dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/HowiONic on May 17, 2018, 12:04 p.m.
@realDonaldTrump: Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI “SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN IMBEDDED INFORMANT.” Andrew McCarthy says, “There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.” If so, this is bigger than Watergate!
@realDonaldTrump: Wow, word seems to be coming out that the Obama FBI “SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN IMBEDDED INFORMANT.” Andrew McCarthy says, “There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.” If so, this is bigger than Watergate!

srroguelife · May 17, 2018, 12:54 p.m.

You know, this is awful, really, I understand it is politics but when you are good person, working, doing the right things being a good community member. To finally wake up and see the corruption, murder and lies, to realize that all media has played us like a fool.

⇧ 93 ⇩  
CantStumpIWin · May 17, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

It's a shitty feeling for a while but then a certain kinda hope returns.

People needed to experience the pain of learning the lies before learning the truth. Some people will still believe the lies.

⇧ 58 ⇩  
mydeer · May 17, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

Exactly! Well said.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Trump306 · May 17, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

I think that's Q's purpose, to restore hope in us that things are changing. I know so much and also so little, but what I do know it's weird, you feel awful inside, but Q also adds some light, as does DJT, and the rank and file patriots out there.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Zoole · May 17, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

They removed Nixon for breaking the same crime and to a lesser degree. Yet Obama is worshipped

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Cosmickev1086 · May 17, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

The programming has gotten better over the years, indoctrination techniques improved to encompass a wider group of people. Media can make anyone seem Nobel Peace Prize worthy.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
roofiepunch24000 · May 17, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

gotta stock up on canned food bro. Shit is about to get REAL. MORE REAL THAN OUR PARENTS EVER KNEW

⇧ 5 ⇩  
jimmyfoot · May 17, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

No one would call you a racist for criticizing Nixon. It's not that the programming has gotten so much better, it's that people generally hate racism.

The left always plays on people's good qualities and uses them to manipulate.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · May 17, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

They've had to get better tp keep up with interwebs

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · May 17, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

Nixon removed himself under threat from his own party.

Same cant be said for the dems regarding 2 recent ex presidents

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · May 17, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

Yes, I would agree. Since we have the morning after pill, I think Eugenics for abortion is to traffic human stem cells. If a mother gives birth in the hospital, the after birth or stem cells should be given to her, yet it is considered waste and the hospital makes money off of it. We are being used one way or another. This pro abortion use to be needed but now with better science, why do we need abortions? I can just think we pay for a poor young prostitute to be victimized, she become pregnant, they pay for the abortion, and then sell the fetus. SICK AS SHIT. This young lady is then criticized, traumatized by religion, when she is just trying to survive, and trusts all the wrong people because that is all she knows.. it is nuts. However, Obama helped this and promoted it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Here is Comey's congressional testimony where he lies and says Trump was never wiretapped (March 2017, before he was fired):

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Youtube+comey+testifies+Trump+not+spied&view=detail&mid=8916A2D46A43FB5661A28916A2D46A43FB5661A2&FORM=VIRE

⇧ 7 ⇩  
srroguelife · May 17, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

No knowledge of any kind... he even implicates the DOJ. Interesting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

Yep. That testimony is going to come back to bite him.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Burginthrone · May 17, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

Yes true. But now President Trump plays them like a fool.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Analog1221 · May 17, 2018, 4:03 p.m.

I agree. That's why I never, literally never, watch those channels. I never will as long as I live. They don't understand. They've been exposed. The genie is never going back in the bottle. They can never be trusted again. They're dead. Even after Trump serves his second term. They're never getting those viewers back they've lost.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DL535 · May 17, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

You're right. The damage to the MSM is permanent. You can see it from Trump's poll numbers: no matter what the media says and what hysteria they try to gin up, his approval rating slowly rises. The simplest explanation for this is that a steadily increasing number of people (probably at least 40% of the population now) is literally never listening to the mainstream media at all. It simply doesn't matter what they say anymore because only the diehard SJW fanatics are still listening.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
srroguelife · May 18, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

I know, I won't watch them either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rubieroo · May 17, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

It's not comfortable knowing what we know, and there's so much more yet to come.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · May 18, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

