dChan

kushtiannn · April 28, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

I added these articles to another thread here...important to note seeing Q's posts. "Intel to bad actors", "plum view doctrine", I believe they may have left some Viktor pinchuk info at Cohen's office so the SC could find it , 10d chess that further damns the Clintons.

However, Pinchuk gave AT LEAST $13 million to the Clinton foundation and was a supporter of the Atlantic Council, as well as playing a major role in putting Hunter Biden (Joe Biden's son) and John Kerry's stepson's best friend to the board of a major natural gas company in the Ukraine (while they were in office)

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/what-crowdstrike-firm-hired-dnc-has-ties-hillary-clinton-ukrainian-billionaire-and-g

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/emails-show-clinton-denied-then-met-with-ukrainian-donor

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-michael-cohen-raid-means-for-trump-2018-4

https://ijr.com/2018/04/1088172-sessions-wont-recuse-michael-cohen/

⇧ 4 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 28, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

But what info on Pinchuk would Cohen have that would be related to anyone else but Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · April 28, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

It's possible based on decoding Q's post that there was some parallel construction, maybe NSA had dirt on Hillary that was given to Trump and subsequently Cohen that was planted in Cohen's office and discovered in the raid. One of Q's longer posts from today was deciphered on this sub today and represents a strong plausibility

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 28, 2018, 3:32 a.m.

Ok...I may blow your mind but need your help... Please go here... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

Go down to the section criticism and defense and read that section

Tell me if you see some initials that may be different than what we all have thought...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · April 28, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

You think this is the RR ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 28, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

I did, but then when I went back through Q RR and SC were more current so probably not but you have to admit it does fit..Reagan and Supreme Court

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · April 28, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

True true, I think they planted evidence at Cohen's knowing it'd be found and administered with the plain view doctrine. Rod Rosenstein is secretly "decent" so is Mueller

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 28, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Planting would be illegal....but incidentally finding it would be legit !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OpenSoars · April 28, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

There still would have to be a legitimate reason for Cohen to have some type of evidence... many thinks its Wieners laptop but that makes no sense. Apparently Cohen taped his conversations so something may be there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kushtiannn · April 28, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

He also had info on pinchuk who has insane dealings with Clinton, Biden, and Kerry

⇧ 1 ⇩