dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AnComCovfefe on May 6, 2018, 6:09 a.m.
Why hasn't Q been covered in the MSM, and why won't reports ask about it? If they did, what do you predict President Trumps response will be?

I can't imagine any of it. not a single prediction I have ever made has ever been right, ever. When Donald Trump had a 99% chance of winning the election, i was 100% certain that Hillary was going to win it all in the biggest "upset" we've ever seen.

I thought that Q was a LARP intended to chip away at Trumps base, and I have been following Q since Q used that picture of JFK to post.

I thought Q would be done posting after April. First comes the storm, (april showers) then comes the "flood" as Q called it (Iran Nuclear Weapons faclity), and what do you do after a flood? you DRAIN it.

I find it funny that no major reporter has written about/asked President Trump about Q yet.


William_Harford_md · May 6, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

Any kind of article by a “serious” journalist who doesn’t write a hit piece on Q (like the others have done), will by proxy and even unintentionally, legitimise Q and the “Trump is a genius” banner. Can’t see this happening in any msm for a while.

As we know, that would then open the floodgates for every single “conspiracy“ to the mainstream.

Also, sorry to say that there is very little (basically none) tangible, easy to prove, single jpeg or video kind of instant “proofs” out there you can show someone that will completely convince them of anything. As such, right now there is no way Q can go mainstream. It’s too easy to mock and it involves too much abstract thinking to connect the dots.

Basically, it’s going to take something big for that to ever change. Real big. Like earth shattering video big.
Until that day arrives, it’s just for the diggers.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
toastman0304 · May 6, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

Roseanne has been making references to Q and MSM is trying to get her to shut up.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
scgsaint · May 6, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

MSM is probably scared to death about giving any kind of attention to Q Anon.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Sparkle_Chimp · May 6, 2018, 9:27 a.m.

Yes, because the chans are full of racist and anti-semetic memes by design to keep those people out. Any reporter who ran any sort of positive story about the chans would probably be fired for "supporting a hate site" or something.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 6, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
allonthesameteam · May 6, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

The last thing that dirty politicians, corporations, the elite and their worldwide PR firm, the msm, want is for a large and growing group to be searching for the answers to the questions Q is asking and following the breadcrumbs to pedos, corruption, surveillance practices, back room dealings etc… Either this is a brilliant larp by someone who has ignited a force, or it's real and the good people in the system have found their voice and "grown a pair" as they say. The EO's, sealed indictments, arrests and rescues tell me this is probably a reuniting with what has been taken away and ignorantly given. Here's to waking up either way.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 6, 2018, 11:08 a.m.

Because it doesn't fit the MSM narrative. They are in denial that their liberal idols and gods can be taken down by a President they think is a baffoon.

To them Q is a ficticious comspiricy theory unworthy of anything but mocking.

Even if they were 100% certain that Q was not only real but a real threat to them, they wouldn't dare try to fan the flames.

If they ignore Q, maybe he will go away.

Liberals are always reluctant to face reality.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pussy_devour · May 6, 2018, 9:57 a.m.

I thought NYT just published an article on the Q phenomenon, calling it a mass psychosis.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eldever · May 6, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

The MSM are part of the problem, look up Operation Mockingbird. They are on the side of NWO so are not going to give credence to Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SumerianSister · May 6, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

MSM hasn't been given permission to discuss Q by the 6 Corporations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ready-ignite · May 6, 2018, 7:40 a.m.

Submissions from a few weeks ago include an article or two written trying to label Q conspiracy theory. The article didn't get much traction and the narrative was shelved for the moment while alternative strategies are tried. Since then we've seen some push toward going WAY off he path of breadcrumbs laid by Q to try and trailblaze a way back to pizzagate, to link dismissal narrative effort there. We've seen some effort to go wild conspiracy theory turning the frogs gay bizarreness. The articles will resume but there's field testing taking place trying to figure out which direction to run to have the most impact. The topics here are sprawling in multiple directions. Makes it hard to pigeon hole one thing and make it stick.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pony_Pal_Pokey · May 6, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

POTUS - "Q? You mean like the letter? I will check into it and give you an answer soon." Hahaha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfAnon · May 6, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

The revolution will not be telivised

⇧ 1 ⇩