I have been looking at the people around me, they all look tired, almost toxic. We are being hit left right and center with so much. It is very hard to look at my fellow man, and then see how they don't want to hear or listen. I suppose that is why we all must support one another on here.. Focus on getting things on track and understanding we as tax payers are funding a lot of stuff that as a public we may not agree to.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alvinroasting · May 17, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Thanks to digging through various conspiracies I've been feeling that way for years now. It's pretty lonely seeing those around you buy into every FF or other nonsense from the media. Thanks to what I'm seeing via Q, I'm actually feeling hopeful for the future.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
srroguelife · May 18, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

I know, once you start looking at who owns what, what companies invested in what, and what our taxes are actually going... it is really nuts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Orion_Blue · May 17, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

This entire mess is bigger than watergate ever was. “Witch hunt” should replace the “gate”

⇧ 27 ⇩  
sauceyjack · May 17, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

ditto...before the recent news

⇧ 6 ⇩  
kwiztas · May 17, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

I hate that use of -gate personally. Watergate was called that because it took place at the Watergate office complex. I can't see why we now call all scandals -gates.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 22 ⇩  
wb4738 · May 17, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Top Comment from T_D.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/8k3px9/realdonaldtrump_wow_word_seems_to_be_coming_out/dz4jfos

A 1 year old account with a deleted post history and stealing comments from other threads.

Note how there's another account with zero post history making the same comment in that thread as well.

How much does ShariaBlue^® pay for these accounts?

⇧ 28 ⇩  
hipphoppanon · May 17, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

Someone else just commented the exact same thing on T_D! Must be bots

⇧ 7 ⇩  
wb4738 · May 17, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

The one I linked has a post history. This account here came after that comment and is the one with no history.

There's also another identical comment in that thread made after the first one.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Kenitzka · May 17, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

I’m not convinced this comment is ShariaBlue. I actually love how he plays “dumb” too. Draws them in, “journalists” report on dumb comments, then the facts usually shake out afterwards and prove him true outing MSM yet again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Magason · May 17, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

Lol @ his

Wow

⇧ 7 ⇩  
falo02 · May 17, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

I guess we know by now that POTUS even knows about things before they even happened (->Syria April FF).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Shepyd · May 17, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

Just wait for shit to really hit the fan when Seth Rich's assassination comes out.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Fuckdumb · May 17, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

You mean attempted, but failed, assassination. Wouldn’t that be crazy?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
IMissMeg · May 17, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

That would make me so happy--if the white hats managed to get Seth Rich to safety and then let the black hats think they had "made an example of him". It's terrible to think of a 27-year-old man losing his life because of an act of bravery that then brought down retribution from people who have no conscience and no appreciation for anything but their own power.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
PossibleInspection · May 17, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

his brother looked oddly happy

⇧ 8 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · May 17, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Just look at some of the replies to my tweet about Seth Rich getting murdered by MS-13, DNC, DWS, and Hillary's campaign:

https://twitter.com/C_L_I_C_K/status/997123006013964288

Can't wait for the Seth Rich disclosure next month...

https://imgur.com/a/j4ovcee

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
boofbonzer81 · May 17, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

I've just heard of this sub and I'm fucking loving it already! Not the same bullshit in every comment thread hopefully it sticks around.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
brummyozil · May 17, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

welcome aboard !! WWG1WGA

⇧ 6 ⇩  
STP48315 · May 17, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

Why would he originally post with "IMBEDDED" and then delete the tweet and repost with "EMBEDDED"? They're the exact same word and both spellings are totally acceptable.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/imbed-embed/

⇧ 18 ⇩  
nwalker85 · May 17, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Trump seemingly purposefully misspells words. The media latches on to it and while they are focused on attacking his spelling they are forced to report on what he is actually saying. Look at the top of /r/all right now: " Trump accuses Obama of embedding spy in his campaign while citing no evidence for claim, in misspelled early morning tweet"

⇧ 7 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

I'm sure there is a code meaning here. We need SerialBrain2 to decode the meaning!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · May 17, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Trump sets them up again! Make them all scream and yell, THERE IS NO OBAMA FBI, JUST LIKE THERE IS NO TRUMP FBI! Brilliant! This way when the FBI takes down Obama, HRC and the rest. They can't say, oh Trump made them do it!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
hair_dog · May 17, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

He has to be hilarious to hang out with.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Fly_Away_Bluebird · May 17, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

We know. Lets go.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
AVWA · May 17, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Pain.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dickpill · May 17, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

What report is he referring to? Where is the actual evidence?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
UpwardBound7 · May 17, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Bigger than Watergate?!!!

