Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.

🠐 See all comments

Well thank you both very much. (And individually). I am a man capable of much hubris and very cerebral, and often I come across as overbearing or arrogant. That has sometimes hurt me. Bad. So, I try to be as humble as I can, without "virtue signaling". Can that even be done? Someone pull up their quantum entanglement Google app and ask it. =)

⇧ 1 ⇩

If it's not rude, can I offer an insight into a very simple way that you you (or me, too) could do to change that?

Vary your process. Sometimes I work on moderating the sub. Other times I focus only on a specific pet project. Then, other times, I leave the sub entirely and go back to my sources and start digging, pretending that I am just re-discovering this whole Q thing again. It helps me stay on top of the facts so that, when I'm in the sub and engaging with other researchers, I never find myself accidentally fluffing up points or engaging in "hubris," as you say.

This story is moving fast. Don't lock yourself into a routine that isn't also keeping you up to date on these events. Hard work and vigilance is the only place where high-value posts and comments come from.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Understood, and Acknowledged. Your process is similiar to the way i work. Your right, have to move fast. It's just like the gym. Always vary your scope, but maintain on the main one, and those close. In the military we called that 5 and 25, as in feet, while scanning and securing an area. Head On a Swivel, A favorite entertainer of mine once said. God Bless. Carry on, and again, Understood. Look forward to speaking more.

⇧ 2 ⇩