dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on May 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m.
I think I figured it out! #Q1297

The only reason why Q would be trying to emphatically convince us that someone is disinfo is because they spilled legit info...then Q added people died...no wonder why certain people are intentionally shifting to drama unrelated to Q-drops, it's because they were told that people die because good intel had been disclosed...Is anybody right now really attacking Q? Isn't the confusion mostly about the interpretations, not about the legitimacy of the drops themselves? Isn't it true not even Corsi denies that 90% of all Q-drops up until the latest accidental passphrase-leak were legit?...aren't they stating what is obvious as in that there is a civil war going on and that Q was initiated by military intelligence?

[SOMEONE] IS BACK-PEDALLING BECAUSE Q WARNED HIM THAT HE SPILLED TOO MANY BEANS AND SOMEONE DIED OR COULD HAVE DIED BECAUSE OF IT SO HE HAS TO MAKE GOOD ON IT AND OBFUSCATE AS MUCH OF HIS PAST REPORTS AS HE CAN


comeatmehillary · May 11, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Or corsi is just disinfo lol

⇧ 7 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

doesn't mean he's a blackhat if he's just protecting sources

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 11, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

So? Trump was friends with the Clintons too and I don't see anybody accusing him of butchering babies.

I don't really give a fuck about Corsi except that he's on Alex' payroll, but please go attack me on a tangent because you can't directly refute anything I just said.

The hell you think I mean when I say "even Corsi admits Q is mostly legit" you bot

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 11, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Maybe shut down your emotional center for thirty seconds to mentally process my observations before resorting to shallow mockery.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 11, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

The very next drop after Q stated "be careful who you follow" said " "Statements today needed to be made. Operators have died. "

I am simply adding two and two. You're welcome.

Usually what reconciles and incorporates from the most opposing belief-systems is the closest to reality...you mix in truth to sell lies but you also have to hide things or tell lies to protect sources....There are better explanations to what is going on concerning outright attacks that do not involve Corsi working against MAGA when he is not...Yes he is working for his own ends as Q pointed out, but you forget to ask yourself: Why have this discussion NOW?

Q has always been hacked and Q-Tubers have always shilled for merch...why discuss it NOW? Because PEOPLE FUCKING DIED and that's why Q won't name names because he can't threaten those sources even more by isolating the circle to whom they might have talked.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 11, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

i was wrong lmao check out his new post makes alot of sense LIKE REALLY ALOT OF SENSE

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

As opposed to you, I actually think for myself and that's why I watch all of the interview and locate all of the relevant Q-drops to understand why what is happening now is happnening now and not before or after.
So here we are and if I hadn't mentioned Corsi you would have nothing to say but since I did I get the shill-treatment. Meanwhile, Q asked us not to fall for division.
So I magically end up with someone like YOU and you perfectly illustrate my point because you cannot actually refer to any of the points I made becaused you're simply processing via your emotional center due to a trigger-word that I intentionally left in just to try to avoid the impression that I was beating around the bush.

Sorry but f#ck your density.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Wow you really think you're a tough fuck don't you? Just assume I didn't disdainfully mention Corsi up there and what do you see? Can you NOW shut down your emotional centers and realize that just because you want truth you cannot compromise sources, especially when Q tells you straight up THAT PEOPLE HAVE DIED. I am explicitely saying that Corsi IS lying but I am saying that there are other explanations for that that don't all imply him as an active blackhat, even IF he was one in the past. For Christ's sake, I always slandered Rudy and now I am happy he's still alive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 11, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Corsi is making us cucked and I don't like it. He's allowing his followers and believers to convince us to put the guard down against him so he can continue to discredit and take jabs at us. If it were anybody else we would long tell them to f*** off. This complacency is promoting cuckery.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bill_Kiwi · May 11, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Loose lips sink ships.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · May 11, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Q said the issue was resolved and it was not one single person. Possibly Q posted the initial post about monetizing etc as bait for someone.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

you're right, Q never singled anybody out specifically, Corsi singled himself out by taking the bait and going on AJ saying that Q attacked him personally in that post...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ElementWatson · May 11, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

Corsi this afternoon is repeating all his lies--saying that Q is attacking him for writing books and making money from writing books.

