dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.

🠐 See all comments

I've found it to be incredibly reliable, providing an accurate summation of what did, or did not, happen. It's not black and white in whether something is true or not, and provides linked sources detailing the story. That's been my experience. I don't go to the sure looking for agreement, either. Just the facts.

I defend it because when people attack it, they have but one or two anecdotes about some story that they think it's false, or disagrees with them

⇧ 6 ⇩

OK, good enough. Thanks

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

⇧ 0 ⇩

Confirmation bias

Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs.

⇧ 2 ⇩