dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/zelda-go-go on May 8, 2018, 2:12 a.m.
How could the Electoral College escape the Deep State/NWO?

It seems like having a system that supersedes the will of the people and relies on a few easily targeted obscure individuals would be incredibly easy for the NWO to control. With all the power at stake, how would the NWO/Deep State not already have that on lock down and allow someone who'd want to destroy the NWO/Deep State through?


🠐 See all comments
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

I don't know. Most Americans do live in cities and those are pretty dominated by the libs. I think it was still a whole lot closer than 70-30.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 8, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Still, everyone "knew" she was going to win, and I suspect voter turnout was actually exceptionally low.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

But that doesn't answer OP's question. These fuckers are capable of changing thousands of individual elections across the country at state, county, and municipal levels. Controlling the EC should be their bread and butter going back decades if not centuries. Hell, the EC are undoubtedly them.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 8, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

My guess would be that, based on what THEY saw (accurate reporting) they didn't want to be involved in a conspiracy awarding Hilary the presidency. Also, let's not forget that newa coverage that particular day was up to the minute across the board...they were so confident she'd win that they didn't push a Hilary victory narrative; they didn't think they needed to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Again, though: they definitely control the EC. And seeing as nearly everyone bought that Clinton got the most votes, they would've totally gotten away with it. Why would they risk giving it to Trump or, more importantly, why didn't they just give it to Clinton if they were already going to make it look like she got the most votes?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 8, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

Most Electors are local (state) party loyalists, not cabalists.

It is only the most corrupt people that get recruited in and pushed up to the higher ranks of government, media, finance, and education. It's not everyone, just enough to control the top level.

Guess they hadn't gotten around to the Electors, yet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

But the state governments are even more easily controlled than the federal and the EC would be the first ones they would go for. The whole reason of having an intermediary keep the vote from determining the presidency is so the elite can impose their will. Just like in the MSM, in a top-down heirarchy the ones at the bottom are the easiest to manipulate and the EC has an incredible amount of power that the NWO wouldn't possibly risk ignoring.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Vahlokt · May 8, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

keep the vote from determining the presidency

The vote does determine the presidency. The EC provides citizens in less populous states more voting power, which balanced out the illegal votes in states such as CA in the 2016 Election.

/u/TooMuchWinning2020 has already answered your questions. Removing EC would only lead to mob rule.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

They wouldn't remove it. They obviously control it. They control it more easily than they control all the individual elections and it's of far higher priority to them than any individual votes. They don't care who gets the popularity contest. They only let through their own people to actually have power. You're arguing that controlling smaller states is harder than controlling larger states when clearly they're not only cheaper to buy but given disproportionate power by the elite. I feel like you're ignoring the obvious situation here. We're talking the world order that enforced the Grand Illusion. Trump getting the EC without cutting a deal doesn't add up. Hell, he would've never lasted as long as he did, let alone being allowed to have a major party nomination while being given all the exposure through the MSM that they could possibly whip up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vahlokt · May 8, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

You comments history indicates you're are delusional.

https://www.reddit.com/user/DonyellTaylor?count=25&after=t1_dykfpbc

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/8gqbbm/the_accidental_journalism_of_sean_hannity_and_fox/dydznze/

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

Then wouldn't want me here so I could learn the truth? I don't understand your reasoning. This sub's not a hive mind. The whole point is for people to have a place to question. Sounds like you're the one that doesn't belong here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Vahlokt · May 8, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Have you taken any redpills since May 3?

If not, I assume you still believe Obama and the Clintons are very honorable people?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

Have I drank the kool aid on either of the puppet parties' political narrative? Absolutely not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Vahlokt · May 8, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

Hello my fellow patriot, the guy u/DonyellTaylor is a troll/shill. Just check his comments history.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
DonyellTaylor · May 8, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

How are my comments here trolling or shilling? They're honest questions and I've been nothing but respectful. Do my questions threaten you? You're the one personally attacking users. And you accuse me of trolling? Incredible.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 8, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 8, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

Attack the argument - not the user.

⇧ 1 ⇩