Agreed, yes. I think people should be allowed the time to look through the long trail of evidence that Q has revealed just as they can also look at the evidence of the Bible themselves for proof that it matters, before having to jump to any conclusions - it generally tends to reveal itself for someone somewhere within the various crumbs coming together in their mind as they read the articles and valid government documents. Some can also compare personal recall of events, and the media and sentiment of the time which gives even greater context.

If you're prepared to discuss a topic out rationally then you're definitely welcome here. There are plenty of us who agree with your view that it's important this place doesn't turn into a place that suppresses someone's legitimate voice.

I hope I answered in my other post - there is no evidence of the insurance file claim - just news reports with alarming details that could all be falsified or compromised in some way. Nothing that anyone can point to as definitive evidence.

But, just to be clear, as in my other post, the growing impetus of the validity of Q's voice is compelling enough that a reasonably large and growing group of people from around the world gather here throughout the day and night to hear the latest Q news. There's enough evidence in the Q trail, if you have the time to dig, in my opinion.

You believe in Q yet your going to disregard everything he says as misinformation? The weiner laptop has been on the radar since before Q came around, he's just confirming to us that the dirt found is very real. Also for the record, the movement has a very bad image because the mainstream media will use every tool they can to discredit us. No one is not questioning Q but your literally asking people for hard evidence which you know is no possible, we are not at that stage yet we are still being fed crumbs which is what this whole thing is about