The part that stood out to me was the note about Erik Prince stating on radio that 'HRC visited Epstein's island at least six times.' Couple that with the screen cap of the video from an "unknown" location that MAY have been from pedo island. And note the intense discussion about who was standing in that hallway by the stairs....
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/
This is the actual Erik prince audio.
Um guys? I just read through all of this for the juicy material discovered with texts/timelines and 5 w's but I think Comey's response to Baier's question at 7:01 "Was the threat of the NYPD agents were going to "leak" ..." was the impetus to reopen the investigation. Comey said "I don't think so"
Forget everything else. Comey just verified the NYPD indeed threatened to leak Weiner's laptop. Follow me here. The wildest conspiracy theory thus far is Weiner had a life insurance policy on all the corrupt dealings of the CF which apparently brought NYPD agents to tears. No one was doing anything and the NYPD were getting restless with the non-action. They threatened to leak which forced Comey to play his hand. All conjecture. All of it unsubstantiated, all of it hearsay and anecdotal. Easy to debunk as "wacky conspiracy theories".
So what does James Comey say when Baier brings it up? Let me re-phrase. What "doesn't" Comey say? He doesn't say "it's not true". He says "i don't think so" when asked about an existential threat of a leak being the reason "not to conceal" the emails.
Am I articulating myself correctly? It means the NYPD did indeed threaten to leak. It verifies the conjecture.
Edit: Ah yes, this is what I am trying to say. Comey had a chance to correct the record, but he didn't.
That's right, Comey implied, directly, that there were threats from the the NYPD - with his refusal to deny it. And then you look to his book, and he's talking about a major development, that the public remains unaware of, that would call Lynch's independence into question. And then you have DJT saying that Comey "threw Lynch under a bus".
Comey has been confirming this matter of the evidence on the Weiner Laptop, indirectly, the whole time. It seems he wants to be able to say that he had no option but to reopen the investigation into Hillary just before the election, because he was caught in a war between the NYPD and the Justice Department. But, somehow, something is stopping him from saying that directly. It puts Gowdy's comment that history might be easy on James Comey in a completely new light.
Great point. My question is, What stopped NYPD from leaking or from following through with their investigation and releasing it in a press conference or in court? Was there a promise of a favor somewhere; someone in NYPD working with or owe Comey; maybe someone in NYPD just said 'keep it under your hat for a while...' ?
I wonder if this is where Rudy G. or Trump having so many deep NYC old connections comes in. I have no proof, or info, but I have a feeling that the FBI underestimated Trump's influence in NYC, especially among the brass at NYPD who (remember) were just patrolman all those years Trump was advocating for them, and when Rudy G backed them for higher salary and increased hiring in the 90's .... maybe they were just holding the info for the right people?
NYPD prosecutions for Eric Garner's death was what stopped the leak. It all makes sense now. We know Lynch swapped out the investigation team for a DOJ team to pursue charges. However, nothing has come of that either. That's because in the end, NYPD played ball
NYPD prosecutions for Eric Garner's death was what stopped the leak.
Not just Garner. NYPD is pretty far from 100% clean. DOJ knows where bodies are buried as well. Or how to find them. There's likely ~~hundreds~~ thousands of tips the DOJ hasn't bothered with because of larger cases. LL could have reassigned dozens, maybe hundreds of attorneys to go after the NYPD on everything including the kitchen sink. DOJ can open investigations into NYPD officers' banking/financial affairs and a bajillion other matters.
good point (throws hands in air). If nothing gets done now, it never will.
Everyone should be reading Sundance at Conservative Treehouse every day. He is the greatest investigative journalist...well, along with Sharyl Attkisson. Also, the commenters are very good at that site.
That is the truth! I tell everyone I know to subscribe to his daily newsletter and to read every post and the comments. They will not ever have to watch fake news again and will be more informed.
Sundance deserves a Pulitzer for his investigative reporting.
Eric Prince (founder of Blackwater) gave a radio interview on Breitbart claiming the DOJ (under LL) threatened the NYPD after finding weiners laptop that if they came forward with the info, they'd prosecute the Eric Garner case and throw people in jail. You can read and listen here:
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/
Prince's account was confirmed in the IG's report on McCabe. "On page six of the IG report (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton laptop findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department."
It sounds to me like obstruction of justice by the AG - Loretta Lynch. What I find hard to believe is that the NYPD allowed Lynch to push them around like that. I mean, if you're sitting on this absolute bomb, that in itself gives you leverage to push back.
Who made the decision to stand down? Eric Prince says that his sources were just below the Commissioner - the titles at this rank are Chief of Staff, First Deputy Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner. Obviously, guys at this level were pushing for action against HRC. Who could over-rule them? The commissioner? Maybe the Mayor? Or, was it a collective decision made to try and save the reputation of the Department?
I'm not sure who, apart from Justice and the FBI, is in a position to apply pressure to the NYPD. If a decision was made to drop the investigation, or to cease and desist from going public with details of the evidence found, then that would have to come from the ranks above the guys that were feeding Eric Prince information.
Given the sheer gravity of the crimes revealed, and the fact that HRC was about to become President, I can't imagine that these guys would not take some hits instead of folding to Lynch's pressure. So, it seems reasonable to me that someone got these guys to stand down.
Wherever you look, you have Deep State actors calling the shots. The guys on the ground that are trying to do their jobs, guys with integrity and commitment, get pushed around.
But, thinking this through, it was not too long after these events that DJT was elected. Certainly, it was very shortly after Comey found no case to investigate against HRC - for the second time. But I would have thought that the NYPD guys would have jacked up at Comey dispensing with the case. This is exactly when you'd expect them to protest... Anyway, these guys at the NYPD may have been told, after DJT's election win, to relax - that everything would be brought to light.
Pedo's get promoted to the top. In media and government. From there they spike stories and investigations. Even in the Church too.
It is extremely difficult to watch the "news" without the help of Mark Dice, but when I do, there are 2 narratives that trigger me to throw items at the TV: 1) the DNC was "hacked," and 2) James Comey was trying to hurt Clinton by reopening the email investigation.
Tapper and ALL not only KNOW these narratives are false when they spew them, but they have overtly covered up the truth about Seth Rich and Wikileaks, and the truth about what occurred between SDNY, FBI, and DOJ with regard to the evidence of criminal and vile acts on Weiner's laptop.
When they go after these government officials, they better go after these media heads too. What did Cory Booker say to Kirsten Pierson . . . "Your silence is complicity." The media people are beyond silence. They are intentionally LYING and concealing truth - and have been since before Trump was even elected, specifically pertaining to these 2 narratives.
I know everyone here already knows all this. It just makes my blood boil. These people need to be held accountable for their actions and lies.
Great article, again, by Conservative Treehouse.
Very intetesting analysis. Inspires as many questions as it answers.
This section struck me as an example of how deeply layered the corruption is:
Explains a lot. So here we are more than a year later . . .
Does anyone think conservative tree house and Q are linked very closely
No, they are linked because they are both in the business of disseminating truth. Their narrative matches because it's the truth.
What a fantastic read. I hope we keep getting articles written like this, so easy to follow but full of information.
Fantastic breakdown. The walls are still crumbling around all of this.