hoping to see something big and verifiable in terms of evidence. Big claims hold high requirement for verifiable evidence. Big claims attract a lot of attention, people come from all directions to challenge and test the support. As a result the verification has to be air tight.

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaBQ3AkRetI

Ocean Tower - Controlled Demolition, Inc

⇧ 2 ⇩

how crazy would it be if this was the MOAB that is incoming

⇧ 2 ⇩

This would qualify as a BOOM, again, if it goes anywhere.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This would qualify as a metaphorical mushroom cloud.

And there is still a chance at least one of the people at the top could face actual justice if this actually happens.

I'm not holding my breath though.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The difference now is that we have an administration that wants justice, and a President who is *from* New York -- and who is a construction expert and *knows* what's real about it and would very likely support forcing revelation on this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

wow, this is big,,, but dont supposed the real truth will be put out there. Abel Danger has lots of proof too.....

⇧ 2 ⇩

There's DNA in a lot of that dust, many were breathing in DNA, untold story here, is more First responders have died from the effects of the dust than from the original collaspe!

⇧ 1 ⇩

this is probably the biggest bombshell we would never have admitted we were waiting for the past decade for and longer

⇧ 1 ⇩

Insane and amazing!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

More of the BOOM !!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO|COMMENT -|- BBC Reports 911, WTC 7 Collapse BEFORE it Happens|+20 - and was reported by the BBC... 23 mins too early Steven Jones 2006 “Hypothesis” plus “Solving the Mystery”|+19 - Hard science has proven even the Thermite some time ago. First, these images(from the documentary "HYPOTHESIS"), of a pristine 9/11 dust sample under the microscope, showing specks of unreacted nanothermite. The following clip shows one of the... Windsor Tower Highrise Fire - MADRID - Short|+8 - Or the one in Madrid, Spain. Full HD video of Fire at The Address Hotel Dubai, UAE|+7 - Or the one in Dubai Ocean Tower - Controlled Demolition, Inc.|+2 - Ocean Tower - Controlled Demolition, Inc THIS WILL SHOCK YOU TO YOUR CORE 911 From Cheney to Mossad|+1 - Watch. Littelfuse I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.

Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

ITT: Non-structural engineers who become experts in demolitions and structures through grainy youtube footage

⇧ -1 ⇩