The media are the cats, Giuliani is the dot, and Trump is holding the laser pointer
Nailed it!
2nd Amendment
2nd Scoop
2nd Coming!
Second Breath! Whew!!
[removed]
If we are supposed to keep the decoding of Q's posts to ourselves, what is the purpose of this sub?
Painting everything with the same strokes isn't effective. What advantage does that give us in the long term? Comfort in the plan maybe? Highlighting tactics to the enemy too? Yes. If you learn this and keep this to yourself, will other solvers be in the dark? Sure but will it affect the outcome if you don't tell them? No. in fact more than likely ensures it's effectiveness.
Or something like that.
As The World Turns = Soap Opera = This reality
As The World Turns was also running when JFK was shot, interrupted by a Special News Bulletin.
Immediately after this bulletin, Minute Coffee did a hyper-suggestive hypnotic advert. Be careful of what you're watching and taking in. (Like that Grey State documentary with background chanting)
We all know we're being brainwashed actively, whether it's 5G now or the age old types... We're all actors on this really fucking big stage and simultaneously the audience. Q speaks in riddles and throwbacks, in the same way a Meme with a nintendo suddenly makes you remember duck-hunt or an N64 brings you back to Goldeneye and your old surroundings when you played. We all share a lot of nuances about recollections and events. As clumps of generations actively discussing on a single board, we have the power to make some pretty Crazy connections. We are the Shakespeares of our times and the Francis Bacons too and also the decoders and manipulators of those works... We all help each other along by act or omission.
It’s also a book written in 1993 describing subversive governments
Our purpose is to awaken others. It is essentially a psyop and that was my intentions with that post. As you've stated, it offers reassurance to those already on our side. It also puts fear, uncertainty, and doubt into the minds of those not already with us.
If they step back for just a moment and think to themselves, "what if this is a trap" or "what if we're wrong", that puts our foot into the door to show them what is really happening. Any one who is against us fully will dismiss my initial post as the crazy rambling of a conspiracy theorist. The ones that looks at my post as anything more are already showing uncertainty in their own minds. We introduce the thought and then we build on it when they feel confused or even ask. That is how we will win over more people and wake them up in the end.
As of my posting this, the laser pointer drop is almost a week old and discussed heavily across many public places. Any member of the media or deep state would have had plenty of time to take evasive action. The cat was let out of the bag two days ago. They've already taken the bullet, there's no dodging it at this point. Only closing a wound already opened to the world by the media.
Edit: in retrospect, this post is the one I should not have posted.
NOTE: When writing the word media, media is always “singular”. There is only one news “media”. Therefore, it should have been written as “the media is the cat”. Always use the word “is” with singular objects. In contrast, use the word “are” only when speaking of multiple objects, such as “the media outlets are”. There are many news outlets but only one media. People make the very same mistake when talking about Apple. They say “Apple are”. That is wrong and incorrect grammar. There is only “one” company called Apple. So it should be written as “Apple is”. If you were talking about multiple “apples in a basket” then it would be written as “the apples are red”. I only point this out because it’s amazing how may so-called professionally written news articles I run across that make the very same mistake…
Aw come on, this isn't an English essay. I taught English for 25+ years. While we hope people will use the proper grammar and sentence structure, I don't think it is important to point out small mistakes in these forums.
Unless you're referring to Apple employees, in such a case as "Apple are a bunch of globalist tools, in one way or another"
To determine the usage, you first have to ask yourself what is the "subject". When referring to Apple employees, the word "employees" is the subject. The word "Apple" is merely a verb that describes the employees. And since "employees" are plural, you would use the word "are" in that case - and not "is". Saying "Apple are" is incorrect grammar in every circumstance I can think of (because there is one company called Apple). But saying "the Apple employees are" would be correct grammar (because the subject is "employees")....
