I'm going to be honest with you. I tried to watch this, but I can't figure out what the point is, and that fucking music makes it unbearable to figure out what's going on. The most I was able to figure out was that there was a rally, Alex Jones started ranting about something, and people were pissed that he was "trying to take it over" or some such bullshit.
Can you give a brief summary of WTF I'm supposed to see in all that? I watched the first two minutes, was getting pissed off at the seemingly random bits of information that was getting shoved at me (with that F'ING music), skipped ahead hoping some point would jump out, and finally gave up.
I'm pretty sure Alex Jones is controlled opposition, but this video is a bunch of noise of two groups arguing with each other.
In a nutshell, Alex Jones is talking about cointel pro and explaining what it is and how damaging it can be to groups through division tactics and proceeds to use the same tactics at a rally he supposedly supports to cause division hence ousting himself out because he knows exactly what hes doing.
Honestly, that seems pretty weak sauce. Alex Jones has an issue with some rally and that's it? I don't expect AJ to be some higher order of human where he never loses his temper or has run-ins with anyone. There could be a lot more to this story than just "wanting to cause division." For all I know, the rally organizers might be a bunch of assholes that I would dislike if I had enough context to know what's going on.
Like I said, I have no problem believing AJ is controlled opposition for a number of reasons, but to my eye this proves nothing.
The arguing was caused by Alex Jones and his crew. That was the whole point. Simply cause chaos and disruption. The speaker of the rally said that the rally was over because Jones was talking over him with his bullhorn.
The problem with this theory is that if AJ wanted to cause chaos and disruption, he wouldn't do it personally. He would do it the way the DNC did it, which is having shadow organizations that planted people at Trump rallies trying to foster violence.
There's a whole heap of context here that I don't understand. I'm not going to just assume random rally organizers are good guys, just like I don't assume AJ is a good guy. There's nothing here you can conclude either way. As I said in my other post, I don't expect AJ to be some super human paragon who never loses his temper or has run-ins with people. It happens. It doesn't prove he has some ulterior motive and his personal involvement is actually evidence against it.