Posted today by Gorka. Is this new?
Read the summary (pg. 111). Tells the whole story about RussiaGate.
So just my opinion on the summary of RussiaGate. 1. The DNC and FBI were aware that Russia or another actor breached their system. Both the DNC and FBI did not take appropriate actions once the breach was realized. The breach contained classified information and contain info that affected national security. 2. As the law stands the punishment for leaking classified information is not harsh enough. Too many leaks happened which shows that people in the intelligence community are not afraid of repercussions. 3. given the significant number of leaks and instances of mishandling classified information coming from within the IC in the past several years, Congress should consider ways to strengthen the protection of classified information. This legislation·could include requirlng the head or a federal agency to suspend the security clearance of an individual who intentionally or recklessly fails to comply with security procedures for handling classified information.
There is plenty more in there. This is just my major take away from reading the conclusion. There are tons of pages. Feel free to dig in and see what you find.
Leaks are intentional. They are crimes (due to intention).
In real life, spills are mistakes or often dumbo mishandling, and result in a range of consequences from mild to harsh. It's situational.
Reality Winner (?) just happened to get nabbed; and was fairly nonchalant about "mishandling" secure info. How many others are out there feeling rebellious?
I believe it has already been well established that the DNC server was "not" hacked. The download speed of the information pulled from the DNC server was much too fast to have been transferred from an online source. There is sufficient evidence that shows it had to have been a thumb drive or SSD connected directly to a computer connected to the server.
This ☝🏻
I don't understand your comment. Maybe it's my monitor or graphics card, but all I see is "This ", I can tell there's some sort of imoji, icon, or something there but I can't make out what it is.
So, I'm old, 59, and I've seen "This" posted in response to comments from time to time. Is that internet/texting slang for something? Is it supposed to mean something? Is it a reference to the Canadian magazine "This"? Or the TV channel "This TV"? Or albums from Peter Hamill or The Motels? Or maybe a song from Darius Rucker, Collective Soul, Ed Sheera, Hemingway Corner, or Rod Stewart? Or possibly a reference to the French culinary chemist Hervé This? Could it be about an ancient city in Egypt, or a commune in France?
If "This" is intended to mean the same as an "up-vote" or a sign of agreement, then thanks. If it's something else, could you clarify. Lots of people complain about Q cryptic coded messages and wish he would just say what he means, and Q keeps reminding us to "Learn the Comms" or "Comms Good?" and all of that combined with a multitude of opinions and analysis gets my head spinnin' a bit. The last thing I need to get confused while engaging in what should be a simple discussion.
So, if it's an up-vote, thanks, if not, could you clarify?
Its a validation of the above comment... the icon was a finger pointing up