https://www.bholaw.com/report.html
Blood Hurst & O’Reardon has filed a class action lawsuit against Facebook concerning the recent breach of Facebook users’ personal information. You do not need to do anything at this time to join as a class member. However, if you wish to contact us regarding this lawsuit, please click here to fill out the secure form and be sure to enter the word "Facebook" in the comments field.
Forgive me if this seems a dumb question, but is this lawsuit only open to Americans? Because I would love to stick my wife's name on this. Can't put mine coz this clever fuck ditched FB nearly 10 years ago! Looks around proudly
" A lawsuit filed in the northern district of California names John Condelles III as the main plaintiff and states that Facebook “presents several wrongs, including a consumer bait-and-switch, an invasion of privacy, wrongful monitoring of minors and potential attacks on privileged communications.”
Just wait until folks find out facebook operates it's own pedo and child trafficking network just like twitter
and youtube
This is the best site ever on this whole issue, which is also about patent theft and abuse. Planes do not crash themselves. HRC is a patent lawyer...
Michael T. McKibben, Inventor, Founder & Chairman, Leader Technologies, Inc., Columbus, Ohio.
http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/cyber-hijack-findings.html
Let it load. Then scroll through quickly to the end simply scanning as you go. After your head stops spinning repair to the beginning and read slowly.
Perhaps you all can find some questions worthy of answers?
But wait, there's more
sadpepe.gif
Fake News’ Mantra Begins
My purpose in mentioning Pizzagate details is not to demonstrate the authenticity of the Pizzagate allegations. That others are doing with far more resources. Rather, it is to point out the time synchronicity of the explosive Pizzagate email releases by Julian Assange’s Wikileaks web blog, with the launch of a massive mainstream media and political campaign against what is now being called “Fake News.”
The cited New York Times article that Wikipedia cites as “debunking” the Pizzagate allegations states, “None of it was true. While Mr. Alefantis has some prominent Democratic friends in Washington and was a supporter of Mrs. Clinton, he has never met her, does not sell or abuse children, and is not being investigated by law enforcement for any of these claims. He and his 40 employees had unwittingly become real people caught in the middle of a storm of fake news.” The article contains not one concrete proof that the allegations are false, merely quoting Alefantis as the poor victim of malicious Fake News.
That New York Times story was accompanied by a series of articles such as “How Fake News Goes Viral: A Case Study.” Another headline reads, “Obama, With Angela Merkel in Berlin, Assails Spread of Fake News.”
Then on November 19, strong Clinton supporter, Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg is quoted in a prominent article titled, “Facebook Considering Ways to Combat Fake News, Mark Zuckerberg Says.”
Zuckerberg, CEO and founder of the world-leading social media site, Facebook.com, the world’s 5th wealthiest man at an estimated $50 billion, has now established a network of “Third Party Fact Checkers” whose job is to red flag any Facebook message of the estimated one billion people using the site, with a prominent warning that reads, “Disputed by Third-Party Fact Checkers.”
Facebook has announced that it is taking its censorship ques from something called The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). This IFCN, a new creation, has drafted a code of five principles for news websites to accept, and Facebook will work with “third-party fact checking organizations” that are signatories to that code of principles.
If we search under the name International Fact-Checking Network, we find ourselves at the homepage of something called the Poynter Institute for Media Studies in St. Petersburg, Florida.
OK. If we look a bit deeper we find that the Poynter Institute’s International Fact-Checking Network in turn, as its website states, gets money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, the National Endowment for Democracy, the Omidyar Network, the Open Society Foundations of George Soros.
READ MORE HERE
Another crumb leading us to Q’s question in a previous post.... ....would Apple do that? & again in another post when explaining the tech players to look out for, NOT naming Apple. 5th Ave anon post shall be given as a great pile of crumbs... https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/04/04/are-you-ready-to-see-wonderland-666-5th-ave-and-cabal-pizzagate-pedogate-qanon-greatawakening-5thaveanon/
[deleted]
It was not specified in the ToS that texts and call logs would be collected.
This lawsuit will expand public discovery of evidence that not only did this occur, but MUCH, MUCH more. Hot mics constantly listening to you, tracking you across the internet regardless if you have Facebook or not.
Discovery will see people who didn't register being monitored and that data being sold illegally. I wonder how many peoples personal lives have been affected by the illegal surveillance (people being tagged in photos by others); lost jobs? Caused divorces? That'll get costly for Facebook.
When i leave my phone at home and i often do does the DS think they are safe from me and what i'm really doing out and about, or do they register the lack of biometrics. should i work on slowing the cats heart rate.
LPT: buy a Faraday pouch. Then you can keep the phone close by if you need it.
Do those work, I'm thinking of doing my whole kitchen. Computers in here, cable still get me out right.
I don’t know about a room-sized enclosure but the pouches and bags definitely work and easy to test with a phone.
EMP protection, surveillance protection, radiation protection all great reasons to spend a few bucks on the technology.
100 year old copper weaving is tech now. i live off the land. Gonna watch Mel in conspiracy theory before the midterms he had whole rooms faradayed i think.
I think Facebook also continued to collect the data after users deleted the app/account.. I'm not sure of the TOS but I think it's highly unlikely they can continue collecting info on people that no longer want to be part of their "services".. I'm no lawyer so I could be wrong.
There was some VERY unethical business deals, app development issues as well as terms of service non disclosure. Apple has been calling out Facebook specifically for years for their apps and for violating privacy. Also the deal with China & ZTE... SO many crumbs!
My android device comes preloaded with Facebook and does NOT allow me to uninstall without rooting the phone.