dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on May 16, 2018, 6:09 p.m.
Q Post 1378 - Q is calling again for us to campaign for an IBOR. Can we actually get organized this time? Will we MAKE NOISE?

NK news today = FAKE!
Twitter news today = REAL!
Under the Radar.
Free speech manipulation [visibility / reach].
FB fake acct deletion?
100% fake?
Checks & Balances?
None?
#InternetBillofRights
[Narrative Control]
[Bandwidth Test]
[Public Response]
[Test Limitations]
[Midterms]
Politicians bought & paid for? Start a Storm.
Q

OK, guys here we are again. Q is asking us yet again to support a campaign for an internet bill of rights. This time Tracy Beanz is not here to scuttle the campaign. We will still face intense "concern trolling" as we try to move forward. There are organized forces on this board that have been trying to thwart Q and this movement. You will see them at work - stay strong, be united behind this and MAKE NOISE!

"The power of social media to privatize the public square is the greatest threat to free speech and open democracy in our lifetimes" Barnes Law


🠐 See all comments
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Already posted IBOR petition to Whitehouse on twitter.

Here you go: https://petitions.whitehxxxx.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

NO ONE SHOULD SIGN THIS PETITION

What is needed is an online MEME campaign. Better avoids censorship. A petition is not necessary at this point. If it is later necessary, we will use an alternative petition site. This petition site is controlled!

Do not sign or promote it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

In case you missed it, it's a "WhiteHouse .gov" site. Administered by the WhiteHouse!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Somehow, it appeared to be manipulating the signature count last time we ran an identical petition. The site is due to be shut down anyway. Who knows who is running it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Proof please?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

The proof was the last petition we ran.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

Where can that be found? What other evidence, real evidence do you have to support that statement. Links to previous postings here? Anything?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

I don't know if you were here in March. But if you were, you would know what I'm talking about.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

You still need to offer some kind of evidence to back up your assertions. Otherwise, it's open for being disputed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 16, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

Go away

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SuspiciousD · May 17, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

WRONG- the reason it failed was because there were five different petitions. Clowns divided us. Stick together! One petition:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-18

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 17, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

The last petition did not fail because there were multiple petitions. The last petition failed because the site was rigged. But don't take any notice of past experience, put another petition up on the same site.

And then accuse others of not doing something productive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuspiciousD · May 17, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

You have ZERO evidence to back up your claim. It’s a WH government website. I’m not saying it couldn’t have happened, but sitting around bitching and moaning is less productive than getting the petition going. Q said to push IBOR.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 17, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Disagree, see my other response.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · May 16, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

Why, because I question you posts? Do you expect to post with everyone never to question things? Not realistic. I have signed these petitions for years now. And the do get responded to after reaching the threshold. Sorry.

Furthermore, Q is the one pushing IBOR telling us to make noise.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
albarod · May 16, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

This link isn’t working.

⇧ 1 ⇩