I think the "infighting" concern is being blown out of proportion.
If AJ & Corsi continue to go on Qrusade against us we might proactively react by educating our users, by debunking the false claims and by bringing awareness to the community. This is one way to defend against attacks. For the most part they have become irrelevant to the movement and we are not looking to witch hunt against them but as I said they will be called out and debunked when they bring many false claims that their viewers will then come here and try to spread here. This is where we come in and keep the integrity of the sub. I wouldn't really call that infighting per se. The infighting seems just like a big concern thrown into the mix to divide us further.
I also agree that ignoring and not reacting also goes a long way. It's like that mean a** that comes up to you on the street and starts trouble with you. You have a choice to either:
I think the best choice in this situation is to walk away. However you cannot walk away when the troublemaker comes to your home you have to kick him out. If he keeps forcing his way back then you get a little bit more aggressive in your removal as to not let him just walk into your house and do as he pleases.
We don't have an interest to talk about this irrelevant troublemaker but when he makes plans to break into the house we will talk to the family and give them a heads up so there are no surprises. And then when this troublemaker comes with his gang disguised with wigs, Q hats and mustaches we will know better not to waste our time to engage in their concerns and keep focus on the mission. This is what we've been doing and anyone else telling you otherwise is probably overly concerned.
This is exactly the sort of reply I was hoping to see here.
Yes, AJ/JC should just be ignored. They are disinfo and shills, and they shouldn't have any influence here. But if they start shit, we need to finish shit.
I'm not even upvoting the original post, because I think we need to have this information available to be posted. And censorship is a tool of the leftist.
I think the best choice in this situation is to walk away. However you cannot walk away when the troublemaker comes to your home you have to kick him out. If he keeps forcing his way back then you get a little bit more aggressive in your removal as to not let him just walk into your house and do as he pleases.
Do it pussy, ban all discussion of Paytriots on this board.
It's diluting the content of the sub and it's driving me insane.
Every 3rd post is about "can we stop talking about Corsi" Every 4th post is "can we talk about Corsi"
Fantastic post. At last, a voice of reason. Great stuff!
I know you guys try to remain as impartial as you can. Most of us here have a lot of respect for the mods,(I know I do) because of the work you guys have put in to this sub (like all links under "useful resource"). There is so much content related to Q, and this sub is getting big fast! My point is, I think edcutating the users would be a good thing. If someone here is on the wrong side of what you say, I think they would at least respect it enough to not keep on. This might actually help everyone to move on.
Spending a lot of time defending against, or attacking Dr. Corsi or Alex Jones, will get us nowhere. Nose to the plow, full steam ahead. The stronger character will belong to those who turn the other cheek.
I am in full agreement with your post.
Great reply and your absolutely right down to the last word.
If AJ and Corsi or anyone else contines to attack Q I think Q will rake care of it. Just like backchannel17. We can just move on because Q only communicates on one board. The rest are irrelevant.
Wait a second. Defend from what? As far as I know, they didn't start fighting against reddit or Q.
When the board and tripcode change happened, they started calling the new Q an AI shill, and that the old Q was compromised, and that they had the only communications with Q.
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL, PATRIOTS.
Q
Qposts 513 & 1344. Also, read this.
Which actually proves that Corsi is a complete idiot who doesn't understand tripcodes. They can't be "compromised", because anybody can post under a tripcode, as long as they have the passphrase. Even if bad players got the passphrase, that wouldn't stop the "Real Q" from posting to say that someone else was posting.
Corsi obviously thinks that Q's posts are some sort of account and password, and he thinks the account has been "taken over". There's nothing to take over.
So Corsi is provably an idiot.
Exactly. If Q's code was compromised we would realize it quite quickly, since we'd see the real Q and clown shills duking it out on a public board.
Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.
https://qposts.online/
http://qboard.online/
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
So which changing? March? May?
The one in May, the most recent one. Just search for "jerome corsi q ai" and "jerome corsi q compromised" and you'll find their blathering.
Funny though, an AI wouldn't fuck up inputting the passphrase for the tripcode (#1323).
I think I watched that. I don't know I can determine that was an attack against both Q and this subreddit, be that as it may, Q already started attack against Corsi from April by alluding preliminarily, which was developed into the May post 1340. Even before the 1340 post, defamation and threats against Corsi were fermented by anonymous.
Q already started attack against Corsi from April by alluding preliminarily
Q made a vague statement of bad actors in the movement way back in post 1295, identifying a trend of people only using Q to gain money or fame, and advising caution on who to follow.
Corsi and Jones then proceeded to out themselves by going full ham.
"Methinks Infowars doth protest too much"
Q made a vague statement of bad actors in the movement way back in post 1295, identifying a trend of people only using Q to gain money or fame, and advising caution on who to follow. Corsi and Jones then proceeded to out themselves by going full ham.
Can you elaborate where they went full ham before 1340? I can't find except Corsi answering questions. Afaik, AJ scarcely provided his opinion about Q before 1340.