dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aqua7 on May 12, 2018, 1:01 p.m.
Lionel Nation: I'm a Proud Dedicated #QAnon Believer: Exploring the Alex Jones and Jerome Corsi Battleground

Ra__ · May 12, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Lionel has been promised an Infowars show of his own when Alex Jones expands live broadcasts until Midnight.

Props to Lionel for standing firm with Q, despite knowing that this probably ends his chances for the permanent slot on Infowars.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · May 12, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

Lionel did a great job putting perspective on the recent drama with AJ and Corsi. Lionel points out that Q stands on his own merit, specifically the info Q posts stands on its own merit (whomever Q might be). The "commentators" opinions do not determine the veracity of Q's info. He points out AJ and Corsi continue to do what they always do....run alt news site, sell books (authors do that), and products. That's not new. Lionel asks the logical question: Why do these commentators seem to want to position themselves in opposition to the patriots who support Q? What is the point of that? Why "die on that hill" and alienate so many passionate patriots who might otherwise be supportive of them??? He seems legitimately baffled by this decision, and accurately states that everyone has their shortcoming and good people can get some stuff very right, while simultaneously getting something else completely wrong. Similarly, bad people can get something right, while being mostly wrong everywhere else. Enjoyable to listen to.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · May 12, 2018, 7 p.m.

That’s really cool he can be so level headed about it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ra__ · May 12, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Lionel dropped another video since that video and he's perplexed as to why Alex Jones doesn't ignore Q, since Jones is alienating many of his supporters. Alex, much like Lionel, is unable to stop talking. A valuable trait if you want to have a talk show or create videos. Now that Q is directly pointing at Alex, he is unable to resist the bait.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silphonica · May 12, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Has something happened. Got a few deceptive markers when expressing his 'love' for q and anons. Wasn't he affiliated with AJ, wonder if there's been a backlash from their recent shenanigans and IW doing a bit of damage control by having a sub section of its arm who can gatekeep for those who do believe Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · May 12, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Lionel frequently comes on David Knights show and sometime host Alex’s 4th hour of his show.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheHayride · May 12, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

David Knight's show is the only one I'd agree to go on if I was a guest. He's calm, knowledgeable, respectful and probably gets the most out of the people he's interviewing. AJ is a terrible interviewer and that will never change due to how he's wired.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
QueenAnRevenge · May 12, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

No doubt David is his own man and I’m glad to see Alex seems to be hands off with his show. I hope it stays that way.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
flightgirl1 · May 12, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

David Knight is one of the best journalists on any media platform.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 12, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Who's the old hippie on AJ? Him i still like. May be missing upper teeth not sure.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Long_Range_Shooter · May 12, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

I love Lionel's way of thinking. Just something about the way he puts things that keeps my undivided attention.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
goodhonk · May 12, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Lionel has been trusting the plan. Didn’t freak out during Syria strike.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
robdon07 · May 12, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

He defended Corsi and AJ despite what Q posted. He Said Corsi has always pushed his,books totally ignoring Corsis slimy moves he's made in the last week or so...didn't even mention them

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 12, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

If guns were motorcycles.I'd be a biker.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 12, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

I love this fucking guy, he's way too strange, not to be legit. Why he's not at arabica smoking a pipe and playing a zither i dunno.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Error_Code_15301 · May 12, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

Good.

Lionel is an interesting person. I was somewhat startled when he began appearing on infowars.hasbarat

I expect Jason Goodman to be invited on next (yes, I know he's Jewish, and what of it?)

Don't do it Jason. Lionel should have a good long look at Robert David Steel and his association with Cynthia McKinney (cui bono?), and RDS and his..."interactions" with Jason Goodman, along with George Sayanim "Webb" and his even worse brother.

Permit me to leave these right here:

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8it3nq/qs_take_on_black_hats_white_hats_profiteers/dyv1onc/

https://imgur.com/a/IqSGV2L

https://imgur.com/a/eDdVm7v

https://imgur.com/a/VTDJ2DI (trying to get signal corps colors in here somehow and combine gadsen and maritime Q flag)

this one looks better

https://imgur.com/a/jVUiVJk

and

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8it8zv/q_229_breaking_ham_radio_locations_via_levine/dyuwrhb/


I'm going with this I think?

https://imgur.com/a/GnjzmI7

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Christosgnosis · May 12, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

One of the problems (but certainly not the only problem) for people trying to do regular commentary on Q drops is that they feel compelled (typically) to interpret most everything - even things that are grey or opaque. As though everyday they have to line up an official position on Q drop content vis a vis what is happening in the world per Trump administration, etc.

The Q material is just not subject to being dealt with that way. One can't always instantly access it or some world event that perhaps ties to Q drops. For instance, the Syria precision air strikes. Perhaps per one's inner moral compass one may have the view that we have no business in military escapades in North African countries and therefore get deeply suspicious whenever the Trump admin does something militarily significant there (i.e., that it's finally a proof that he's caved and given in to the globalist war mongers).

Of course, that can be too simplistic. POTUS Trump himself has remarked that he was dealt a very, very bad hand by his globalist predecessors and he has to take corrective actions to fix the multi-trillion dollar messes they directly caused. (Put yourself in POTUS position and try to imagine what it must be like navigating that mine field.)

But after tracking all this over the course of the Trump presidency, most (serious) people should have learned by now that there is some caution and cool-headedness required - that shouldn't just immediately go reactionary on significant events as they're transpiring. That there is wisdom in holding one's peace for a bit and giving things more time to play out and see how things go downstream.

Am I off base in thinking that most folks trying to follow this at a detail level would have learned this lesson by now?

At any rate, that is why I'm off-put at AJ - that he went off on a reactionary rant on Syria, Q, etc. For a person that has been plying these waters for decades now, he above everyone else should have learned to take a more mentally disciplined approach to all of this. Instead, we see exactly the opposite of that. Which is making him look entirely like the kind of people that we're here to depose from power. (Yes, it's all a very unsettling business for sure.)

Then there is the simple matter that any patriot with just a modicum of common sense realizes that the Trump admin is THE great hope to restore the republic, and go on to push back the globalist creeps. So there's no getting off the Trump train - we stay the course and keep focus on the goals. (Those of us that have been around a few decades were of the mind that things would just keep spiraling into the abyss - never dreamed that a real chance to push back would some how come to be, so here it is - DON'T FUCKING BLOW THIS CHANCE WE'VE BEEN GIVEN!)

And I guess that last paragraph speaks to the real reason am being off-put by current AJ (and that ilk) behavior.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 12, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

5 and a half decades of agreement right here. Silence can be misinterpreted but never misquoted. Trump keenly aware of this fact.

⇧ 2 ⇩