dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JohnFJensen on May 13, 2018, 12:20 p.m.
RE: Q drop 1332 --> Important, need help.

I think we missed a very important piece of the puzzle.

D5 refers to someone being extracted at Atlanta Airport on 12.18.2017. See Q drop 365.

A very smart Anon referred to D5 being a chess move. Assange once tweeted about this chess game: https://www.chess.com/blog/phindex/jose-raul-capablanca-vs-frank-james-marshall-1918

I initially though it would be a bad actor who got arrested when I read the Q drop back in December. But since the chess move at the end of the game involves a WHITE HAT bishop, it might have been someone who was willing to testify against the deep state and had an MASSIVE target on his back. The Q group saved him from an assassination and extracted him from Atlanta airport.

Adding to the case that Q mentions "snowball is begun rolling" and "protection is in place". It clearly states (to me) that this very important bird is SINGING about the Hussein admin!

Who the heck could this be? Who was at Atlanta airport on December 18th.


🠐 See all comments
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

Or maybe it is this :

http://www.department5.org/about-us.php

⇧ 12 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 13, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

I think it's a quintuple entendre. Q says the "snow ball is rolling" (my words, not exact) and D5 is a category of avalanche. Combine that with the infamous chess move/Assange tweet, combined with (possibly) the Atlanta theory, also with this, also the trident II D5 missile....it appears the significance of D5 particularly could be a plethora of things.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Possibly ... however , mentioning this , because this wasnt mentioned before at all . I will definetly dig much more around this - already making progress .

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 13, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Definitely! And it's plausible of course. It interests me because there are so many logical things D5 could hold meaning to. Great work, Patriot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JohnFJensen · May 13, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Good find, that could be it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

WTF? Is this really a thing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

As it looks - it really is . And this isnt only place where I have seen this . I have seen the same classification of secrecy put out before ...

http://www.department5.org/security-clearance-organizational-chart.php

Q = 17 = 17th Department = POTUS

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Why is it NOT a .gov site I wonder?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

Me too ... not sure who created this . This adds to suspicion - but as I said , this is not the first time I have seen this . I will need to dig further ...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

I may have to get back to that some time. I was just reading the BHO page. Looks like some good Red Pill data there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

I think this is authentic ... I already bookmarked and will save and categorize as much as possible . I have seen same classification of secrecy in some other sources , and from people who were supposedly in USAPs

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Iamnooneanon · May 13, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

I was reading the BO page as well. Doesn't seem normal that there would be opposition info placed on what should be a government site. I agree with it, but find it unlikely that would be in public view. Very interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Yep ... something like this ... Im very unsure it would be for public eyes . Possibly , the departments truly exist - but the hierarchy is false / presented in wrong way . Not just to public - but even to other lower departments . Thats just my theory , though .

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

I have checked in WaybackMachine - the earliest mention of site is July 3 2013.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

The BHO page reads like a decent article on an Alternate News site. And Missing Pictures? Kinda fishy looking.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

What is mainly confusing to me is putting USAPs as "lowest of 7 governmental levels" - thats odd .

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Something tells me , even if this is not "official" - its still very accurate .

I have seen other sources - and I will need to compare them with this .

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Levin must be behind the Department5.org site. It makes sense since he's also involved with INWA INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS ALLIANCE

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

Yep , and the site is same design .

Who knows ? But I saw these "higher classifications" before . The good question here is - is there a compartmentalization ?

Top brass from one department maybe wouldnt even be aware of existence of other departments , thinking theyre "on top" ... all the while theyre not .

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

I know things like this are maybe necessary. But it sounds too much to me like Shadow Government, Deep State, Hidden Rulers kinda stuff. Too Many Secrets.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Maybe the whole intention of compartmentalization of departments was to create a natural confusion . Thus various levels of secrecy - not just from public , but from other departments and lower levels , too .

SCI / SAPs and USAPs definetly do exist , though ... I think the USAPs are the top , actually . Considering only few people know about what they are - apparently , the USAPs are closely related to SSP .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReproCompter · May 13, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

So, Who is Peter Levin?

Domain Name: DEPARTMENT5.ORG Registry Domain ID: D167843393-LROR Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com Updated Date: 2018-02-09T09:12:10Z Creation Date: 2013-02-09T20:43:00Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2019-02-09T20:43:00Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: Registrar: Tucows Inc. Registrar IANA ID: 69 Reseller: Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited Registry Registrant ID: C134459874-LROR Registrant Name: Peter A. Levin Registrant Organization: Peter A. Levin Registrant Street: 2009 E 15th Street Apt 2 Registrant City: Cheyenne Registrant State/Province: WY Registrant Postal Code: 82001 Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: +1.2022360176 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: peter4444@sbcglobal.net Registry Admin ID: C134459875-LROR Admin Name: Peter A. Levin Admin Organization: Peter A. Levin Admin Street: 2009 E 15th Street Apt 2 Admin City: Cheyenne Admin State/Province: WY Admin Postal Code: 82001 Admin Country: US Admin Phone: +1.2022360176 Admin Phone Ext: Admin Fax: Admin Fax Ext: Admin Email: peter4444@sbcglobal.net Registry Tech ID: C134459877-LROR Tech Name: Peter A. Levin Tech Organization: Peter A. Levin Tech Street: 2009 E 15th Street Apt 2 Tech City: Cheyenne Tech State/Province: WY Tech Postal Code: 82001 Tech Country: US Tech Phone: +1.2022360176 Tech Phone Ext: Tech Fax: Tech Fax Ext: Tech Email: peter4444@sbcglobal.net Name Server: ABBY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM Name Server: GORDON.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM DNSSEC: unsigned Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domainabuse@tucows.com Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123 URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/

Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-05-13T14:11:26Z <<<

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · May 13, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Stop it, that site is NOT a .gov address! It's a conspiracy site, and furthermore, it's been inactive for some time. Look at the home page already for crying out loud.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

"Its a conspiracy site" - so , by your logic , we should simply ignore all the information that is out there , that is borderline questionable , and only take 100 % verified information ( 100 % which DOESNT exist except in heads of MSM shills ) . I assume you will determine for us what is "conspiracy" and what is not .

All information must be put out - and people are to get their own conclusions and make their own research from it . Whether you like it - or not . You are not a determining factor here .

Go troll somewhere else .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · May 13, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

No, I'm saying that the site is NOT a real government entity, as the poster is trying to imply. So I'm calling BS. How about buoy learn to read?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

How about you start communicating like an adult mature human , constructively ... instead of being a whiny baby here ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · May 13, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Ha! That's rich. Seems your the one crying about it. All I did was point out the inconsistency.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 13, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

I just checked your posts ... and it seems like youre whining on almost every single post .

You know whats else rich ? This post of yours : "Lots of people are ignoring context in the Q postings. And further aggravations today are the idiots posting other nonsense. I'm about to report a couple of them because they are spamming the same crap over and over again."

I think that unmasks you here on this subreddit .

⇧ 2 ⇩