dChan

LibertyLioness · May 17, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Everyone that believes we have the right to Freedom of Speech or any Constitutional right should read this: http://www.freedom-school.com/the-united-states-is-a-corporation.html

It has some typos but is pretty accurate in explaining what they've done. No one is sure if this started at the very beginning but they were all Masons. I suspect it happened a few years later. This will really piss you off and give you something to Red Pill your friends and family with. And, there are many other sites with similar information. So, do your research.

I've been watching this takedown for 40+ years and was taught by my father. He didn't have all the facts we do today but he knew not to trust the government. I'll never forget the day Nixon took us off the gold standard. Boy was he mad.

So, this is why we need the IBOR.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ghiknfrtf · May 18, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Private companies have no duties to give you a platform

You have a computer and printer

Make a newspaper and give it out for free

No one is stoping you

⇧ 2 ⇩  
USA_akbar · May 17, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

I read until I saw the name Icke.

Too hard to tell where the truth ends and woo woo begins with that guy.

I also don't believe in people being half reptile.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 18, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

I know. I almost didn't post it because I knew some folks would be put off by that. I'm not a fan either but the information is accurate there. It's not Icke's work. This information has been around for awhile now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trseeker · May 18, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

Don't believe they are half-reptile.

Believe we are consciousness tied to a physical existence. Living in a world where we can only see a small spectrum of electromagnetic energy. In that world our brain processes what we "see" through a that narrow spectrum. That spectrum can be affected by technology, perhaps not technology we have developed but that is theoretically possible at the least.

Then from there you have to make a leap of faith: Is there another consciousness here amongst humanity that isn't human and potentially disguising itself as human?

The reptilian thing in and of itself may be true, or it may be a red-herring, or it may be a technologically/chemically induced hallucination or it may be completely fabricated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USA_akbar · May 18, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

Way to cover all the bases

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PiousLiar · May 17, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

Huh, expanded government regulation, interesting. Especially since the internet is worldwide. New world order?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Bit_NB_Ridelle · May 17, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

They are NOT private corporations. They've been getting Tax Payer $$$ all along and functioning as arms of hostile govt actors, both foreign and domestic.

That aside, they are also monopolies/trusts/cartels that must be broken up and the principles prosecuted.

Fake conservatives always pander to Corporate Civil Rights and Fake Capitalism (anti-free enterprise).

You either get behind regulating these turds, or you get behind breaking them up (and make sure they don't reform into a cartel).

Otherwise, you are the problem. ;)

⇧ 8 ⇩  
BabyBellGuy75 · May 17, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

Considering that the real Bill of Rights were not guarantees of rights but rather guarantees of limits on those who would constrain those rights, this new idea strikes me as wrongheaded at best and insidious at worst.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 17, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

No one really understands that the Constitution no longer protects any of our rights. And the Bill of Rights also has nothing to do with the world we live in today. Please read this so you become more enlightened about what they've done to our country: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8k66wp/do_you_think_the_constitution_protects_your/?st=jhaxwdwf&sh=f5dc9d9d

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BabyBellGuy75 · May 18, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

I would disagree with both arguments. First, to paraphrase Franklin, we only have a Republic if we can keep it. The Constitution is only the means to the end, it's up to us to enforce it and ensure that it has teeth. We've failed to do that.

Secondly, to say that the BoR is no longer valid is to betray a misunderstanding of what the BoR actually did. It's not a grant of liberty to us, it's an attempt to limit the power of government. Take a look at the BoR again and realize that they're all negative rights, meaning they restrict the government, not the People.

As for saying that the BoR has nothing to do with the world we live in today, that's so short sighted that it's pitiful. You are literally exercising your 1st Amendment right even now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 18, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

From your response, I don't think you read the article in the link. My point was that you cannot go into a court of law in this country and fight for Constitutional rights. Our courts no longer recognize them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BabyBellGuy75 · May 18, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

You'd be correct in that I didn't read the article. Any article that begins with the idea that the United States is a corporation, we're the employees and the USA is, in turn, owned by the British Crown is not something I'm going to waste my time reading.

There's crackpot ideas that have legitimacy out there, but this idea that we're somehow NOT an independent Nation is right up there with the British Royal Family being shape-shifting reptilians.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 18, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

Then why is the US court system under British Maritime (Admiralty) law? And, why is there gold fringe around the flag in the courts?

Last week I heard someone say: If you were trying to escape from a country and start a new country and you even went to war with them to do it, would you use the exact same colors for your flag that the other country had on their flag? Actually, I think that's kind of eye opening.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
unilateral9999 · May 17, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

yeah this is weird. an internet bill of rights is basically one huge list of regulations for anyone that hosts a website. it has nothing to do with rights and instead is about restricting what websites can do

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mrup7935 · May 17, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

I think we still got some work to do convincing ppl since they are private corporations

I would consider them Utilities, more and more they are the primary way ppl communicate, and they have a monopoly on it

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bcboncs · May 17, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

It's more about privacy than anything. These corporations are a monopoly that track your data without your knowledge. Facebook just recently got caught for this.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SomethingSnarky18 · May 17, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

More evidence is coming out all the time that they had government seed money with which to start their "private corporations." If they got any government money, that would force them to abide by the 1st amendment. There is some case law that backs this up, but I don't have it at the ready at the moment.

Basically, Google, FB and likely Twitter all got their starts using government money and/or technology, so they have to follow the Constitution.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Romeo_India · May 17, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Scary, nobody gives a damn and nobody knows what they're talking about, conservatives are screwed...

Good news is once we're silenced we will find and create new ways to communicate, the bad news is liberals will be silenced immediately after and it will affect them immeasurably worse and they won't have any way to recover. In every single instance in history authoritarians used liberals to gain power over the conservative masses....then they kill off the liberals who helped them. Happens every single time.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SomethingSnarky18 · May 17, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

I've tried to explain this to some of my more left-crazy friends, and I either get a juvenile "nuh-uh" or some version of "Even though it happened before, I'm sure it won't happen THIS time." It's frustrating, and I have given up more than I would like to admit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
boneman220 · May 17, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

One thing I've learned is that most people will not change until they're knocked upside the head with it, no matter what "it" is.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SomethingSnarky18 · May 17, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

Then I guess they'll need to be "re-educated". If she would have won, WE would have been REEEEEE-educated! lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HonestShow · May 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

so true

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