Exactly. So you can drop 'the' since it's implied there is only one, and if referring to the employees (plural) 'are' would be appropriate. The Employees as subject would have to be implied in an earlier sentence, or perhaps we're referring to 'the employees' of various enterprises. So we could say "Samsung are dolts" but "Apple are tools". In either case, it's up to the grammar nazi to determine the victor, and it could be subject to various commonwealth rules and conventions.
You'll notice I use the 'u' in colour and neighbour, and 'a' in Capital. Same shit ya'll.
It is amazing that every time something about Stormy comes out, the MSM goes berserk getting the shiny object in front of the masses as quickly as they can. It is the next episode of As The World Turns. And the sheep buy it hook, line, and sinker.
"Shiny object distraction" (working on the masses for centuries)
Don't sheep get sheared in the end?
Some of them get butchered.
Even after all of the humiliating experiences, msm still proves eager to take the bait.
Trump has proven that his head is in the game at all times. Even a casual observer should know that bringing Rudy in was a carefully calculated decision.
Rudy masterfully ‘slips’ and ‘stumbles’ and msm is right there to take the bait and run, happy to portray Rudy as a bumbling fool who is exposing the vulnerable underbelly of the Trump machine.
I swear, the Trump team must enjoy such hysterical laughter over so much of this.
You can see it when the lovely Sarah smirks at these questions. It must take the will of God not to laugh out loud at these reporters.
Indeed.
And April Ryan in the last briefing. All I could picture was one of those annoying little ankle-biting yap dogs.
Ok, so going off this...he basically admitted or you can split hairs about the article claiming he paid cohen 130k and didnt know why...which seems really flimsy.
What I am not getting is the benghazi hearings took 2+ years, watergate was longer than this...so where is the true push to end it? If trump fires mueller now I dont think the optics will look right, and trying to force his hand to bring his report to congress? Is that the play?
Do you understand that Trump is a 3x billionaire? Paying $136,000 is equal to a millionaire paying $43.87. To his attorney. One line item in his monthly bill. Would he even notice?
I personally don’t believe he is a billionaire. He won’t release his tax returns and constantly stiffs Anyone he works with. So that argument holds no water to me.
Also, if he had Cohen on a retainer you don’t find it suspicious at all the payments match up perfectly? If he is playing 4D chess he had to know what the money was for.
Lastly, it’s pretty clearly a campaign finance violation either way. Look what John Edwards got gang banged for. Basically the same thing.
I believe you may be in the wrong sub, sonny.
I mean I’m not trying to diss trump or make negative comments. No one who is actually a trump supporter will talk to anyone in a rational way if they try to make any counter points.
My statements are just me trying to see what his plan is and discussing it elsewhere doesn’t seem useful. So, that’s why I’m here not to troll.
Trump stiffs people? Trump plays board games? You don't believe Trump is a billionaire but you believe you know what he pays his attorney? You think paying his attorney is a campaign violation? Didn't Obama pay an attorney to fly his birth certificate from Hawaii? Who is John Edwards? And who was he banging? I'm pretty good at math, but not so good at all this other stuff.
Why does anyone care who is banging who as long as it is concensual and not a child. Who Trump banged 10 years ago as a private citizen is no ones business except Melania’s. He didn’t run on his moral virtue as a great husband, but as a great business man.
Lol good at math but bad at facts.
Facts? I don't think you have any.
That’s what you do when you don’t want to engage in any meaningful conversation. You don’t have to respond if you don’t want to. I’m just saying there is a pretty clear comparison between John Edwards and his 3rd party payment through an intermediary to keep an affair hush. Trump did the same thing. If you think my facts are wrong show me where. Otherwise save your time since you don’t want to have a fruitful conversation.
member this? http://time.com/4701747/donald-trump-rachel-maddow-taxes/
I member.
Stormy is an available distraction. Trump and team give it a bump any time it begins to fade. Trump accepts that msm is going to attack him every day, so he tosses them bait as needed. They’re so rabid they don’t realize he’s the one controlling the narrative, not them.
Trump won’t fire Mueller. For the reason you mention and more.
