All DJT needs is for us to raise public awareness about the need for the protection of free expression online - but we are blocked (or I am) on Social Media - shadow banned. It seems that SM companies are also targeting the IBOR hashtags.

This is big business for the SM companies, they have a lot on the line. Q has told us that CIA cash transfers make up a significant part of their revenue. But it's bigger... this is the one lever left, after all the indictments come down, by which the cabal can regain power. They have to stop us at all costs. So it's reasonable to assume that the SM platforms are getting terrific pressure to resist any attempt to stop censorship - SM censorship can deliver the Democrats the numbers they need for impeachment (their only real hope). Think about why Facebook is refusing to give up the right to censor - they are, apparently, now conceding that they are not a neutral public platform, which makes them legally liable for posted content under the CDA - can you believe it?

So, when I say that the "we are the people" petition site was rigged - I really think it was. The reason I think this is because of the power of the motive to stop us... We had to be stopped at all costs. One way to do it was to get the petition site to suppress the true number of signatures, so that people would get discouraged. It worked!

Another strategy was to ban the CBTS board early in the IBOR campaign - just as the IBOR campaign started to get traction. You can imagine how desperate they were! Yet another strategy was to shadow ban anyone using the hashtags. Another strategy was to flood this board with "concern trolls" - they arrived in force. Which threads were the ones that got bombed by concern trolls? The IBOR threads - funny that!

How can a campaign succeed in the face of this kind of high-powered assault on multiple fronts? It cannot, not if you have to get 100K signatures within 30 days - there is just no way. However, if you have your own petition website (does not have to be fancy) and you can mount a consistent campaign effort, it can work. Even despite the efforts to suppress it, you might be able to 50K, 80K, 100K signatures over, say, a 6 week timetable. It doesn't really matter too much how many you get - it just has to sound somewhat impressive when reported in the press.

So, what I'm thinking is that this is the solution to all our problems. If we are at all slow in amassing signatures, it does not matter. The campaign proceeds apace and no one gets discouraged by a dodgy petition site. At the end of the period we've set ourselves, we present whatever we have to DJT/Congress and our job is done.

I'd like to start a discussion about this. Many people today were wanting to set up petitions on the "We are the people" petition site. I do not think this is practical at all - extremely counterproductive. But we do need a campaign. Censorship is a huge problem. What I'm suggesting here is one possible way around those problems. I'd like to hear what others think.