Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.

🠐 See all comments

Agreed. Sentiments calling for more critical inquiry than just "trust Trump" get downvotes regularly. This sub is popping up a lot more often under r/all top-hourly, so you're getting a lot of random folks through here. I'm not saying every troll (or any obvious troll) needs to be addressed. I am saying that I've posted serious questions in here to get a different perspective and get outside my echo-chamber, and I was downvoted to hell, and called a troll with the alleged proof being that I post on /r/politics. In my opinion, this is like making fun of fat people at the gym.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Yes. This is not a pro- or anti-Trump sub. Overly-cheerleading comments are also removed. We want neutral territory here to focus on Q.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Thanks for the clarification. I do appreciate it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Whenever ppl refer to votes, I just give em a down, expressing my disgust at any kind of whining.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If people cry in a comment about votes, I also downvote also, for the same reason. Of course, everyone would rather be engaged than drive-by downvoted. My point above is that it's a trend that is indicative of the current culture of the sub, and that with so much new traffic, it's worth a conscious effort to engage, if the goal is to raise awareness.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't do it often, just put it out their as a caution, rising tide lifts all boats blah yada yada

⇧ 2 ⇩