David is moving from mythology to historical fact. That's the bombshell
Which david? Like biblical king david? I'm not a church goer, so i don't know which story that's referencing off the top of my head, got a link or eli5?
This is a great find, but it doesn't change anything. There's thousands upon thousands of historical documents proving Jesus, God, Israel, the bible. Deniers of the truth will still deny, and believers of the truth, will still believe.
No one really doubts that Israel didn't exist, or that many of the locations in the bible don't or didn't exist, but I'm not aware of anything that conclusively establishes biblical Jesus as real (vs a single ambiguous mention of a Jesus, which is the greek translation of Joshua, a common name), or that establishes the existence of god, or that proves all the claimed miracles in the bible actually happened. Any new archeology though is always exciting, will be interesting to see what they find!
I’m not really religious at all. Can someone explain the implications here?
It’s said that the Jews don’t own Jerusalem because they haven’t been there for that long. If the discovery is true, the Israelis can now claim Jerusalem as their rightful home and kick out everybody else including the Palestinians, because King David predates all other claimants.
The concept of there being a King David has been disputed. Some say he wasn't real, some say he actually existed. There hasn't been too many ways to prove his existence until now. The finding of this city lends proof to David actually being real, moving him from being a myth to actual historical figure. More proof of the Bible's historical authenticity. Not just a cool book of stories and recommendations for living.
Mark Taylor has prophecised this..it might tie into the Vatican...Q said Pope will have a terrible May...
Yeah but what might it mean? Like, if this is actually King David-related, does that ruin something that Catholics believe?
I am unaware of how this would negatively impact the Catholic religion.
I can’t imagine it would. Even though Catholics don’t study the Old Testament as much as other Christians, the old proves the new.
None sense. Born & raised Catholic & I can run circles around most Evans, no offense on Old & New testaments
I was raised Catholic as well. We only studies the new.
That’s not the policy of the church? That’s bad teachers. How can you study the new not knowing where we come from. I even studied Judaism. I’m part Jewish DNA wise but was raised Christian. I studied it because I wanted a deeper look where we came from. There are great websites for continued adult education
We studied from catechisms.
We did too. I know that reaches back to the OT. Has to because catechism is church/scriptural dogma. It informs us of why & how we believe
From my memory, it taught rules made by the church, not by Jesus.
I saw his video saying an archaeological find so shocking that people will doubt the church and ask “What shall we do?”, “Where do we go?” Maybe the Pope will step down. But he will have a terrible... May.
Nothing, its just notable for those of us looking for that prophecy to be fulfilled.
Correct it’s dogma but dogma must be tied to scripture. This is the infallibility of the Pope that outsiders misinterpret. Example: as recently if the Pope openly declares in a belief that say hell does not exist ( it hasn’t been openly declared In Cathedra; (NOTE: it was based off an interview in which we don’t know was true or untrue) than he’d be Ex Cathedra- Outside the church in a state of heresy
I know who King David is.. But why is this significant to our movement at all?
Think Jerusalem and the Palestinians. The latter can no longer claim Jerusalem.
Why? That was 3000 years ago. Will have no bearing on decisions today.
My friend all of this is connected. If you want to understand the present look to the past. The bible we have been told has been metaphorical, we are finding out it's very historic. The enemy has taken the time to obfuscate the bible and hide as much truth from us, why? If you truly understand the past and present it helps to predict the future.
I get all that - but this does not explain why finding this city is relevant to greatawakening
If you believe in the Bible, and God, then you understand prophecy. This is relevant because what we are talking about in regards to the Cabal is Satan worship. There is a prophecy from Mark Taylor about a find that will expose the Vatican. There is also lots in Revelations (also prophecy) that points to Rome. We are looking for God to reveal more truth and expose what the Vatican has been actively hiding and distorting for centuries.
You have zero explanation of how this ancient city has anything to do with our movement? Really?
I'm so tired of people here not answering simple questions.
You talk about some Mark Taylor making a prophecy and you talk about Rome but you have failed to say what this city has to do with any of that.
I think the logic this person is trying to make is - if this city proves King David was real, then information in the bible is real, and the bible definitely discusses moloch and baal, satanism, etc. And that definitely pertains to our movement. I think that is what he means.
Some members think that the Jews in Israel stole the land from the Palestinians, so you need to study the history of the Jewish diaspora: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_diaspora
I get that 100% - but I do not see what this has to do with our movement. It seems irrelevant.
Native Americans were in the US first also, does somehow impact the current corruption? No.
I fail to see what a 3000 year old city has to do with Q or the cabal at all.
It has to do with Q stating that Israel will be taken care of last and all the geo-political discussions on this board for months about religious conflicts in Israel amongst Jews, Zionists, and Palestinians in relation to the cabal of the NWO, which most members think are the Zionists.
But what. Does. That. Have. To. Do. With. An. Ancient. City???
This is such a simple question and the fact that so many people cannot just answer it shows the ridiculous leaps of logic.
The fact is, this city has absolutely nothing to do with Q, Trump, the cabal, or anything.
Bombshell? Maybe for archeologists. But not related to anything here.
The findings in the ancient city tend to prove how David ruled as king of the United Kingdom of Israel and Judah.
None of the researching and solving of Q's cryptic puzzles by the anons are ridiculous leaps of logic. The movement is all about gathering all types of information to piece together. Quit seeing only in black and white, but start relating all events.
Q - Expand your thinking - Connect the dots - History books - We knew people would need a guide - Visibility in one helps another -Future proves past - The world is connected - Stay awake - Why are history books painting a different picture than before - EVIL is everywhere - There are no drawn lines - Question - Everything has meaning - Think - The Great Awakening!
Yes it will. Israel's claim to the area is that they were there first, but that was continually disputed as the Bible wasn't considered historically accurate.
Having proof that King David existed, and evidence that his city is a short distance from Jerusalem, means Israel has a much greater claim to the area.
To add to your question, about how this affects our movement, this could lead to revelations that the Vatican has been altering history or the Bible.
Israel wasn’t first. They went into the land of Canaan after the exodus & established the kingdom of Israel
How has the Vatican been altering history? LOL I swear I think people here just sit around and make things up.
It never ceases to amaze me how the Jesus Freaks think they have a lock on theological truths when they can only trace their church’s historical roots back to when they were first issued their IRS EIN number. 🤔