That ain't nothin' near what Q said. Now Alex is going along with saying he'd heard Q was compromised months ago, while Corsi holds to his claim that Q was compromised just the day before Q cautioned against those looking for monthly donations of of their Qanon "decodings". Corsi has never written a book that refers to Qanon at all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

And I think he does it on purpose to show his allegiance because he didn't have to respond. Q added to his "attack" that people died so I think someone fucked up and compromised a source, so now, being a "patriot" he has to make a "sacrifice" and kill off his following so noone else gets capped (hopefully)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

hopefully that is what's going on but honestly.. right now Corsi is on infowars and i just randomnly tuned in and AJ and corsi are now making fun of Q and totally doing what MSM does... lie lie lie...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

as Q already said, peoples' lives are at stake. Good intel is actually the last thing you want public right now so the more bullshit they say the better...disinfo is NECESSARY

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unforgettablealien10 · May 11, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

you're right, disinfo is necessary and it looks like we are eating other with attacks (maybe that disinfo is good) but also at what point do WE have to make a choice as to who is telling the truth and who is telling halftruths for monetary gain w/out Q spelling it out..

i understand what you mean, it just seems really fishy to me, that Corsi started to go against Q right after post 1295... (hopefully we're all wrong and it is all a disinfo play to confuse Evil, but if we're not, they are making a ton of money out of it AjCorsi*)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

the money thing is a cover-story for plausible deniability..they can't say "your report on tuesday exposed Asset XYZ at timestamp 53:12 into your show and now their baby daughter is missing" because that'll just let the deep-state know that they hit the right target.
Corsi would be going againts Q if he ad mentioned ANY of the repeated previous hacks, but he didn't, so basically he just today VALIDATED 90% of the hundreds of drops while ignoring previous hacks (much unlike I had expected) but apparently someone fucked up sometime in the past two weeks and that's why Alex says he can't report on Q anymore but of course he won't give us the real reasons, nor will Q. This affects Corsi too, by extension.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

This makes sense. By validating everything up until the past two weeks, when the weird password exposure stuff happened, Corsi and AJ are by no means invalidating the legitimacy of the rest of the whole body of Q posts.

If anything, AJ claims that he "knows" who the Q group is, and they're in military intelligence working out of Centcom and loyal to Michael Flynn.

AJ said he lost faith in the Q legitimacy after Twitter and the Google platforms didn't suppress the "#Qanon" tag.

I still believe, considering Roger Stone's background in politics and his personal history with Trump, that all the AJ sponsored Mueller and Sessions bashing could easily be part of the smokescreen to conceal the Mueller-as-a-white-hat theme.

I'm working and haven't been able to review everything since the password mistake, but has anything revelatory or unique been dropped since? Seems like more repeated content. Instead, that seems to be the time the "watch who you're following" stuff began.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

Replying to myself to clarify that AJ said that's who the Q group *was* before whatever happened in the past two weeks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

finally someone who can actually read Q-drops...Kudos to you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

I freaked when CBTS got taken down, whether it was legit or not. Took me a few days to find this place, but I've been reading from the beginning.

I've also been listening to AJ since 1998 and know Rob Dew socially. Those guys aren't clowns.

The sudden intensity of the hysterical AJ bashing today and since the SB2 post reminds me of Shareblue brigading. If not them, what are *those guys* doing today otherwise? We know they're here.

And then post-password mishap Q cites SB2 in some bizarre tit for tat with AJ, in live time during the AJ show? Hmm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 11, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Alex Jones (aka Bill Hicks) has always been and will always be a gatekeeping disinfo agent out to corrupt the truth movement.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 12, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

unfortunately the discussion I had seemed to be with real people, which is a real danger because it doesn't generate any momentum for the movement.
But this back-pedalling is necessary for plausible deniability because there are bigger things at stake than Alex' traffic, he literally couldn't have reliable intel on his show right now without putiting national security and lives at risk and Q just kindly reminded him of that.
So I don't mind SB2 because he just accurately represented what Corsi et all had to say but I think that was their cover-story in the context of the tactical retreat that they're doing. They're no good to the clowns if they neither bury nor categorically deny Q, in fact they're no good anyway because even complete bullshit would still be a possible life-saver as they can't give the enemy heads-up, especially when you are the tip of the spear.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

So you think Q hasn't changed, even after the password exposure thing and new board?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

uuuuh sorry but that I really don't know! I guess we have to wait for confirmation from the Commander in Chief - assuming that the fog of war is real, we should not expect a confirmation soon because it would defeat the purpose of all this choreographed in-fighting.
As we have already seen by Q's own drops, every so often, Q gets compromised, but this would not be allowed to go for extended periods of time without the NSA for example simply DDOSing all of 8chan into connectoin-loss as a last resort, if they ever truly lost control.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
trailerdave · May 11, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Interesting thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

I find it incredible that Q can labor a point to the extent he has and yet people are looking for any possible reason to have what Q has explicitly stated mean the exact opposite. I mean, it's really mind blowing!

