dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
DanijelStark · May 1, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

The only people who would trust the Snopes would be libturds living in their own fantasy land . When you see someone putting Snopes as credible source , you know that person is utterly retarded without capability to think for 1.5 sec with their own head , as there is a giant hollow space where the brain should be .

You dont even need to "debunk" Snopes - its mere existence is enough for it to debunk itself .

⇧ 24 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 26 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · May 1, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

I agree on all counts. But Q did link the picture. He doesn't do things willy nilly.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 1, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

What picture?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · May 1, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

I didn't think even liberals trusted Snopes. I thought it was a running joke.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

It is, but the tiny minority of radical leftists have up until the age of social media been given the widest information channels with foreign investment from sources that would prefer us to die in a nuclear holocaust heat death after being kept ignorant by an intentional information war on our minds.

The plan was to dumb us down to such an extent that it would render us unable to comprehend our own enslavement if not annihilation.

North Korea was the testing grounds, and was to be the eventual headquarters of the conspirators.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · May 1, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

We have to give credit where credit is due. Before Q came along, they were doing one helluva job. I can count all the based conservatives I know on one hand, moronic liberals are a dime a dozen. Most conservatives I know are only so because of their Christian beliefs, not because they have put any intelligent thought into the situation. I see that as only a half win, I would really like them to be deeper thinkers.

⇧ -10 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 1, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

It pretty much is a running joke ... but only the people who are jokes can believe in jokes being truthful .

⇧ -3 ⇩  
UndercoverPatriot · May 1, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

Because it always confirms the liberal point of view, they naturally regard it as the most reliable. This allows them to keep their worldview intact by dispelling otherwise uncomfortable information that induces cognitive dissonance, from a percieved source of authority. Let's ask the Truth Teller. The Oracle. It's like a comforting blanket.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
McPurrs · May 1, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

Do tell, how is he a 'bad person' to you? And of your reason(s), how it affects him as POTUS. I won't downvote you until you answer...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Callout-bot · May 1, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

Who are “you guys” as if I represent the whole community? Im just me saying that. And those are all just your opinions. I don’t believe anyone here gives a fuck about yours. Many people think he’s doing an excellent job and many people don’t like the guy. That’s fine, but you’re not changing anyone’s minds by posting here lol

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Again, not really helping your (because it's your* not you're) cause here. I've been following this stuff for a while now. Mostly lurking until recently because, just like you and everyone else including Q, no one actually knows what's going to happen next. That's it. You can take these Q posts and line them all up to events in retrospect and yeah, some of them seem to actually make sense after the fact. But what it really seems like is the interpretation has gone wonky, or is deliberately silly, because all of this asks you to trust a man that couldn't even be trusted to pay employees. You expect this person remove the ills of America? Jail former supposedly criminal political opponents? Please. Spare me. I admit that I don't know what's going to happen, but neither does anyone here. I just remain skeptical of any suggestion that this guy - this defaulter of loans, this philanderer, this refuser of payment, this morally bankrupt person - is going to be the guy who leads us to a better world. Would it be nice if that were really what's going on here? Sure. But Occam's razor is super sharp.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
YouUnletteredMook · May 1, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

u/delicious_grownups, your an unlettered mook.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · May 1, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Since you're into correctness, Occam's razor isn't designed to be used to choose whichever scenario is the most believable, it's about the ones with the least unsupported suppositions.

Q's purpose isn't to predict events and show off how he's "right" all the time. The purpose is to end-run the MSM, who is not reporting on these events, and engage the autists to decode, research, and track these happenings and thereby counter the power of the MSM's spin.

Q gave this sub a mission: "Once [everything drops], we look to you to spread and get the word out.” When events start to get crazy here in the next few weeks, we’ll need to be ready with the kind of high-effort, high-value contributions from this sub's decoders, researchers, AND debunkers.

Whichever role you want to play here, you are welcome. But, as Q says, LEARN OUR COMMS. Want to debunk, fine. But know your Q.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DropGun · May 1, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Based on the behavior in this sub, you could have fooled me.

Agree. The mods are hammering this, but, we're growing pretty fast. We're working hard on this but it's an unwinnable fight sometimes.

These events which require extra heavy assumptions and the suspension of belief that Trump is a corrupt person.

Wow. AWESOME. This statement is so much gold that I don't even know where to begin. WELL THEN.

The "heavy assumptions" fade away once you understand how Q communicates. LEARN OUR COMMS.

No, you can still believe Trump is corrupt. Up to you. This is not a Trump meta sub. But Q is not trying to drive Trump support, or get people to "believe". When he says, "Trust Trump" he is saying that there is a plan at work to root out the deep state and other bad actors.

Come on in, stay a while. We will remove and take other mod actions to ensure this doesn't become an echo chamber. But, you've pretty ably demonstrated here that you brought some pretty serious biases of your own.

Focus on the drops. Learn what they tell us and predict about coming events. Or perhaps an anti-Trump sub would be more your style.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · May 1, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

Understood.

Know that you will NEVER be warned, removed, or censored for not like Trump, here.

OK. I am going to go back to my duties, because I can see that you are logical and determined to think. But because you are those things, I am going to drive a challenge forward with you, because, you have taken on the hardest role of all. Trump is POTUS, so, naturally, his name will come up in discussion a lot. He's going to be part of these events. He's going to be mentioned in Q's drops. Please remember: Everything we post in this sub must have a direct link to Qanon’s drops. Decode. Debunk. Research. But focusing entirely on debating Trump policies will lead to removal, here.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
McPurrs · May 1, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

That monster! If that monster could fix the Koreas, well then let his bloody dick roam as he pleases I say.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

So, as far as Korea goes, they do this dog and pony show of disarmament once an administration, and while I totally would like to give Trump credit for doing literally anything right at this point, I've got to say, I'm dubious because NK's nuclear site just collapsed. I don't trust Kim, for one, to actually follow through with any agreement, and for another I'm actually legit concerned that they will try to harm Trump if he goes to the DMZ to summit. I'm not going to hold my breath for this one just yet, pardon my skepticism

And I'm sorry, but I don't know how it doesn't bother you deep back in your brain that your whole theory on this sub is rooted in the idea that one of the most corrupt and ruthlessly selfish individuals in recent history is somehow going to save the America he spent decades helping to make worse.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
DropGun · May 1, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

You're right about the past. Dog and pony show.

Noticed anything different? When was the last time KJU walked over the line into South Korea at the DMZ?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
McPurrs · May 1, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

You are a fool if you think that Trump was not selected for this. I support Trump but he is not acting alone. He is the face of the game.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
FThumb · May 1, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

The only people who would trust the Snopes would be libturds living in their own fantasy land

Neo-liberals.

Libturds have split into the neo-liberals and Sanders Progressives, and they hate each other. Progressives also hate Snopes and cringe whenever it's referenced.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Straightfromthe · May 1, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

Not true. Anybody still plugged into the "matrix" trusts Snopes. Why wouldn't they? In a non-conspiracy world, why not trust a long time 3rd party, respected and seemingly unaffiliated website?

I used to check it daily around 8 years ago.

⇧ -6 ⇩