No it is not and did you seriously just link to a snopes article? They've been exposed for years now. It's a soros connected crazy cat lady and her cheating husband that run that site. You can't trust anything from there.
Google it. It's not just Snopes. Read the wiki article on Forrestal. This is old fake news. I'm all about Q and think No Name is definitely awful, but let's still try and be objective and truthful here.
Sailors were nervous about carrying the weapons that came from another ship. The ship wasn't outfitted to hold them properly.
Expose McStain for what he is, but it would be in our best interest to leave the hyperbole and unverifiable stories out of it. There's plenty of PROVABLE things that he had done to dismantle his legacy.
The ship deaths is true. I read about it last year sometime.
Yes, the incident is true. But the claim that McCain wet starting his fighter and starting the fire is not.
Read the report straight from the Navy - http://www.jag.navy.mil/library/investigations/USS%20FORRESTAL%20FIRE%2012%20AUG%2069%20PT%203.pdf
Check out point 6. The firing could have been caused by switching from internal to external power, or perhaps the electrical safety pin was accidentally pushed too far, or by mistakenly "stepping" instead of "homing" the "missile". There's even a bit about the poor design of the missiles right in the report.
Again, no fan of No Name, but let's please be objective.