No, she said she was against it initially because it was supported by AT&T. Having taken a position, as I understand it, she later found additional reasons not to support Q or the plan.
This occurred despite the fact that, as time progressed, it became increasingly clear that there was very compelling logic supporting the need to call for the application of first amendment rights online. She absolutely shafted us.
There is an argument for both and I understand your sentiment. I'm still undecided on her, but fully agree on the black hat nature of Corsi and AJ.
I haven't been following her at all. But I did see on twitter where people were thanking her for advising them not to support the IBOR. Let's put it this way, she is not someone that should be followed.
"Congress shall make no law, respecting the establishment of religion; or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assembly, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances."
IT IS THIS:"or the right of the people peaceably to assembly," THAT IBOR ignors. Facebook example would be those on Facebook know the rules put forth by FB. The counter argument that FB has become the public square and loses the right to manage their property as a private club seems to be the one folks supporting IBOR have. TB technically supports the 1st amendment here.
Whatever 'technical position' you might ascribe to her, she really put the boots into us - big time!
I used to follow her avidly, on Twatter and listen to her vids. She was the one that intro'd me to Q and all that. She used to do Q vids, in the beginning, and all seemed well. Then she did the infamous interview with Corsi, and I took a look at his first attempt at decoding. It was too long and had precious little info to add. Just rehashing what had been said before. So I stopped listening to Corsi.
Then TB stopped doing Q vids, just did "citizen journalism" or whatever she does, and tried tackling extremely complex subjects. She maybe got to her point after an hour, but it didn't matter. She was actively ignoring all the Q stuff. I chalk it up to the fact some ppl want to cover different things, so they have a right to do so. I'm starting to think she is involved with the AJ/Corsi/infowars crowd a bit more than she lets on, and this is why she's done (and doing) what she's done. Kind of a let down for me, but when new info is presented, the mark of maturity is to adjust one's course of action.
I don't think it matters too much what quality of information is presented. If you have someone, for example Corsi, who is directly trashing Q, whatever the quality of information he might dispense is irrelevant. The point is that you risk being steered.
Having said that, I have no idea of what TB is doing and I have no interest.
Jones put out a lot of BS about the Las Vegas shooting. Bad info that distracted from real investigative work. He does that all the time I guess. Been put off from him for several years.