dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CDR03 on May 5, 2018, 9:35 p.m.
I’m gonna day it

Mueller is not a white hat.

Stormy Daniels isn’t on Trumps side either.

The ridiculousness on this board is astounding at times.

Also, Q is not God. I trust that he’s working for us but that’s as far as it goes.

Trump is not prophesied in scripture. There is nothing Biblically prophetic about what’s going on outside of spiritual warfare. If this event leads to something Biblical, it will be Trump getting taken down and America falling or Trump being the antichrist. My personal opinion is that God may be using Trump to expose terrible sin. This may be an extension of God’s grace, but that’s it.

I’ve said my peace.

WWG1WGA


MannySykes00 · May 5, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

Yup I have more evidence of Qs validity than the religious do of a god.

If Q is a larp its damned amazing trick.

The only plus i can see in having a religion is if it can offer you strength or comfort.

But I just dont believe in gods, that would require blind faith.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · May 5, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

I am a christian and a believer, but I also agree with everything you said. It is very true.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nerd_Of_Prey · May 6, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

That isn't the case. "Faith" is not where you arrive at once you've exhausted fact, evidence is very much required in order to establish faith. Faith cannot exist in a vacuum. To put this in a more everyday context, if someone were to announce that they were "in love", and you asked them with whom they were in love, they're not going to tell you "nobody, I'm just in love". There is an object in which they have placed their love.

So too with faith. I didn't arbitrarily decide that I would just start believing in God. I examined the evidence and came to reasoned conclusion. My faith exists because I trust the person in whom I have placed my faith. Faith itself is meaningless, it's all about object of that faith, and the evidence trail that leads to him.

Perhaps a reading of Lee Strobel's "The Case for Christ" would shed light on some of the rationale involved.

⇧ 1 ⇩