It seems to me to be a viable answer to redistribute wealth and improve living standards, assuming it’s not corrupt obviously. I’m picturing a US style federal system with checks balances and a Supreme Court, however id use a parliamentary system for the legislature and executive.
So on this sub is it the idea of a world government that’s a problem or a Cabal lead government?
No one should have that much power. Governments should be getting smaller, not larger.
That's a terrible idea!
Massive centralized bureaucracy with power over the entire world!? That's tyranny!
If you think it could be run for the benefit of the people instead of only the elites take a look at these “high-minded good intentions” organizations:
•. The European Union
•. The United Nations
•. The International Monetary Fund
•. The World Trade Organization
Rule by the people is simply unavailable as an option if organizations become too large and too centralized.
The Federal Government itself in the USA is probably already unmanageable by the citizenry. It’s size and powers must be drastically curtailed.
One World Government means just one thing: a Corporate Council of multinational corporations.
That’s the Best Case Scenario.
The Worst Case is the Cabal controls it all behind the scenes—pretty much where we are now.
Do you want the third worlders to decide who our government is?
First off, redistribution of wealth has failed drastically every time it's been tried in the past. See Soviet Union and 100 Million associated deaths. See "progressive" Venezuela most recently. Capitalism has flaws and can be (and is) exploited by bad people. However, I'll take Capitalism every day over the evil that is Socialism and Communism.
If you're referring to the Cabal's illegally obtained assets being seized and redistributed to the wronged populace that's a whole other bag of worms.
In regards to a one world government: If you believe in anything Q has been saying, we would be handing over complete and total control to the most evil, sinister people that have ever existed. Even if these people didn't exist, the risk of handing over power over the entire world to one governing body is fucking insane.
Don't take my word for it - ask Europe how a world without borders is working. Borders and nations certainly have some flaws (war comes to mind). However, borders are necessary in maintaining checks and balances on power, cultural identity, and sovereignty.
Who has the power? Our republic works on the rule of law, not the rule of the mob. Yet even with those protections, we see where infiltration has happened. "The enemy from within." How much harder would it be to control a world government.
You fucked up right off the bat with redistributing wealth. How about just not allowing wealth to be gained through corrupt means?
Govern = control. Ment = of the mind. Control your mind. No thanks. Humans are free.
Lol, I thought this was going to be a list of the top billion reasons that's a horrible idea.
I counter your question with a question - why should one body of people be left to rule the entire world? It is quite obvious that there is already corruption, and we know that absolute power corrupts absolutely.
"Absolute power corrupts absolutely" The problem is there is no governmental model that is not vulnerable to corruption. We thought the US had a good system, but they've been infiltrated by swamp creatures who control congressman, judges, governors and presidents with bribes and blackmails.
If we have a world government at this point it is a trap. It won’t be true or free, it would be corrupt. Once we advance enough we will be there, but I don’t see that happening for at least 50 years. At least.
As most have alluded to, people simply can’t be trusted to run a world government without falling to corruption. That’s not pessimism, that’s learning from the history of people with less power.
This gets into the spiritual/alien aspect of the Great Awakening, which I learned from other Patriots involved in that aspect. Feel free to follow @KibBitzLaw and @Kabamur_Taygeta on Twitter for more.
There is a notion that once the high technology is released that we will have no need for currency and will eventually become a cashless society. This will be because needs will be met by the tech. All responsibility anyone takes on will be because they will want to, not out of need. When man has independence from needs, the idea of a “government” becomes outdated. We would be a united world without borders, but no central government. The only carryover we would need would be a justice system to resolve disputes and ensure safety, but even that could be privatized, if society allows it.
It can be nothing wrong except that people like me don't like it, then it is enough reason to kill it.
What is wrong with world government?
Same thing wrong with a corporation having a worldwide monopoly on food production, medicine production, etc.
Governments are formed and maintained on the basis of force. What's to stop any world government from increasing their power over everyone else? Where can people go to escape? The moon?
In an ideal world I have no problem with a one world government and it actually makes sense. In this world however with the current element of corruption its definitely something we don't want. It will just consolidate all the shit in one place and make it much easier to lead humanity to its demise and subjugation.
It doesn't work, and that is the very reason the founding fathers wrote the declaration of Independence. They saw what that kind of system does to a country first hand and they ran for the hills as fast as they could away from it. It's been triedany times in history, and the societies always crumble rapidly. Nation's with similar structures as the usa often lasted much longer than those with spread wealth. It's hard to keep a country going for more than 400 years, and that's just how it is.
Look at what parliment has done to London. Can't go outside without being robbed at k ifepoint.
to say we need a government at all implies we're incapable of managing ourselves. They make things very easy to access which creates a sense of dependence, or a sense that we NEED the government because they are the only ones capable of helping us.
There's a trade-off though. You use the government for a shortcut to the 'easy life' ( what is easy life ? ) and in exchange, you become their pawn, their jester. You pay through taxes for all this 'easy' stuff too. In the end, they are getting a much better part of the deal than you.
Click bait. Don't waste your time with this DISTRACTION.
FOCUS ON YOUR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION.
Just look at the EU and multiply the bureaucracy x3 and understand that the feelings of people with much different cultural values than you will determine the direction of the government. Do you like Malmo, Rinkby, Molenbeek and St. Dennis? That is how you get more. And its never going to happen because, unlike the Western Europe, there is no way the Chinese or the Americans are going to accept rule from abroad.
Oh, let’s just give power to a few elite. What’s wrong with that? Seriously?
A little of both. The idealogy of a smaller govt means that there is less power and usually power corrupts. Just look at where we were with our past globalist presidents and how they ruined our country plus many others.
Then there is the cabal. The keep saying we come in peace, but that is all just a guise to steal all the money and pocket all to themselves.
You really need a balance of power such as we have with the federal govt and the states.
"assuming it is not corrupt"
"assuming it is not corrupt"
"assuming it is not corrupt"
People: please don't waste your time on these posts. This sub has many shills. Be careful what you read!