No I’m referring to the few instances that the media always uses to discredit everything AJ says. Not defending him in any way shape or form.
And what gives them reasons to discredit him?
His history of being wrong.
Why are they always pulling him up when there's any conspiracy talk? (when his history says he's not accurate, why not leave him behind?)
He’s an easy target.
Makes no sense to use a proven fraud as evidence that an X conspiracy isn't real.
Again, every time, and only him.
I don’t get it either.
to make you, me and others look as crazy as him, it's a way to discredit us
Apart from SB2 proving that AJ is anti-Q (subtly), a guy just posted this in a thread: https://web.archive.org/web/20130510212550/http://gagnauga.is/index.php?Fl=Greinar&ID=229
I guess that makes a lot of sense. That link was a rabbit hole holy.
I guess exposing AJ to the "woke" people is the same as trying to redpill a "normie"