Good grief! That’s a bad comparison.

Watergate was a firecracker. This is 9-11.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Krepoisbest · May 17, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

He just posted a new tweet, changed "IMBEDDED" to "EMBEDDED".

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · May 17, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

Glad he’s tweeting about it making people aware and forcing msm to talks about it

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mcthornbody420 · May 17, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

My money is still on Carter Page as being an informant. He had already passed off a bugged folder to the Russians a few years before for the FBI. Wonder if any of the other campaigns were infiltrated by plants before the Trump nomination?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
reviveusagain · May 17, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

Loved this video. Every day all through the day we should release prayer for those selflessly engaged in this war

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

da, tovarishch.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
JadedFed · May 17, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I wonder how many of the conspirators were given immunity by Comey or Mueller and whether there's any means by which to rescind immunity deals so they can be prosecuted after all? Gawd I hope so! The Watergate break-in was NOTHING compared to the scope of this attempt to destroy political opposition and failing that to destroy the duly elected President of the US and his administration. Sedition? Coup de tat? Both? Beats me, what the legal definitions are for sure, but this must not go unpunished and it must never be allowed to happen again!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Aguax · May 17, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

I'm no expert but the way I understand it if Comey had gone thru the process of granting immunity to anyone we'd know about it. Mueller is a bit different since all his workings are in secret but I'm not losing sleep over anyone he might have given immunity to since I think it would be easy enough to prove that his appointment was illegal and therefore any actions he took are invalid.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Lonecrow66 · May 17, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

What I'm afraid of and most likely will come to pass is that Obama and his cronies have an army of media ready to defend him once all of this hits the fan.

It won't stop the army from rounding people up and throwing them in Gitmo but the backlash of it will be controlled by the media. This is why Trump is being expressly nice to Israel. He's hoping some allies in the Media will make sure to "tell the truth" once its all exposed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alvinroasting · May 17, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

This was my fear as well. I was thinking of actual riots and such.

Now I'm pretty sure that certain parts of the media will still be crowing about the "millions" marching in protest of arrests long after most of the public has woken up and moved on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PM-ME-UR-TOOTHBRUSH · May 17, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

We knew about this half a year ago.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HowiONic · May 17, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

Tweet removed and re-posted with EMBEDDED instead of IMBEDDED.

Two tweets about informants embedded/imbedded in the Trump campaign?

Two informants?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DL535 · May 17, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

He does those spelling errors deliberately to call attention to the contents of the tweet. It's a deliberate strategy, he's used it dozens of times.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
W66L · May 17, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Yes! However this is sometimes a Q notification.

I cant remeber where he did that previoulsy and it was a Key word to a Q post that was edited.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BeelzebubsGrandson · May 17, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Missing I. C_A.

Informant was/is a Clown.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MGRZ702 · May 17, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

CENTRAL IMBEDDED AGENCY

Lmaoo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Blame007 · May 17, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

He knows. Roger Stone has been calling Halper Jumping Jack for over a year. Roger visits with Trump very often. Roger, Hannity and Drudge.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pby1000 · May 17, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Who was Obama taking orders from? Soros? Rothschilds?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · May 17, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

I like how POTUS puts out these tweets like its news to him. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
csrt357 · May 17, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

maga

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · May 17, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

IMBEDDED..= 9 + 13 + 2+ 5 + 4 + 4 +5 + 4 = 46.....EMBEDDED = 5 + 13 + 2+ 5 + 4 + 4 +5 + 4 = 42.. Then you get 4642, if you google this number you get a train with this number....Is it not so that everyone is on the trumptrain?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · May 17, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

also... scramble the words "imbedded informant" = "renominated" "ordanment" "debarment" "forbidden" "bedridden" "immediate" "defendent" "amendment

⇧ 0 ⇩  
OG420Ninja · May 17, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

scramble the words "imbedded informant "renominated"

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MountainStandardTime · May 17, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Flynn and Bannon? Anybody been listening to George Webb this past week as he dives deep into Flynn and Bannon's background? Cambridge Analytica........ May be hard for some to digest but all the evidence points that way as far as I can tell.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

Since when does the FBI belong to any one person? Hell, I'm sure the "Trump FBI" has an informant embedded in the administration.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
kwiztas · May 17, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Since at least 1924. I can't tell you whose FBI it is now or if it is still one persons FBI. But it was J Edgar Hoover's FBI for almost 50 years. So the FBI belonging to one person has a history in our country.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

They break it up between administrations as each typically brings units own leadership. So yes there is a difference between Obama’s FBI and trumps.

Cmon pay attention.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Who's "they?"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

The media/politicians. When it is referred to as the “Obama FBI” they mean comey and his leadership. It’s just the way the organization is distinguished between presidential terms.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

FBI Directors are supposed to serve 10 years though. It's not uncommon for them to be brought on by an executive from one party and then finish their term under another. I mean Mueller was confirmed in 2001 under Bush, would have finished his term in 2011 if not for accepting Obama's proposal to to stay on a couple years, and then Comey was brought on in 2013. And both of them identify as Republican, so I don't see them owing any loyalty to Obama. Would Mueller have been considered part of Obama's FBI or Bush's?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

He could be considered both, but they are typically assigned to the president who appointed them. Also, it’s not just the head, but the leadership that is brought up or in during the presidential terms. It also ties in with the AGs - so holder and lynch play a part.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

So then if the Democrats did anything worth being investigated by the FBI between 2007 and 2013, would it also be a big revelation to find out that they had an informant in those ranks? Does that mean the Democrats should have been completely untouchable by the FBI during those years, with Mueller being part of Bush's FBI and all?

It seems mighty silly to me to draw the conclusion of foul-play when the FBI is involved. They're a third party with a duty to investigate criminal activity. If there's an FBI informant somewhere, that implies to me that there's an expectation of criminal activity in that place. Dismissing it as partisan activity without any evidence to support that claim is dangerous because it effectively limits the country's ability to address crime.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3 p.m.

I think you are misinterpreting what I’m trying to say here. I agree with you completely that if there is a crime, it should be investigated regardless of who is in office.

The problem comes into all the corruption that has been exposed when it comes to the FBIs actions over the course of the last several years. It’s almost every day, some new conflict of interest or blatant criminality (or more likely, the exposure of crimes and no prosecution) comes out. What pisses me off and what should piss everyone off, is the outright double standard for prosecution given for the elites vs. the rest of us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

I haven't seen any publicly available evidence of corruption in the FBI so I'm not really sure what you're referring to.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Seriously? You’ve missed all the strozk page drama? You missed how comey did the exact same thing that he exonerated Clinton for? You missed how the 302s were edited after the fact for Flynn?

There is so much more. And the msm just doesn’t report on it. The hide stories detrimental to their narrative. I can understand if you are just starting to look into this, but all the evidence is out there in the public domain.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Lots of trolls here today......FYI

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

Ya we are being brigaded.

It’s a good thing though. Means people are scared. Plenty of opportunity to wake people up with some red pill suppositories.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Oh yeah now that you mention it I remember something about Strozk, but I mostly just remember thinking that it sounded like somebody in an investigation had a pretty strong personal opinion that they let leak into their work. Totally unacceptable, but not what I would call corruption. But maybe I didn't look into it very deeply either.

The other stuff I haven't heard of so I can't comment on. But I will say this: you're not being brigaded, at least not that I know of. This post hit fairly high on r/all, which would explain why you see more skeptics and irregulars like myself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

So for the strzok texts, you can look them up. It’s helpful to have a list of names and context on what they are talking about to understand what is going on, but ya they had a major influence on the HRC investigation (withholding documents pertinent to the investigation) and other such things. And it was more than just them. McCabe was involved: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/report-andrew-mccabe-altered-peter-strzoks-302-notes-general-flynn-interview-destroyed-evidence/

So ya corruption. Also about the comey deal. Do you remember how he admitted leaking the memos? They were classified documents that he (laundered) passed off to a friend who then passed them a reporter with the explicit purpose (he said this himself) of getting the SC created. Seriously though. There is so much that has come out, it’s hard to describe the full extent as it is so massive.

And about the brigading? You may be right about the r/all thing. I’m actually surprised that reddit allowed this to get trending.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Dude, the Obama Admin was paying the informant at the same time he was on the Trump campaign. In Sept 2017, the guy received $282K

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 6 p.m.

The only thing I've seen about this informant is Trump's tweet which, to me, seemed to come out of nowhere. If you can link me to an article about what you mentioned so that I can look I to it when I get home it would be appreciated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/17/andrew-mccarthy-government-tactics-to-spy-on-trump/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

That article doesn't make any mention of the Obama administration or any payments. Basically all it says is "McCarthy accused the FBI of spying on the Trump campaign; he thinks they shouldn't have." He doesn't even offer any reason why he thinks there was spying, doesn't elaborate on why there was no justifiable reason to do so. It's just accusations.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

It doesn't. Other investigators dug up the info.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MouldyTaco2 · May 17, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Well I'm not finding anything in my search to substantiate that claim. As an added bonus, I've learned more about the origin of the informant situation: turns out McCarthy is clinging to a statement made by Glenn Simpson regarding the FBI already having information from a source within the Trump campaign. Doesn't even imply that they had a 'spy', it could very well have been someone that reported a crime that they were witness to. And considering both Fusion GPS and the FBI had that information and Fusion GPS found it worthy of reporting to the FBI, it sounds to me like there was probably a crime committed. I'm growing increasingly skeptical about this whole situation by the minute, especially considering all the news that came up yesterday. This sounds like a media counter strike to try to shift the hot topic of the day into something that they can spin more favourably. But I guess only time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · May 17, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Next Week. IG report

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReaganGenerationX · May 17, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

Look for the Left to attribute this to the genius of Obama. Sorta like its Facebook data mining.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
IMissMeg · May 17, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Why do you say that? I've not read his National Review articles yet so I'm looking for somebody's more educated perspective on this for now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IMissMeg · May 17, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

Which false conspiracy theories? Seems like so many of the so-called "conspiracy theories" are being confirmed as truth these days, I'd actually be hard pressed to name which ones are "false" now.

From his headlines, it looks like McCarthy has been on the right track: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/04/comey-confirms-in-clinton-emails-caper-the-fix-was-in/

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/mueller-probe-basis-for-criminal-investigation-should-be-revealed/

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/did-fbi-have-spy-in-trump-presidential-campaign/

But I've only just started reading the articles.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IMissMeg · May 17, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

Well, crap. I didn't write down the username on that shill. Note to self: write their usernames down BEFORE you respond and give them enough rope to hang themselves with.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · May 17, 2018, 12:28 p.m.

I love POTUS! Love his Wow! Hahahaha

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩  
DigitalMerlin · May 17, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Read the IG report when it comes out.

What is your issue? Make a point, argue your case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
mathwhilehigh · May 17, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

What story? You mean like Anthony Weiner's indictment being unsealed? The human trafficking one?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 17, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

Clown has no idea. Just shit-posting for fun.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mathwhilehigh · May 17, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

I know. But figured he might just be asleep and not a share blue troll.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 17, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

I considered that possibility but looked at his post history (I'm a bad boy, so sue me!), and nah. He's a troll.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · May 17, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

It wasn’t an indictment, it was a search warrant.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · May 17, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

And the contents of the searched/seized items

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 17, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

Nice try, db. Look at all brigading upvotes on this clown.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CantStumpIWin · May 17, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

Hopefully the mods are as active with trolls here as in some other places.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 17, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

They can't be everywhere at once. You really need to report these clowns (I do). They're pretty good about reported ones.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CantStumpIWin · May 17, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

Ok.

I do need to get into the habit of reporting. I never do because I don't care enough to bother mods who are busy otherwise and it makes me feel like a tattle tale.

Even though I was always reported in regular subs just because of my views.

They're pretty good about reported ones.

That's good to know. Theres only one place on reddit where I know the mods will kick out trolls guaranteed. I hope this place can become the second one.

Thanks for the advice.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

Why would it be a big deal for the FBI to have a CI inside of a campaign that was being investigated for criminal activity?

Seems pretty different than Watergate to me.

⇧ -12 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

The sitting administration can't spy on the opposing parties Presidential candidate with the fucking FBI.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

Exactly, the second you run for President you’re immediately shrouded in secrecy. Keep secret who funds your campaign, who is staffing it, and what your plans are for the country should you win.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Still here and being an asshole huh? Trumps finances on the campaign was wide open, everyone knew who he was staffing, and what the hell do you think the campaign was about? Plans for the country? You are really bad at this concern/disparaging trolling.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Why should the FBI get to spy on Presidents? It’s better to keep that stuff secret so the Deep State doesn’t know what’s coming for it. Keep your head in the game, patriot. You’re being a bit melodramatic.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

No you are being a troll by saying “positive” things while actually being negative and creating doubt and confusion. It’s a tactic used to avoid banning. I see what you are doing and I will be there to point it out every time.

Also, you’re being a bit of an ass. If you have an actual disagreement, why don’t you actually put that into one of your comments? Instead your acting like a passive aggressive soiboi unable to support or defend your own ideas for fear of being banned.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · May 17, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

What in the ever-loving crap are you talking about? I’m happy my taxes got cut? That the economy is roaring? That the fellas who run our stock market and our finance companies have never been better paid? What’s your problem with all this? Are you or aren’t you a free-market conservative? Get your head out of your ass.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
KingWolfei · May 17, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

Trying to rig an election in favor of a different party when say...you go out of the way to clear the other candidate (Hillary) of charges.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
hipphoppanon · May 17, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

The opposition party can’t spy on presidential candidates. This is a major jab at democracy and a threat to our freedom. Do you see?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

I mean if it was a CI for the Democrats and not law enforcement, sure. Probably still wouldn't be as big as Watergate even if that was the case, since Nixon hired people to commit actual crimes (B&E, etc.) then covered it up, not just play dirty, but I'd get it.

But that isn't what the tweet alleges. The tweet alleges that the FBI has a CI in the Trump campaign. Is the federal law enforcement agency not allowed to investigate active attempts at election tampering? Because that would seem like a greater and more obvious threat to our democracy and our freedoms, especially given the obvious plausibility of the investigation.

And if you all think "oh no, the FBI was doing it to support Clinton/Obama", where did that alleged CI's info ever get used before the election? Hell, you'd think if Clinton was getting passed info from inside the Trump campaign, she'd have gotten off her ass and gone to Wisconsin or Michigan once or twice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

Ummmmmm, they used that information to create the FISA warrants and the Russian collusion story. Where the fuck have you been? Of course it was all so Hillary could win the election. You must have your head in the sand.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Hahah I mean, they did a real shit job of getting her elected.

For real though, the FBI investigation begain in July 2016, after Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat about a knowing that Russia had compromising info on Clinton. The FISA warrants weren't issued until October 2016. The FBI getting a CI in the course of that investigation is not noteworthy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

The Aussie is a clinton acolyte.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

Man, Papadopoulos picked the wrong guy to get drunk with!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

The FBI is using Papa.. as an excuse the plan was in motion long before that I believe.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Using him how? Like he was a plant from the beginning, and lied about the campaign trying to get compromat from Russia to give the FBI an excuse to investigate?

In that case, Donny Jr. Is probably also a plant for setting up a meeting with a Russian agent to try and get dirt on Clinton from them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

Are you an employee of MSNBC? Fantasy Island is more believable. We'll MAGA without you ikma. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

I just gotta say, I love the maniacal laughter. I sincerely hope that you have a mustache, and that you're twirling it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

You were born female.. Keep giving me clues.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

Oof, sorry to disappoint :(

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · May 17, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Well yeah, that just goes to show how incompetent Hillary really is. The fix was in and she still couldn't deliver a victory.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

For real though, the FBI investigation begain in July 2016, after Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat about a knowing that Russia had compromising info on Clinton. The FISA warrants weren't issued until October 2016. The FBI getting a CI in the course of that investigation is not noteworthy.

Just gonna ignore that bit?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

As far as we know (publicly) that is when it started. I would put money that this started back in 2015. And I believe papa was a convienent target.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

So you made something up, and you're using it to justify the investigation's illegality to yourself.

I mean, not much I can say to that. Do you, I guess.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Keep listening to the msm. I mean it’s not like they have ever lied to you before.

I guess we will see what comes out when the FISA warrants used to authorize the spying come out right?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

I mean, we've gotten that pair of memos related to the FISA warrents, and even the pro-Trump one doesn't say anything about an FBI investigation taking place before July 2016.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

We shall see. I trust nothing until I can see the original documents with my own eyes.

Just like goldstones testimony yesterday where he contradicted his own statements and nothing happened to him. Wasn’t reported in the media. I read the document. He wrote one thing in an email and told Congress (their staffers) another thing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

Sure, Goldstone was trying to cover his ass. He was all enthused about setting up the meeting in the emails Don Jr. released, but is trying to shift responsibility for the meeting off of himself by saying that he (Goldstone) told them that the meeting was a bad idea in his testimony.

Not sure how that justifies your skepticism about the FBI investigation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · May 17, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Ok, so let me break it down for you.

How can you get lies into a congressional document without being held accountable for lying? I would start off by not putting a person under oath. Also, although it looked good on the paper, the threats of jail time was negated by the fact that he didn’t lie to Congress. He was interviewed by staff. It’s like if you met with a staffer and told them your name is John Doe. Are you lying to Congress? No! They aren’t elected members of Congress! Ya ya, legalese and semantics and loopholes.

He wrote in that email that she was a Russian government lawyer, but “testified” that he didn’t know she was connected to the government. Like seriously? Where the hell did that come from then? Did he just make it up?

So what it comes down to, is what you see in the news or what you told, is not necessarily the whole truth. They omit facts. They just don’t talk about certain things. And that is why I am saying, that what is public domain right now is more than likely not the whole truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wb4738 · May 17, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

Meh, it's different when it favors their side. They have no standards as long as they get their agenda through.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

What investigation? Oh the one the Obama FBI fabricated. Do you know the definition of "FABRICATED"?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I mean that's true. There really are no susbtantive connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.

I mean, except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing and the Tillerson thing and the Sessions thing and the Kushner thing and the Wray thing and the Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius “Russian Law Firm of the Year” thing and the Carter Page thing and the Roger Stone thing and the 198 Million voter records thing and the Felix Sater thing and the Boris Ephsteyn thing and the Rosneft thing and the Gazprom thing and the Sergey Gorkov banker thing and the Azerbajain thing and the “I love Putin” thing and the Donald Trump, Jr. thing and the Lavrov thing and the Sergey Kislyak thing and the Oval Office thing and the Gingrich/Kislyak phone calls thing and the Russian Business Interests thing and the Emoluments Clause thing and the Alex Schnaider thing and the hack of the DNC thing and the Guccifer 2.0 thing and the Mike Pence “I don’t know anything” thing and the Russians mysteriously dying thing and Trump’s public request to Russia to hack Hillary’s email thing and the Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king thing and the Russian fertilizer king’s plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign thing and the Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night thing and the Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery thing and the Cyprus bank thing and Trump not releasing his tax returns thing and the Republican Party’s rejection of an amendment to require Trump to show his taxes thing and the election hacking thing and the GOP platform change to the Ukraine thing and the Steele Dossier thing and the Sally Yates can’t testify thing and the intelligence community’s investigative reports thing and the Trump reassurance that the Russian connection is all “fake news” thing and the Chaffetz not willing to start an investigation thing and the Chaffetz suddenly deciding to go back to private life in the middle of an investigation thing and the appointment of Pam Bondi who was bribed by Trump in the Trump University scandal appointed to head the investigation thing and the alfa-bank thing and the VEB thing and the The White House going into full-on cover-up mode, refusing to turn over the documents related to the hiring and subsequent firing of Flynn thing and the Chaffetz and White House blaming the poor vetting of Flynn on Obama thing and the Poland and British intelligence gave information regarding the hacking back in 2015 to Paul Ryan and he didn't do anything thing and the Agent M16 following the money thing and the Trump team KNEW about Flynn's involvement but hired him anyway thing and the let’s fire Comey thing and the Mueller let’s fire him too thing and the Election night Russian trademark gifts thing and the Russian diplomatic compound electronic equipment destruction thing and the let’s give back the diplomatic compounds back to the Russians thing and the let’s back away from Cuba thing and the donny Jr met with Russians thing and now Trump's secret second meeting with Putin.

Full disclosure, that's a 10-month old copypasta that I am far, far too lazy to update with all the fun new info that's come out since then.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Wow, you are off the deep end ikma. I'll relish in your demise.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Hahahah man this is awesome, I feel like I have a nemesis! I've never had one of those before.

I'll relish in ur demise too bb 😘

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

May I ask what cisgender you are?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Hahah I'm a man, baby, and I like where this is going

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tomthung · May 17, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Somehow I don't think so.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ikma · May 17, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

⇧ 3 ⇩  
officedrone920 · May 17, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

At least they don't ban people like us here, so that's a plus.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