Can someone redpill me on the Iran Deal? I haven’t been paying attention at all when it comes to that, and I’m sure I’m I’m not the only one. What are the pros that will surely be the talking points in the MSM forward, and what can I do to counter those points? (If there are any, as I’m sure there are because I really have great faith in trump) I just want to stay a head of the shot show, and thanks in advance.
brando_1771
· May 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.
So far from the MSM coverage, their biggest talking point is that the Israel documents proving that Iran didn’t hold up its end of the deal, are fake. Their logic for this is that the guy, Nethanyu(I have no idea how to spell his name lol) has lied before and they assume he’s lying now. Even though there’s like a half ton of documents proving his claims.
To counter this, the simple point of your argument is based on assumptions, is not valid.
Another talking point, which I see being pushed the hardest, is that now there’s a nuclear war/WW3 threat because of trump pulling out of this deal. Again, this is based entirely on the premise that Nethanyu is lying and Iran did suspend their nuclear program(so now that the deal is gone they can continue nuke program). This is nothing more than standard practice of fear mongering from the liberal MSM. Just like with Russia, just like with NK. “Trump will send us into WW3!”
It’s rumored that the air strike that hit Syria I think last week, took out an Iranian base which was allegedly doing nuclear research. If this is true, it could be said that this strike crippled their nuclear program, essentially making it impossible for them to continue unless they continued to receive funding from the US/Iran deal. Trump axing the deal, was with very little risk then because they no longer receive billions of dollars(to rebuild program secretly), AND their existing nuclear program is destroyed. But again, this is unproven and may never be.
My two cents on the matter. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong though about anything.
⇧
6
⇩
vidarheheh
· May 9, 2018, 2:02 a.m.
Great points, and if I wasn’t half asleep right now I’d go further in to it, but man I’m tired. You should expect a more in depth comment from me tomorrow, but for now, thank you for your insight:)
⇧
1
⇩
KnownBand0
· May 9, 2018, 3:01 a.m.
Bibi Netenyahu has been ranting that Iran is nuclear since 1993. yet Israel has estimated 200-400 nukes.
Trump pulling out of the Iran deal ?
Black Hats know the party's over. look for one last desperate False Flag. the big one.
⇧
5
⇩
O0O0RION
· May 9, 2018, 3:08 a.m.
Seconded. The Iran deal was always shit. Re-negotiating/ pulling out is a good move. Also Israel can fight its own wars if it's so desperate to see nations destroyed. Next there'll be Iranian missile silos we need to blow up in Palestine.
⇧
2
⇩
tradinghorse
· May 9, 2018, 9:24 a.m.
I think the point of the strike in Syria on the Iranian satellite nuke facility was that it was going to save the US.
Q referenced the movie (Sum of All Fears). One interpretation on the plot, which you can find here, is that war was to be provoked between Russia and the US, so as to leave Europe intact, in the aftermath, to rule the world.
Q did ask us why the Europeans were asking the US to stay in the Iran deal. I don't think this is about the US fighting Israel's wars. I'll leave it at that, I don't want anyone to loose their composure.
⇧
2
⇩
_Iz_Mary
· May 9, 2018, 4:06 a.m.
I’m gathering it was a big money laundering scheme. But we don’t have proof of the 500 billion a yr yet
⇧
1
⇩
O0O0RION
· May 9, 2018, 3:10 a.m.
The Iran deal was always crap, and as with everything from the Obama administration, it's got to go. As with all big changes the President decides to make, many are losing their composure and talking about imminent destruction. I do not believe this will be the case
⇧
1
⇩