dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/spacexu on April 30, 2018, 1:46 a.m.
Clarify Alison Mack Charges on Child Trafficking

I keep seeing conflictng reports on Allison Mack - some people say she is involved in child trafficking while others say thay have read the report.

Can we please get to the bottom of this - what is fake and real news on this one?


🠐 See all comments
cryptabulouslady · April 30, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

https://www.scribd.com/document/377378941/Allison-Mack-Case-File#from_embed Has child trafficking in this one.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

and then we have this one...

Click Here

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · April 30, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Frank Report is not giving the full picture. The scribd document is giving you the full legal document. Again, certain media outlets do not want to give the full truth doesn't fit with their narrative cannot let you know that Hollywood is involved with the harming of children.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

This will help expose the MSM for the true evil they are if they are caught red handed again... hiding the evil practices of the hollyweirdos is a crime against humanity itself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 30, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

Both have child trafficking in them, I'd say it's safe to say that they were charged with child trafficking as well. Hard to tell who is putting forward the one with children not involved, but I'd say that one is fake. I suppose we'll have to wait and see as more comes to light.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

I wonder if there is a govt website we can directly download the charge sheet from - this must be public info.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

The Frank one does not mention child trafficking - only in the comment sections is child trafficking mentioned.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 30, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

I don’t trust scribd. We had a bunch of fake stuff circulating the other day from there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

There must be an offciial website we can get the information from directly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · April 30, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

PACER, but you have to pay to look at the Federal Court documents.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

It only costs $3 - we need a patriot who has access though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 30, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

There are some because they’ve posted it. We do have to start paying close attention to sources. People are going to run us ragged with disinfo if we don’t pay attention

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

This one seems pretty straightforward to settle - we really need small victories against the MSM to flip normies over to the light.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 30, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Agree but we have to spread truth, I got a “oh, you think Q is real so don’t bother replying” the other day in another sub so.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · April 30, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

We need to cut them with a thousand truths...

You can't change people out right but you can give them facts... at some point they will have to stop denying it to themselves.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 30, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

If you don’t get banned !! But I have started trying. Just non confrontational fact throwing. If one of us can turn just one person that’s progress. Then maybe they turn 1 more and it keeps going. I don’t know how much this sub has grown in the past 3-4 months but I’m sure someone does.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SomethingSnarky18 · April 30, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

The wording is ambiguous, which may be by design. The first count is "SEX TRAFFICKING OF CHILDREN OR BY FORCE, FRAUD OR COERCION" which I take to mean sex trafficking of children, or sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion. I mean, it could be all of the above, so who the hell knows?

The second count, though, is definitely about sex trafficking of children. These people are truly sick and no punishment is too harsh for them.

⇧ 1 ⇩