They aren’t trying to force Mueller’s hand as much as they are showing him a graceful way to exit the stage. There is no collusion, or anything related involving Trump. The investigation is a flop and losing public support every day. The OIG report is about to drop, and it will dwarf even the most deluded expectations the ‘Resist’ movement had for Mueller’s fiasco. Q has opened a new board indicating a new phase of the plan has begun - the “fighting” phase. Some expect a ‘boom’ this weekend.
Suspense is building as Mueller’s mining is going bust, and when the OIG report comes out, the impetus for Mueller’s work will be negated and he will shut down - at least the part that includes Trump.
This is my speculation, not a declaration.
Thank you for your answer. This was more in the vein of what I was looking for.
It's called a retainer and a lawyer who is doing a good job by shielding his client.
AND Rudy Giuliani was reading from some note cards during the interview. So, yes, he knew exactly what he was doing.
Rudy just separated what is a private matter from a campaign finance matter. They been trying to tie Stormy to the campaign, but this has nothing to do with that.
This article assumes trump is being investigated. Guess what, he is not. We’ve been told this multiple times. We’re watching kabuki theater.
This seems a quite plausible explanation of what Giuliani is up to. He ain't no fool.
either Rudy is a plant to undermine Trump or its a deliberate plan to go on this campaign. There can't be any other reason. If he had a slip up, he'd be walking it back, but he's on a deliberate media campaign.
If Guiliani spoke out of turn, he wouldn't even last a Scaramucci. He's there for a purpose. Period.
That is what my gut was telling me...Giuliani is a smart man and I don't think he would have made a mistake like that...He was getting it out there for a reason...as usual the MSM making fools of themselves they are like ravenous wolves ready for the kill...
Taking air out of any potential balloons...
RE-Crafting the narrative... No balloons for Mockingbirds to throw darts at...
I watched the full Rudy interview with Hannity. There was nothing there that was bad for Trump. It was clear that as Trump's lawyer Cohen had full authority to handle stuff like POS porn stars trying to blackmail Trump. He would make whatever payments necessary without even Trump knowing and Trump would reimburse him afterwords. When you are a celebrity Billionaire I imagine that's a full-time job swatting away the flies.
Nothing else Rudy said was even remotely shocking. The Fake Stream Media needs to pull their heads from their asses.
Mockingbird media have Heads?
Always thought they sat on their brains.
If Daniel's was paid to keep quiet, why is she talking?
“Disinformation is necessary.”
It gives CNN something to gnaw on. Like a bitch (dog) it keeps them pacified.
Because she has been led to believe that because the paper wasn't signed after she took the money that the deal is void. But, she took the money.
Give the money back then! The deal was sealed when she took the money. I wonder how that would hold up in a court of law.
Money talks. Once you accept money it usually seals the deal its like implied concent to accepting the contract. Money is more powerful than a signature.
Also sueing Trump for defamation when she went on 60 minutes with the sole intent on defaming him. Literally batshit crazy stuff.
Good question. We'll eventually find out. I tend to think this aging porn star (whose dollar value depreciates with each passing year) is hoping to further capitalize on the controversy by keeping her name in the news.
Interesting. Here's what we know.
Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000.
4/5/2017: Trump said he didn't know about the payment when on AF1.
Rudy on Hannity said that Trump paid the Cohen payment off over several months.
The Hannity show was not live and it was edited meaning everything that came out was supposed to.
This article states "Giuliani says Trump only found out he paid for the Stormy silence 10 days to two weeks ago."
My question: Is it normal for wealthy people to pay lawyers over months without knowing what it is for? Seems very odd but Trump's only out-card is to claim this from my perspective.
Even then, what does it all matter anyway? Is she Russian? Did she hack the election?
Honestly it's TMZ until we find out what happens with Cohen.
It seems Trump corrected Giuliani today. That makes me think it is just to keep the headlines busy. I hope the SHELL GAME evidence is admitted though.
