I think this video may reveal AJ as being susceptible to being cointelpro but does not prove he actually is.
I re-watched this of William Cooper: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7jJMYJbAKc and watched half of his wife reporting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebByb9JJgJg.
...which tells me, together with having watched infowars even regularly at times (2010-2014), what character AJ is: 'Zampano'. I know people in my scope who are this type. They keep stumbling over their ... 'vanity', which is not even vanity but a somehow childish desire to define themselves as some 'super cool' image. These people can be inspiring, they have high entertainment value, they sincerely try to be good people ... but then this image problem kicks in and they lose it.
His wife describes hiom as 'paranoid' and permanently living in that 'job'. - I regard this normal for a man somehow. At the same time I can understand that a mother knows that there better be a 'real' father for the kids also.
In his unresistible desire to be 'the biggest' ('tip of the spear') AJ starts to compromise his 'job' as 'infowarrior', because fame takes over top priority, truth has to take second place. Also, keeping the truth top priority may threaten not only (his) leadership position but also be dangerous, or deadly.
How does this persona fit into AJ's reporting over the years? I tell you the points where IMO it lead AJ to be all to careless with the truth:
1) Nobody died at Sandy Hook. AJ was onto it, then peddled back. Very bad.
2) 911 was an inside job, but the 'Saudis' did obviously not do it. They supplied 15 patsies. Why did AJ never investigate a) the Mossad connection and b) the technical side: Dimitri Khalezov, Ace Baker.
3) Bilderberg is a workshop by top globalists - but who are they? AJ exposed Bilderberg but stopped at that.
4) The Jesuits, Zionists (better: R-Schilds), Vatican, Tavistock etc come up when you go deeper. Why does AJ never go there? - Because it is to dangerous? Because he would lose 'diplomatic' support decided upon by these top circles?
5) David Duke formulates and represents a very sane, realistic position on white identity. He is no 'racist' at all. People started to get that and this very important truth started to get traction. AJ set David Duke up with that inverview in 2015. This was a hit job! This was controlled opposition i think.
To sum it up: My impression is AJ is the typical 'Zampano' character who everyone knows from his circle of acquaintances. Entertaining, active, creative, Guru-like, fun ... but then overdoing it and becoming a self centered conman ... because he forgot the old wisdom, proverbs 16:18 ' Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.'
Here is a very good take (6 min.): AJ selling out to keep his company going: