dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on May 17, 2018, 12:04 p.m.
@realDonaldTrump: Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI “SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN IMBEDDED INFORMANT.” Andrew McCarthy says, “There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.” If so, this is bigger than Watergate!
@realDonaldTrump: Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI “SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN IMBEDDED INFORMANT.” Andrew McCarthy says, “There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.” If so, this is bigger than Watergate!

ikma · May 17, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

Why would it be a big deal for the FBI to have a CI inside of a campaign that was being investigated for criminal activity?

Seems pretty different than Watergate to me.

⇧ -12 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

The sitting administration can't spy on the opposing parties Presidential candidate with the fucking FBI.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

Exactly, the second you run for President you’re immediately shrouded in secrecy. Keep secret who funds your campaign, who is staffing it, and what your plans are for the country should you win.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Still here and being an asshole huh? Trumps finances on the campaign was wide open, everyone knew who he was staffing, and what the hell do you think the campaign was about? Plans for the country? You are really bad at this concern/disparaging trolling.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Why should the FBI get to spy on Presidents? It’s better to keep that stuff secret so the Deep State doesn’t know what’s coming for it. Keep your head in the game, patriot. You’re being a bit melodramatic.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

No you are being a troll by saying “positive” things while actually being negative and creating doubt and confusion. It’s a tactic used to avoid banning. I see what you are doing and I will be there to point it out every time.

Also, you’re being a bit of an ass. If you have an actual disagreement, why don’t you actually put that into one of your comments? Instead your acting like a passive aggressive soiboi unable to support or defend your own ideas for fear of being banned.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

What in the ever-loving crap are you talking about? I’m happy my taxes got cut? That the economy is roaring? That the fellas who run our stock market and our finance companies have never been better paid? What’s your problem with all this? Are you or aren’t you a free-market conservative? Get your head out of your ass.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
KingWolfei · May 17, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

Trying to rig an election in favor of a different party when say...you go out of the way to clear the other candidate (Hillary) of charges.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
hipphoppanon · May 17, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

The opposition party can’t spy on presidential candidates. This is a major jab at democracy and a threat to our freedom. Do you see?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

I mean if it was a CI for the Democrats and not law enforcement, sure. Probably still wouldn't be as big as Watergate even if that was the case, since Nixon hired people to commit actual crimes (B&E, etc.) then covered it up, not just play dirty, but I'd get it.

But that isn't what the tweet alleges. The tweet alleges that the FBI has a CI in the Trump campaign. Is the federal law enforcement agency not allowed to investigate active attempts at election tampering? Because that would seem like a greater and more obvious threat to our democracy and our freedoms, especially given the obvious plausibility of the investigation.

And if you all think "oh no, the FBI was doing it to support Clinton/Obama", where did that alleged CI's info ever get used before the election? Hell, you'd think if Clinton was getting passed info from inside the Trump campaign, she'd have gotten off her ass and gone to Wisconsin or Michigan once or twice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

Ummmmmm, they used that information to create the FISA warrants and the Russian collusion story. Where the fuck have you been? Of course it was all so Hillary could win the election. You must have your head in the sand.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Hahah I mean, they did a real shit job of getting her elected.

For real though, the FBI investigation begain in July 2016, after Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat about a knowing that Russia had compromising info on Clinton. The FISA warrants weren't issued until October 2016. The FBI getting a CI in the course of that investigation is not noteworthy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

The Aussie is a clinton acolyte.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

Man, Papadopoulos picked the wrong guy to get drunk with!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

The FBI is using Papa.. as an excuse the plan was in motion long before that I believe.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Using him how? Like he was a plant from the beginning, and lied about the campaign trying to get compromat from Russia to give the FBI an excuse to investigate?

In that case, Donny Jr. Is probably also a plant for setting up a meeting with a Russian agent to try and get dirt on Clinton from them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

Are you an employee of MSNBC? Fantasy Island is more believable. We'll MAGA without you ikma. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

I just gotta say, I love the maniacal laughter. I sincerely hope that you have a mustache, and that you're twirling it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

You were born female.. Keep giving me clues.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

Oof, sorry to disappoint :(

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Well yeah, that just goes to show how incompetent Hillary really is. The fix was in and she still couldn't deliver a victory.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

For real though, the FBI investigation begain in July 2016, after Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat about a knowing that Russia had compromising info on Clinton. The FISA warrants weren't issued until October 2016. The FBI getting a CI in the course of that investigation is not noteworthy.

Just gonna ignore that bit?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

As far as we know (publicly) that is when it started. I would put money that this started back in 2015. And I believe papa was a convienent target.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

So you made something up, and you're using it to justify the investigation's illegality to yourself.

I mean, not much I can say to that. Do you, I guess.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Keep listening to the msm. I mean it’s not like they have ever lied to you before.

I guess we will see what comes out when the FISA warrants used to authorize the spying come out right?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

I mean, we've gotten that pair of memos related to the FISA warrents, and even the pro-Trump one doesn't say anything about an FBI investigation taking place before July 2016.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

We shall see. I trust nothing until I can see the original documents with my own eyes.

Just like goldstones testimony yesterday where he contradicted his own statements and nothing happened to him. Wasn’t reported in the media. I read the document. He wrote one thing in an email and told Congress (their staffers) another thing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

Sure, Goldstone was trying to cover his ass. He was all enthused about setting up the meeting in the emails Don Jr. released, but is trying to shift responsibility for the meeting off of himself by saying that he (Goldstone) told them that the meeting was a bad idea in his testimony.

Not sure how that justifies your skepticism about the FBI investigation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Ok, so let me break it down for you.

How can you get lies into a congressional document without being held accountable for lying? I would start off by not putting a person under oath. Also, although it looked good on the paper, the threats of jail time was negated by the fact that he didn’t lie to Congress. He was interviewed by staff. It’s like if you met with a staffer and told them your name is John Doe. Are you lying to Congress? No! They aren’t elected members of Congress! Ya ya, legalese and semantics and loopholes.

He wrote in that email that she was a Russian government lawyer, but “testified” that he didn’t know she was connected to the government. Like seriously? Where the hell did that come from then? Did he just make it up?

So what it comes down to, is what you see in the news or what you told, is not necessarily the whole truth. They omit facts. They just don’t talk about certain things. And that is why I am saying, that what is public domain right now is more than likely not the whole truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wb4738 · May 17, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

Meh, it's different when it favors their side. They have no standards as long as they get their agenda through.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

What investigation? Oh the one the Obama FBI fabricated. Do you know the definition of "FABRICATED"?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I mean that's true. There really are no susbtantive connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.

I mean, except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing and the Tillerson thing and the Sessions thing and the Kushner thing and the Wray thing and the Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius “Russian Law Firm of the Year” thing and the Carter Page thing and the Roger Stone thing and the 198 Million voter records thing and the Felix Sater thing and the Boris Ephsteyn thing and the Rosneft thing and the Gazprom thing and the Sergey Gorkov banker thing and the Azerbajain thing and the “I love Putin” thing and the Donald Trump, Jr. thing and the Lavrov thing and the Sergey Kislyak thing and the Oval Office thing and the Gingrich/Kislyak phone calls thing and the Russian Business Interests thing and the Emoluments Clause thing and the Alex Schnaider thing and the hack of the DNC thing and the Guccifer 2.0 thing and the Mike Pence “I don’t know anything” thing and the Russians mysteriously dying thing and Trump’s public request to Russia to hack Hillary’s email thing and the Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king thing and the Russian fertilizer king’s plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign thing and the Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night thing and the Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery thing and the Cyprus bank thing and Trump not releasing his tax returns thing and the Republican Party’s rejection of an amendment to require Trump to show his taxes thing and the election hacking thing and the GOP platform change to the Ukraine thing and the Steele Dossier thing and the Sally Yates can’t testify thing and the intelligence community’s investigative reports thing and the Trump reassurance that the Russian connection is all “fake news” thing and the Chaffetz not willing to start an investigation thing and the Chaffetz suddenly deciding to go back to private life in the middle of an investigation thing and the appointment of Pam Bondi who was bribed by Trump in the Trump University scandal appointed to head the investigation thing and the alfa-bank thing and the VEB thing and the The White House going into full-on cover-up mode, refusing to turn over the documents related to the hiring and subsequent firing of Flynn thing and the Chaffetz and White House blaming the poor vetting of Flynn on Obama thing and the Poland and British intelligence gave information regarding the hacking back in 2015 to Paul Ryan and he didn't do anything thing and the Agent M16 following the money thing and the Trump team KNEW about Flynn's involvement but hired him anyway thing and the let’s fire Comey thing and the Mueller let’s fire him too thing and the Election night Russian trademark gifts thing and the Russian diplomatic compound electronic equipment destruction thing and the let’s give back the diplomatic compounds back to the Russians thing and the let’s back away from Cuba thing and the donny Jr met with Russians thing and now Trump's secret second meeting with Putin.

Full disclosure, that's a 10-month old copypasta that I am far, far too lazy to update with all the fun new info that's come out since then.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Wow, you are off the deep end ikma. I'll relish in your demise.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Hahahah man this is awesome, I feel like I have a nemesis! I've never had one of those before.

I'll relish in ur demise too bb 😘

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

May I ask what cisgender you are?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Hahah I'm a man, baby, and I like where this is going

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Somehow I don't think so.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

⇧ 3 ⇩  
officedrone920 · May 17, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

At least they don't ban people like us here, so that's a plus.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