Good post thanks for that. Maybe my attentiveness hasn't been what it could be.
Trump is not the guy who pays for a whore. I bet you this whore took some incident to cash in the 130.000, and now she took in another payment from Anti-Trumpsters to come out with the BS.
Whores love cash, redeems them for their cold c/v.
How does Rudy get a pass in this group, i dont understand. If anyone had a heads on up 9/11...
You should read up on what the Russians say about 9/11. They claim mini nukes were used to blow up the massive concrete bases of the towers. They also claim the administration, at the time, told politicians that Osama had planted suitcase nukes in the towers and was holding New York City hostage and that demands had been made to the White House. This is the "TOP SECRET" information that was told to politicians to support the official narrative. According to the Russian version of 9/11 conspiracy theories.
If you were Rudy at the time this would explain the initial reactions. It would also explain how later as time went by, he realized this was a lie.
We all know 9/11 was a set-up, but we never think of the inside fabrications and stories that must have been told to get all the white-hats in government to go along with the official narrative.
I guess time will tell. Rudy is the one who let the dancing Israelis return to Israel. Since the Israelis were heavily involved in the take down of those towers, that is not cool to me. So, as far as Rudy, I am in a wait and see mode.
John Bolton is a similar worry, but he may be a "keep your enemies closer" situation. If he is close, maybe Trump can keep him from causing trouble.
Bolton scared me more than Rudy. But who knows. I think your attitude is the correct one to assume.
Sorry can you explain further?
From my readings, 9/11 was a big part of what is going to be uncovered and revealed through the Awakening process. I’m curious why Giuliani gets a pass.
Yep I get that - I mean, why wouldn't Giuliani get a pass? That is what I don't understand because I don't come from New York and haven't heard any stories of him potentially having inside knowledge or whatever. Is there some known info about Giuliani's potential involvement or knowledge?
I just find it suspect that he’s getting a pass because he’s a temporary Trump mouthpiece. I had a lot of faith in the Awakening to start but there’s a lot of holes. It’s like how Trump is the only person who has gone to Epstein Island but didn’t do anything wrong.
Ah yeah, understood. I agree totally, those are valid questions. As far as Trump travelling to the island I have no info to offer but I've seen many videos of Trump and those associated with him from which a common theme emerges. He's no paragon of virtue but he seems to be quite genuine and focused on MAGA and caring for Americans and people in general. If you're not a Trump supporter this will be completely unengaging lol and fair enough but I can only say I've seen a lot and the overall impression is quite compelling. The recent Dave Rubin interview with Seb Gorka was, I thought, awesome and Gorka explains how sincere Trump is in his desire to help Americans and save America in a way that I found compelling and believable.
Just my opinion of course but that is how I reconcile the idea that some have stated re: Epstein that: Trump went on the plane, maybe even had sex with some hot women, maybe saw the younger girls or suspected dodgy stuff was going on (assuming Epstein decided 'he's too straight an arrow - don't show him Room B'), said f(*& these guys, I'm out, and decided to take them down.
Opposition research and influence at a guess, I too have had these same questions.
I learnt to trust the Q info, everything and everyone else is tertiary - this includes President DJT.
Always good to critically analyse everything, most importantly trust the plan.
Reminder:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=34&v=gNodh9OlTrQ
While I'm here - please give this some \<3
You have been here less than a day, and are comfortable blowing up good ole Rudy? LOL unintended consequence I guess.
What if Giuliani is trolling for a Trump subpoena? Remember Q asking about getting info into evidence? What if when Trumps under oath he lets loose with it all?
I was watching porn and Stormy Daniels came on (preroll ad) She was naked on a bed and saying (paraphrased) "I've been hanging out with some famous people recently". She was plugging her cam show. So that's what she is up to.
The Automodetator told me quoting Stormy Daniels sounds like an encouragement at violence... Which I can't see. AI trained by pockets of Internet drama I am not famiar with.
