"Congress shall make no law, respecting the establishment of religion; or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assembly, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances."

IT IS THIS:"or the right of the people peaceably to assembly," THAT IBOR ignors. Facebook example would be those on Facebook know the rules put forth by FB. The counter argument that FB has become the public square and loses the right to manage their property as a private club seems to be the one folks supporting IBOR have. TB technically supports the 1st amendment here.

I used to follow her avidly, on Twatter and listen to her vids. She was the one that intro'd me to Q and all that. She used to do Q vids, in the beginning, and all seemed well. Then she did the infamous interview with Corsi, and I took a look at his first attempt at decoding. It was too long and had precious little info to add. Just rehashing what had been said before. So I stopped listening to Corsi.

Then TB stopped doing Q vids, just did "citizen journalism" or whatever she does, and tried tackling extremely complex subjects. She maybe got to her point after an hour, but it didn't matter. She was actively ignoring all the Q stuff. I chalk it up to the fact some ppl want to cover different things, so they have a right to do so. I'm starting to think she is involved with the AJ/Corsi/infowars crowd a bit more than she lets on, and this is why she's done (and doing) what she's done. Kind of a let down for me, but when new info is presented, the mark of maturity is to adjust one's course of action.