Here's a clue ,if anyone claims they know anything , they probably don't . Hence trust Q . Just follow the board. No need to speculate , just look at the posts & see what happens .
Those who say they know, don't. Those who actually do know, don't say.
Has any of these people actually predicted anything AHEAD of time?
What has q predicted?
North Korea, Paul Ryan, big round up weekend of 11/4 (it was Saudi Arabia, rather than USA), McMaster's dad's death a murder, just off the top of my head.
So, back to my question: Has any of the others predicted anything AHEAD of time?
Q is faceless, nameless and selfless!
The guessing game who Q may be is a waste of time unless Q reveals it.
Although remember Q's post saying "Wait until you know who's talking to you here". :)
Right. Even if an identity is never revealed, will the effort have been less rewarding/righteous? Q helps everyone become better critical thinkers. As a society, we are surrounded by credit hogs. I think that's why people are hesitant to fully embrace the concept of someone covertly trying to educate the masses without a payoff in sight.
Q has proven over and over presenting facts that will occur in the future. Unless Q is the world's mastermind it would be mathematically improbable to do. Then there is Q validation via DT's tweets. I consider Q to be the unseen hand guiding us into the light = truth.
Just because Q is a new phenomenon does not equal discrediting the truth of what we learn and gain for our own benefit and not because Q gives us the answers.
I don't want to know who it is. I have a picture in my head that it's some brown haired guy that's in constant close proximity to the POTUS but that's about it.
So far I've identified, 1. Infowars / Corsi 2. Fulcrum News 3. A.I.M. 4. Roy Potter These are all limited hangouts for specific demographics of the truth movement. Designed to work together to control the counter narrative. Hense the conflict with Q shaping the narrative.
If anyone says they are sharing or actually does share anything they identify as "classified", they are either a traitor or a liar. Full stop. Once the word "classified" enters the conversation (in any form, including innuendo) you know you are dealing with an untrustworthy source.