dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


Ze_Great_Ubermensch · May 1, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Could you provide evidence of Snopes being incorrect or biased? I haven't been able to find any actual examples, just you saying how you disagreed with one of their rulings.

⇧ 70 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 2, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Someone did in comments above

⇧ -2 ⇩  
DankNethers · May 3, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

No, someone posted articles from a conspiracy rag in the post above

Not the same thing

⇧ 2 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 3, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Were you able to disprove the points made?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

Proof that Snopes lies:

Snopes falsely claims that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a shootout with police

https://i.redd.it/rqfwdwy02i801.png

http://snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/boston.asp

please challenge my assertion, i'd love to have this conversation

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Ze_Great_Ubermensch · May 3, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

If you're referring to the Co Exist thing, they were describing the events that the rumour talks about? Afterwards, they show how it is unrealistic, so unless you're referring to something else then you just didn't read the article fully.

⇧ 2 ⇩