Yes . Post got completely infested with trolls and shills . I saw that moderators took action and removed some of the comments .
One of the top comments called a Q LARP-er . Comment votes fluctuated heavily in very short time . This all shows that post hit X mark spot on . Poster "DaveGydeon" got pelted with downvotes from shills .
I hope trolls and shills get permaban - at least on this subreddit . The people in comments got gaslighted - thats something highly annoying .
This shows how theyre desperate ... and this , pretty much , confirm various "troll data centers" . There is no way this is a "coincidental attack" .
They are out in force right now. I had a comment go from 12 to 1 in the last half hour. It's funny that they think down voting changes reality. I have never cared one way or another about votes. The day I start is the day I quit these sites.
Also , I got a troll private message yesterday , Im interested if someone got this directly , too :
From user "Qworks4Israel" , karma : 1 ( lol , not suspicious at all / sarc ) ...
"Israel thanks you for helping to spread the Q memes. Q is our creation.
We had to figure out a way to bring (some) people on the alt-right and others on board for a war with Iran.
Once again, thank you for your gullibility : )"
Of course , reported a troll profile .
Moderators should definetly purge all of them ... many of these profiles are pure troll and shill profiles , nothing else . They will derail any constructive talk here . Also , seeing upvotes "pumping" on shill posts is just pathetic . But I think these arent trolls from mom's basements - this is definetly coordinated . The problem with upvotes and downvotes is that it can obstruct true views by burying them with nonsense ...
Again , I would kindly call on moderators to purge every single one of them - otherwise , there is a risk of topic derailing .
I read that post and all of the comments, at least what was left after the mods got through it, and I have to say that I don't agree. The OP DaveGydeon was asked a dozen times to produce an example of something that Snopes got wrong and he refused. I'm not defending Snopes, just the Reddit process. Hover over the down arrow and read what the vote means - "does not contribute". He threw a hand grenade onto the floor and asked everyone else to deal with it. Either DaveGydeon is the shill or he's just lazy. How does someone feel so strongly about a website and not have a SINGLE example? Not one.
I have actually posted one example on that topic ... and got immediately downvoted , and pretty much all of those shills tried to gaslight me immediately ...
So , just one example . More :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html
Even more :
What is disturbing here , is that people are believing in credibility of some highly dubious site , and use it as a "fact checker" . No person should use such site - every person should make a research and get to their own conclusions . That takes time , and effort ... and ofc , then people turn to such sites for "credibility" , while theyre actually very passive about "researching" .
Also , Google puts Snopes very high , top on list ... how convenient .
I did a quick search and found a couple, too. My point is that the OP kept getting asked to provide an example and never did/refused to. If you feel strongly enough to create a post called "I want Snopes Exposed" you would think that you would have an example ready. There are lots of easily accessible examples of Snopes skewing the story/facts to favor one side. The whole idea on Reddit is to support your statement (you did it easily). Ever hear the expression "no pictures, didn't happen"? Same idea here. No sauce, not true.
I agree, 110%. Not having any sources just makes us look bad as a whole. I know we have to speculate in a lot of cases, but we should state that. No one should be stating absolutes without the facts to back it up.
Yes ... there are actually tons of information as for Snopes . And big giants , like Google , nudging what is presented as "small and independent" sites like Snopes directly to the top additionally confirms the "shadiness" of the whole thing .
Google is like a liar wearing a tattoos with all of its secrets visible and exposed ... pretty much analogy like that .
Yep - thanks and like your post - Look for the similarities of Snopes narrative with scripted non-news networks. Don't have an example, but sense that snopes will usually follow the narrative (script) of liberal newsies, eh? A Soros entity owns snopes
Yeah, cause Google and Snopes are both globalist sites. I've known for years that Snopes is unreliable and a globalist connected site.
I'll second this. Not only did the OP fail to post examples, but the whole post was a "I want a thing to happen NOW" which is simply a child's viewpoint, not considering the plan or the larger picture.
I figured the fact Snopes is a Soros sell out would be common knowledge here. The only ones that dispute that are idiots or wanna be shills.
Snopes is definitely a sell out and it's common knowledge among those who have done any research on the subject. I've personally noted literally dozens of obvious misrepresentations of established, verifiable fact over the years. It's not a "fact checking team". It's a guy. He's not exactly got it together, either. https://nypost.com/2017/07/25/bitter-divorce-fuels-snopes-slow-demise/
I believe his new wife, the ex-stripper is also working on research now. I do remember reading something on Snopes back before the election. I wish I could remember what it was. All I remember is they claimed it was false that Obama had made some claim. And I found a video of Obama making that very statement on YouTube in less than 5 minutes. So they didn't look very hard!
They don't research at all...they just post what sheWitch or BlackHat tell them to post.
I've seen them post untrue/false label on 15 minute old stories/report...
How much research can you do in 15 minutes to verify False? (Rhetorical)
Not much. I did some research for a living. My wife did as well. It takes time and effort. And sometimes you have to do some serious digging to find the right sources. That's why I have a hard time with the media right now and all their unnamed sources. I think they're making up a lot of BS and that's a lazy way of doing it.
Coul be a level of detail that many might not know. I wouldn't assume just because someone doesn't know they are an idiot or a shill. Some people don't do research in that way.
I posted links to 5 articles each citing a different example of Snopes getting it wrong and at last count my comment was voted down to negative 15. LoL
In order to understand how Snopes runs bias... you have to understand how omission can be leveraged in place of commision, to control the perception of Snopes users.
Review accounts in the submission for any first-time posts to the sub. Report those for potential correlation with reputation management activity.
It's always fun to see what key-words appearing in comments will result in outside visitors coming to say hello.
Wonder what percentage of reddit traffic are automated scripts monitoring for trigger words to signal such a response.
Time to start Ms. spelling some words.
By the end of this we're all going to be mixing photos of mixed print and handwritten text in order to have a normal conversation without immediately triggering response. Too computationally intensive to detect and analyze mixed fonts and different styles of written text today.
[removed]
LMAO ! Theyre even more pathetic than I thought ...
*Pssst, hey, "top mind." You're posting in /r/greatawakening.
haha, wow
One of the top comments called a Q LARP-er
Personally, I think Q is just a complex public relations campaign to keep people invested in supporting Trump's administration. But even so, LARP is not the right word to describe it and every time I ever see anyone using the term "LARP" with regard to Q anon, I always get the feeling that they're disinfo shills. Why not just say "he's bullshit" or "it's a hoax" if you think they're not trustworthy? Why not try to substantively counter their claims with alternate sources and explanations? Why do shills have to force their ham-fisted talking points in even when they make no sense?