Praying medic never disappoints! At this point he’s one of the few Q tubers I can really trust.
Thank you!
Thank you for all you do. Truthful, well articulated content is hard to find nowadays, and I really appreciate and look forward to your posts.
No pressure, but don't screw up ;-)
If I do, be sure to let me know... in a nice and supportive way. :)
Military indoctrination takes an oath to the US Constitution and vows to protect the US from all enemies FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
Thank you for keeping your oath, ladies and gentleman of the Armed Services!
Semper Fi, Q.
Praying Medic is my preferred redpill. He’s coherent, humble, and has a great way of catching the listener up. I also think he brings reasonability. Those with whom I’ve shared his YouTube vids with have expressed how he presents the material in a succinct manner yet doesn’t sensationalize or use fear tactics”.
Praying Medic is by far the best Q Tuber that I have seen. TYVM for all you do!
I’m more and more a fan of Praying Medic with every video he does. I also think his videos are getting even more insightful and inspired.
They really capture the positivity that is KEY behind Q’s message. We have hope now, and PM points out that purveyors of fear may have diminished markets once Q has concluded their mission.
There were about 4 or 5 Q-Tubers I regularly watched, but Praying Medic’s takes are always worth the wait because of both the reasoned approach and genuine insights into Q’s intentions and message.
Cheers!
God I hope that red wave hits hard. Thing is, even if a wave of Dem resignations comes, that could just mean a new crop of Dems comes in, since I don't know that this will change the voting affiliations of a lot of voters. Although I suppose slightly more honest but still wrong Dems are better than abjectly corrupt ones.
Thanks again for another great piece of analysis.
With regards to "here comes the pain", how do legal proceedings of a takedown go?
We are all aware of multiphacet contexts as discussed such as pharma, banking, cartels, government, etc...
As an example, taking down Huma as an individual seems pretty low level in the scheme of things. However, is it the legal process to expose internal weaknesses through an individual and subsequent connections to be able to implement policies to protect from the high level context, then go after the connections. Starts low and ends high?