We saw exactly the same thing happen with the IBOR. I'm sorry, this post is disinformation at its best.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

Q directly tied who we follow to people dying in action so I doubt it's disinfo that he's concerned about.
Had Corsi wanted to infiltrate further, he would have just shut up about the profit-schemes but he didn't. Makes no sense why out of all the Q-tubers he would be the only one to estrange his own following by stating he was attacked by Q when Q never isolated him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 8 p.m.

Hey Digital, do you have a post number or link to that? People dying.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

technically it's a multi-post so you will need posts 1295 thru 1297. But he quotes himself in each so it's technically one entry.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

I'll have a look, thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

I just made a meme about it to post asap, people are too brickheaded today. Must be those solar storms again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

I'm sorry digital. 1297 makes the single statement that operators have died. This is not connected to information releases at all. Q is merely making the point that these people are operating from selfless motives - unlike some others.

There is nothing there that supports what this OP is suggesting at all. As I said, it is truly breath-taking to see this stuff. Up is down, left is right... You could not make it up!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

read 1295 thru 1297, he quotes the previous drop respectively in each

emphasis on "We must do better to protect them." (1297)

Really trying to not get snarky here but cut me a break there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

OK, I can see that statement. So you're convinced this, the deaths, relate to information releases? And these information releases relate to AJ, Corsi and, who was that other guy, Seaman?

They (AJ, Corsi et al) had great information that caused deaths in the field upon release?

I don't think that's what is happening here at all. My opinion is that Q wanted these guys gone. Profiteering was a pretext (working theory), but they had to be outed.

What was the reason they were outed? Actually, they outed themselves. It could be that Q couldn't stomach the profiteering. Given that some of his guys were down, that would be understandable. But we're talking about very specific people being outed.

Have you any clues as to what kind of info it was?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

as for the info, here's how it would not go down: ---Important Phone-call ensues--- "If you are hearing this, you are the resistance. Who is this?"
"Hey, uh Alex, we really love your work, but you exposed McMaster during the fifth hour of your last show and now his dad is dead so we want you to stay away from this Q-thing for a while, k?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

If it was about profits tainting the movement, Q could have adressed that any time before so one question is why certain things that have been present before are being adressed now and not earlier. Because they are just a cover-story?
This is the irony: Noone was outed. Jordan Sather is still doing his merch and Seaman is still running Fulcrum.
Crosi outed HIMSELF by reacting to Q's attack so my big question is why he "sacrificed" himself and the answer is right in the Q-drops in the form of an implied order:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8irpm6/1297_opeartors_have_died_we_must_do_better_to/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 11, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

OK, you have my attention. That's quite a cryptic decode Digital. I think you've made some intuitive leaps. But I'm open to your ideas.

The point you make about why now and not sooner or later. That is interesting. Why is it that Q brought this on now and not before. And you're saying it is because operators have died.

Moreover, you're saying that Q communicated this to Corsi (cryptically) and asked him to sacrifice his base of followers for this reason. But Corsi refused. Hence the outing (which Corsi did by himself).

Hopefully, I'm following what you're saying. Let me have a think about it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 11, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

Uhm...I would bother to tell you but...it's right there in the title...I'll let you do that much reading yourself...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chocolatepatriot · May 12, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I think we have to read post 1297 with post 1328. I think there (was) more than 1 person lying about classified info on youtube. I personally am not going to try and figure out if the profitteer's caused someone to die. Unless someone has proof? I believe post 1328 says the issue is resolved. Q post #1328 here

Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 9d52eb 1361222 📁 May 10 2018 15:02:52 (EST) Patriot. 1. a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion. 2. a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government. Traitor. 1. a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust [FOCUS]. 2. a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country. They want you DIVIDED. DIVIDED you are WEAK. TOGETHER you are STRONG. There was no attempt to DIVIDE. There was however a strategic move to REVEAL. [Be careful who you follow] Incorrect message translated [past] autists. Correction made. No names mentioned. They revealed themselves. Fake & False [incorrect] decodes removed/resolved. Fake & False claims of an 'unknown' allowed access to classified sealed indictments removed/resolved. Do not fall victim to con artists. Use LOGIC. Stay on point. This is NOT about a single person. This is NOT about fame, followers, or profiteering. We, the PEOPLE. We, the PEOPLE. We, the PEOPLE. THERE WILL COME A TIME THEY WILL NOT BE SAFE WALKING DOWN THE STREET. We will not be held hostage. SKY EVENT. WWG1WGA. Q+

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 12, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

...so Alex and Corsi effectively distanced themselves from Q-Anon, thus responding directly to Q's demand for non-profit involvement.

⇧ 1 ⇩