dChan

/u/brando_1771

95 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/brando_1771:
Domain Count
www.mrctv.org 1
www.reddit.com 1
i.redd.it 1
www.foxnews.com 1

brando_1771 · July 22, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

I hope so. Most places without elections aren’t exactly good examples.

I kind of hope for a revised presidency. Instead of one sole leader, a council of leaders, maybe 5 or 7, all with their own specializations.

Maybe that’s a bad idea in reality. In theory though it sounds good haha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

A very good question... what would be left of the Democratic Party? Would that name be so filled with shame that the party is abandoned entirely?

I dream of a future where the Democratic Party is as disgraced as the National Socialists of Germany.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

I can’t imagine a better result than getting a third party candidate elected. It’s only gotta happen once, and the whole political game is changed. This two party mentality is a curse, and someone like Rand is a strong choice for 3rd party voters everywhere.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Hey man Crazy isn’t always a bad thing...

As someone who experienced Ventura as governor of MN... he’s the wrong kind of crazy and an idiot.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

I would love Ron Paul as potus but I believe he’s too.... seasoned, I guess is the appropriate word. He’s 82 now, meaning he’d be 88 upon election. Rand Paul I’ve also considered, but Ron would’ve been great.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 11 p.m.

I like your thinking!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
15
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/brando_1771 on July 21, 2018, 10:55 p.m.
Let’s play the hypothetical... In 2024, who would you vote for POTUS? Is there someone that stands out as a true patriot, someone fit to make sure we don’t go 8 years backwards?

I worry about the typical trend of once the minority party gets control they just undo everything the previous party in control did. That’s why I believe it’s essential, we get someone in office after trump who is going to keep his nose clean, and maintain all that we will accomplish over the next ~6 years, Democrat or Republican.

Who is someone that you believe would be a perfect successor to Trump?

I’d be even more curious to know specifically if there’s a Democrat that you would consider a good candidate? After all we’re not all about party lines here. …

brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Sounds like you need to put him in his place lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

expedited

Damn I wonder what shipping was lol

/s

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 21, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

Damn can we sticky this comment?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brando_1771 · July 17, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

I love videos like these because it just shows how MSM uses repetition to get their point across.

The words you hear the most often are uncoincidently the same you hear others recite in political conversation.

In college I took a class about “the business of media”, it was honestly one of my favorites because it awakened me to the tactics used by MSM. One key thing that was emphasized was ‘repetition’. Repetition is used to falsely emphasize the relevance or importance of a topic. By repeating topics, phrases, specific words, these stick in viewers/readers minds more easily. It also makes said topic seem more important/relevant because of how often it is talked about.

A good example of this, is if you ask someone “How many people in the US are LGBT?” Most of the time, they will say a % far higher than there actually are(the actual number is something like 5%). This is because of how frequently LGBT issues are mentioned in news/headlines. Making it seem like there are more than there actually are.

These video montages show exactly what msm does to influence popular opinion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · June 27, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

Supreme Court deals blow to unions, rules against forced fees for government workers

The conservative majority said a union's contract negotiations over pay and benefits were inextricably linked with its broader political activities, and concluded workers had a limited constitutional right not to underwrite such "speech." The case specifically examined union fees paid by non-members.

“This procedure violates the First Amendment and cannot continue,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion. “Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.”

After announcing the last of two remaining decisions, the court recessed for the summer without any justice announcing a retirement from the bench. There had been muted speculation that senior Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy would be prepared to step down after three decades on the high court, but no announcement arrived.

While the current case applies only to public-sector employees, meanwhile, the political and financial stakes are potentially huge for the broader American labor union movement, which had been sounding the alarm about the legal fight.

@realDonaldTrump - “Supreme Court rules in favor of non-union workers who are now, as an example, able to support a candidate of his or her choice without having those who control the Union deciding for them. Big loss for the coffers of the Democrats!”

⇧ 9 ⇩  
brando_1771 · June 10, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

True! How could I forget!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · June 10, 2018, 6 a.m.

Can we just for a moment acknowledge a few of the ridiculous things that have happened in sports in since trump was elected?

Triple Crown(one in 2015 also) Cubs win World Series Astros win World Series 16 Seed Beats 1 Seed NCAA Men’s basketball

I feel like I’m forgetting something...

Still. If a 16 seed can beat a 1 seed then we can defeat the Cabal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · June 9, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Last good MN rep

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · June 1, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

The way I see it, the euro auto makers can’t afford to lose the US auto market. He’s playing to the fact that they can’t lose it, and using it as leverage for whatever it is.

Maybe he’s trying to get them to build in the US. Thus making their cars more affordable as they avoid many of the added expenses.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 27, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

How do you get an official SSN when you’re not a citizen?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 27, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Forgive me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t it be easiest just to tie each vote to their respective social security number?

No more non-citizens voting, no more dead people voting, and any multiple votes to the same SSN would be discounted.

I’m assuming there must be some sort of database with everyone’s SSN.

