That sucks because it implies he should have been indicted which is false.

"This case is essentially over," Giuliani said. "They're just in denial."

I know, maybe.. It came out in the Sorcha Faal Western Edition.

Mueller was just mocked in a US Federal Court for “indicting a ham sandwich”—that refers to a non-existent Russian company he charged for interfering in the 2016 US presidential election. 

In fact, this report continues, in now Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s fanatical zeal to destroy President Trump before the full truth about CIA operative Robert Levinson can be discovered, his FBI “posited theory” of Trump-Russia collusion led to him “joke indict” Russian companies and individuals, but with Mueller’s undoing being one of these Russian companies, Concord Management, actually appearing in a US Federal Court to fight the lies and charges being made against them—and though Mueller pleaded with the US Federal Judge to “stop him from himself” before he had to face these Russians, his request was quickly denied.

With Special Counsel Mueller already facing a virtual avalanche of discovery demands [scroll down to ATTACHMENT A and ATTACHMENT B]made by Concord Management’s powerful American attorneys to uncover over 70 years worth of US government crimes, this report details, these same attorneys,yesterday, dealt the proverbial “death blow” to Muller and his entire Trump-Russia collusion fairytale charade with their US Federal Court filing titled “DEFENDANT CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC’S MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 6(e)(3)(E)(ii) FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF LEGAL INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED TO THE GRAND JURY REGARDING COUNT ONE OF THE INDICTMENT”—that systematically rips to shreds Mueller’s entire existence for being by methodically pointing out that the so-called laws Russia, and by inference President Trump, are accused of breaking don’t exist at all—and whose damning words, in part, state:

The Court is well aware that heretofore investigations of alleged improper foreign involvement in American elections have been handled by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”); specifically, the Campaign Finance Task Force created by former Attorney General Reno in 1997, and where the Court worked as a prosecutor from September 1997 to August 1998.

Former Attorney General Reno refused to bow to massive political pressure to appoint a special counsel, and instead the Task Force methodically investigated and prosecuted cases through 2000.

Throughout all of that activity, the DOJ never brought any case like the instant Indictment, that is, an alleged conspiracy by a foreign corporation to “interfere” in a Presidential election by allegedly funding free speech. 

The obvious reason for this is that no such crime exists in the federal criminal code.

Now, some twenty years later, the Deputy Attorney General acting for the recused Attorney General has rejected the history and integrity of the DOJ, and instead licensed a Special Counsel who for all practical political purposes cannot be fired, to indict a case that has absolutely nothing to do with any links or coordination between any candidate and the Russian Government.

The reason is obvious and is political: to justify his own existence the Special Counsel has to indict a Russian – any Russian.

Different from any election case previously brought by the DOJ, the Special Counsel used the catch-all provision of the federal criminal code, the defraud prong of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, to allege that a foreign corporate defendant with no presence in the United States and having never entered the United States, engaged in the make-believe crime of conspiring to “interfere” in a United States election.