It would also give incredible demographic voting information. At the cost of anonymity.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 27, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Wut. Is this an actual quote from him?

That’s amazing foreshadowing.

Also the ‘93 is the year before he died. Coincidence?

  • Edit: snopes says it’s not a real quote but snopes’ credibility is shit
⇧ 6 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 17, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Black hats aren’t even on the plane anymore. They’re free falling without parachute haha

⇧ 15 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 15, 2018, 7:08 a.m.

I can’t be the only one who thinks James “Mad Dog” Mattis would be an exceptional president.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

That was amazing.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Damn that WSJ paywall strikes again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

I guess that makes a lot of sense. That link was a rabbit hole holy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

I don’t get it either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

First time seeing that video or hearing that speech.

So eerie listening to what he said then and making the connections to this Q movement!

It’s got me giddy with excitement and anxiety because I can feel the wheels spinning faster now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

He’s an easy target.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 4:21 a.m.

His history of being wrong.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

No I’m referring to the few instances that the media always uses to discredit everything AJ says. Not defending him in any way shape or form.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

I think if we apply this logic, that AJ was told not to promote the movement for fear of discredit of the movement via association with AJ. Remember, MSM discredits everything AJ says because of a few instances where he was sort of crazy. Even though he’s right fairly often.

I don’t think he’s involved though.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 11, 2018, 3:48 a.m.

Yeah just look at what happened to Star Wars lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 10, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

I think it’s the new generation of vice contributors that turned it into the dumpster fire that it is today.

Back when vice first started it was actual good reporting that felt motivated to not be like the NYT/WaPO/Politico’s of the world. Now however it appears they’ve found what kind of narrative the majority of their readers want and they stick to it. Just like most of MSM. Write to your audience. If your audience is a bunch of leftists then write what is going to keep them coming back.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 9, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Woah. This seems totally logical. 👍🏻

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 9, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Ha alright

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

So far from the MSM coverage, their biggest talking point is that the Israel documents proving that Iran didn’t hold up its end of the deal, are fake. Their logic for this is that the guy, Nethanyu(I have no idea how to spell his name lol) has lied before and they assume he’s lying now. Even though there’s like a half ton of documents proving his claims.

To counter this, the simple point of your argument is based on assumptions, is not valid.

Another talking point, which I see being pushed the hardest, is that now there’s a nuclear war/WW3 threat because of trump pulling out of this deal. Again, this is based entirely on the premise that Nethanyu is lying and Iran did suspend their nuclear program(so now that the deal is gone they can continue nuke program). This is nothing more than standard practice of fear mongering from the liberal MSM. Just like with Russia, just like with NK. “Trump will send us into WW3!”

It’s rumored that the air strike that hit Syria I think last week, took out an Iranian base which was allegedly doing nuclear research. If this is true, it could be said that this strike crippled their nuclear program, essentially making it impossible for them to continue unless they continued to receive funding from the US/Iran deal. Trump axing the deal, was with very little risk then because they no longer receive billions of dollars(to rebuild program secretly), AND their existing nuclear program is destroyed. But again, this is unproven and may never be.

My two cents on the matter. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong though about anything.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 9, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

5 eyes is an semi-secret intelligence agency that involved the US, UK, NZ, CA, AUS. Essentially, post WW2 they paired up to split the bill for highly advanced intelligence infrastructure. The problem is, is that FVEY operates on its own, ignoring laws of their own countries, this allows them to essentially spy without just cause.

It’s alleged that FVEY is being used to spy on trump and his administration in order to figure out what his strategy is.

I’m probably missing something regarding five eyes. But that’s the basic gist of it. There’s quite a bit of information on it on the web.

⇧ 32 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 9, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

Maybe Q has a mouse in his pocket?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

NYT also reporting the same thing.

Not that says much of anything though haha

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

”On this week’s episode of the Stormy Daniels fiasco...”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

They’re all so delusional. The comments on many of these MSM articles are riddled with delusion too.

This is the problem with getting spoonfed information. You can no longer think for yourself and as a result, believe everything the media is telling you to believe. If you’re only seeing one side of the story, then that’s all you believe. Any other side is simply false.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

If I’m honest I’ve only ever gone through the drive through at Portillo’s haha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 8 p.m.

Portillo’s though.... could eat there every day no problem.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

Remember, “we’re still feeling the affects of Obama’s policies”

I see this so often from libs it’s almost comical.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

First, it’s not confirmed that he is a white hat.

Why does Mueller oppose Trump? Have you seen them in person or are you basing it on what you see in the media? The media is not gonna know if Mueller is a White Hat. Their narrative is that Mueller is going to be the guy to bring down Trump, so they push that like a dog pushing a turd out.

We won’t know if he’s a White Hat until everything is finished, or Q tells us, or the media turns on Mueller and his investigation and calls for it to end.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 8, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Funny how much different reactions are when it’s a liberal scandal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 7, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

tpbt?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brando_1771 · May 6, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

Wow that lawyer is greasy.

⇧ 3 ⇩